Term Rewriting System R:
[y, x, u, v, z]
merge(nil, y) -> y
merge(x, nil) -> x
merge(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> if(< (x, u), .(x, merge(y, .(u, v))), .(u, merge(.(x, y), v)))
++(nil, y) -> y
++(.(x, y), z) -> .(x, ++(y, z))
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> x

Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Overlay and local confluence Check



The TRS is overlay and locally confluent (all critical pairs are trivially joinable).Hence, we can switch to innermost. 


   R
     ↳OC
       →TRS2
         ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

MERGE(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> IF(< (x, u), .(x, merge(y, .(u, v))), .(u, merge(.(x, y), v)))
MERGE(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> MERGE(y, .(u, v))
MERGE(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> MERGE(.(x, y), v)
++'(.(x, y), z) -> ++'(y, z)

Furthermore, R contains two SCCs. 


   R
     ↳OC
       →TRS2
         ↳DPs
           →DP Problem 1
             ↳Usable Rules (Innermost)
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pairs:

MERGE(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> MERGE(.(x, y), v)
MERGE(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> MERGE(y, .(u, v))


Rules:


merge(nil, y) -> y
merge(x, nil) -> x
merge(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> if(< (x, u), .(x, merge(y, .(u, v))), .(u, merge(.(x, y), v)))
++(nil, y) -> y
++(.(x, y), z) -> .(x, ++(y, z))
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> x


Strategy:

innermost




As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 7 non-usable-rules.


   R
     ↳OC
       →TRS2
         ↳DPs
           →DP Problem 1
             ↳UsableRules
             ...
               →DP Problem 3
                 ↳Size-Change Principle
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pairs:

MERGE(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> MERGE(.(x, y), v)
MERGE(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> MERGE(y, .(u, v))


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We number the DPs as follows:
  1. MERGE(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> MERGE(.(x, y), v)
  2. MERGE(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> MERGE(y, .(u, v))
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1, 2} , {1, 2}
1=1
2>2
{1, 2} , {1, 2}
1>1
2=2

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1, 2} , {1, 2}
1>1
2=2
{1, 2} , {1, 2}
1=1
2>2
{1, 2} , {1, 2}
1>1
2>2

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
.(x1, x2) -> .(x1, x2)

We obtain no new DP problems. 


   R
     ↳OC
       →TRS2
         ↳DPs
           →DP Problem 1
             ↳UsableRules
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳Usable Rules (Innermost)


Dependency Pair:

++'(.(x, y), z) -> ++'(y, z)


Rules:


merge(nil, y) -> y
merge(x, nil) -> x
merge(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> if(< (x, u), .(x, merge(y, .(u, v))), .(u, merge(.(x, y), v)))
++(nil, y) -> y
++(.(x, y), z) -> .(x, ++(y, z))
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> x


Strategy:

innermost




As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 7 non-usable-rules.


   R
     ↳OC
       →TRS2
         ↳DPs
           →DP Problem 1
             ↳UsableRules
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳UsableRules
             ...
               →DP Problem 4
                 ↳Size-Change Principle


Dependency Pair:

++'(.(x, y), z) -> ++'(y, z)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We number the DPs as follows:
  1. ++'(.(x, y), z) -> ++'(y, z)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1
2=2

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1
2=2

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
.(x1, x2) -> .(x1, x2)

We obtain no new DP problems.

Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes