Termination Proof using AProVE

Term Rewriting System R:
[X, Z, N, Y, X1, X2]
from(X) -> cons(X, n_{_from}(n_{_s}(X)))
from(X) -> n_{_from}(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
s(X) -> n_{_s}(X)
cons(X1, X2) -> n_{_cons}(X1, X2)
activate(n_{_from}(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(n_{_s}(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(n_{_cons}(X1, X2)) -> cons(activate(X1), X2)
activate(X) -> X

Termination of R to be shown.

     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

FROM(X) -> CONS(X, n_{_from}(n_{_s}(X)))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> ACTIVATE(Y)
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSNEG(N, activate(Z))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> ACTIVATE(Z)
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> ACTIVATE(Y)
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSPOS(N, activate(Z))
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> ACTIVATE(Z)
PI(X) -> 2NDSPOS(X, from(0))
PI(X) -> FROM(0)
PLUS(s(X), Y) -> S(plus(X, Y))
PLUS(s(X), Y) -> PLUS(X, Y)
TIMES(s(X), Y) -> PLUS(Y, times(X, Y))
TIMES(s(X), Y) -> TIMES(X, Y)
SQUARE(X) -> TIMES(X, X)
ACTIVATE(n_{_from}(X)) -> FROM(activate(X))
ACTIVATE(n_{_from}(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n_{_s}(X)) -> S(activate(X))
ACTIVATE(n_{_s}(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n_{_cons}(X1, X2)) -> CONS(activate(X1), X2)
ACTIVATE(n_{_cons}(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X1)

Furthermore, R contains four SCCs.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Remaining

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVATE(n_{_cons}(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X1)
ACTIVATE(n_{_s}(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n_{_from}(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, n_{_from}(n_{_s}(X)))
from(X) -> n_{_from}(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
s(X) -> n_{_s}(X)
cons(X1, X2) -> n_{_cons}(X1, X2)
activate(n_{_from}(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(n_{_s}(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(n_{_cons}(X1, X2)) -> cons(activate(X1), X2)
activate(X) -> X

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

ACTIVATE(n_{_cons}(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X1)
ACTIVATE(n_{_s}(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n_{_from}(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)

There are no usable rules using the Ce-refinement that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

ACTIVATE(x₁) -> ACTIVATE(x₁)
n_{_cons}(x₁, x₂) -> n_{_cons}(x₁, x₂)
n_{_s}(x₁) -> n_{_s}(x₁)
n_{_from}(x₁) -> n_{_from}(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 5

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Remaining

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, n_{_from}(n_{_s}(X)))
from(X) -> n_{_from}(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
s(X) -> n_{_s}(X)
cons(X1, X2) -> n_{_cons}(X1, X2)
activate(n_{_from}(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(n_{_s}(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(n_{_cons}(X1, X2)) -> cons(activate(X1), X2)
activate(X) -> X

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Remaining

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

PLUS(s(X), Y) -> PLUS(X, Y)

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, n_{_from}(n_{_s}(X)))
from(X) -> n_{_from}(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
s(X) -> n_{_s}(X)
cons(X1, X2) -> n_{_cons}(X1, X2)
activate(n_{_from}(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(n_{_s}(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(n_{_cons}(X1, X2)) -> cons(activate(X1), X2)
activate(X) -> X

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

PLUS(s(X), Y) -> PLUS(X, Y)

There are no usable rules using the Ce-refinement that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

PLUS(x₁, x₂) -> PLUS(x₁, x₂)
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 6

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Remaining

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, n_{_from}(n_{_s}(X)))
from(X) -> n_{_from}(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
s(X) -> n_{_s}(X)
cons(X1, X2) -> n_{_cons}(X1, X2)
activate(n_{_from}(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(n_{_s}(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(n_{_cons}(X1, X2)) -> cons(activate(X1), X2)
activate(X) -> X

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)

The following remains to be proven:

Dependency Pairs:
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSPOS(N, activate(Z))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSNEG(N, activate(Z))

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, n_{_from}(n_{_s}(X)))
from(X) -> n_{_from}(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
s(X) -> n_{_s}(X)
cons(X1, X2) -> n_{_cons}(X1, X2)
activate(n_{_from}(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(n_{_s}(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(n_{_cons}(X1, X2)) -> cons(activate(X1), X2)
activate(X) -> X
Dependency Pair:
TIMES(s(X), Y) -> TIMES(X, Y)

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, n_{_from}(n_{_s}(X)))
from(X) -> n_{_from}(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
s(X) -> n_{_s}(X)
cons(X1, X2) -> n_{_cons}(X1, X2)
activate(n_{_from}(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(n_{_s}(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(n_{_cons}(X1, X2)) -> cons(activate(X1), X2)
activate(X) -> X

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)

The following remains to be proven:

Dependency Pairs:
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSPOS(N, activate(Z))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSNEG(N, activate(Z))

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, n_{_from}(n_{_s}(X)))
from(X) -> n_{_from}(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
s(X) -> n_{_s}(X)
cons(X1, X2) -> n_{_cons}(X1, X2)
activate(n_{_from}(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(n_{_s}(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(n_{_cons}(X1, X2)) -> cons(activate(X1), X2)
activate(X) -> X
Dependency Pair:
TIMES(s(X), Y) -> TIMES(X, Y)

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, n_{_from}(n_{_s}(X)))
from(X) -> n_{_from}(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, n_{_cons}(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(activate(Y)), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
s(X) -> n_{_s}(X)
cons(X1, X2) -> n_{_cons}(X1, X2)
activate(n_{_from}(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(n_{_s}(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(n_{_cons}(X1, X2)) -> cons(activate(X1), X2)
activate(X) -> X

Termination of R could not be shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes