Term Rewriting System R:
[y, x, z]
++(nil, y) -> y
++(x, nil) -> x
++(.(x, y), z) -> .(x, ++(y, z))
++(++(x, y), z) -> ++(x, ++(y, z))

Termination of R to be shown.



   R
Removing Redundant Rules



Removing the following rules from R which fullfill a polynomial ordering:

++(nil, y) -> y
++(x, nil) -> x

where the Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(++(x1, x2))=  x1 + x2  
  POL(nil)=  1  
  POL(.(x1, x2))=  x1 + x2  
was used.

Not all Rules of R can be deleted, so we still have to regard a part of R.


   R
RRRPolo
       →TRS2
Removing Redundant Rules



Removing the following rules from R which fullfill a polynomial ordering:

++(.(x, y), z) -> .(x, ++(y, z))

where the Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(++(x1, x2))=  2·x1 + x2  
  POL(.(x1, x2))=  1 + x1 + x2  
was used.

Not all Rules of R can be deleted, so we still have to regard a part of R.


   R
RRRPolo
       →TRS2
RRRPolo
           →TRS3
Removing Redundant Rules



Removing the following rules from R which fullfill a polynomial ordering:

++(++(x, y), z) -> ++(x, ++(y, z))

where the Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(++(x1, x2))=  1 + 2·x1 + x2  
was used.

All Rules of R can be deleted.


   R
RRRPolo
       →TRS2
RRRPolo
           →TRS3
RRRPolo
             ...
               →TRS4
Overlay and local confluence Check



The TRS is overlay and locally confluent (all critical pairs are trivially joinable).Hence, we can switch to innermost.


   R
RRRPolo
       →TRS2
RRRPolo
           →TRS3
RRRPolo
             ...
               →TRS5
Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains no Dependency Pairs and therefore no SCCs.

Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes