Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y]
or(x, x) -> x
and(x, x) -> x
not(not(x)) -> x
not(and(x, y)) -> or(not(x), not(y))
not(or(x, y)) -> and(not(x), not(y))

Termination of R to be shown.



   R
Removing Redundant Rules



Removing the following rules from R which fullfill a polynomial ordering:

or(x, x) -> x
and(x, x) -> x

where the Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(and(x1, x2))=  1 + x1 + x2  
  POL(or(x1, x2))=  1 + x1 + x2  
  POL(not(x1))=  x1  
was used.

Not all Rules of R can be deleted, so we still have to regard a part of R.


   R
RRRPolo
       →TRS2
Removing Redundant Rules



Removing the following rules from R which fullfill a polynomial ordering:

not(and(x, y)) -> or(not(x), not(y))
not(or(x, y)) -> and(not(x), not(y))

where the Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(and(x1, x2))=  1 + x1 + x2  
  POL(or(x1, x2))=  1 + x1 + x2  
  POL(not(x1))=  2·x1  
was used.

Not all Rules of R can be deleted, so we still have to regard a part of R.


   R
RRRPolo
       →TRS2
RRRPolo
           →TRS3
Removing Redundant Rules



Removing the following rules from R which fullfill a polynomial ordering:

not(not(x)) -> x

where the Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(not(x1))=  1 + x1  
was used.

All Rules of R can be deleted.


   R
RRRPolo
       →TRS2
RRRPolo
           →TRS3
RRRPolo
             ...
               →TRS4
Overlay and local confluence Check



The TRS is overlay and locally confluent (all critical pairs are trivially joinable).Hence, we can switch to innermost.


   R
RRRPolo
       →TRS2
RRRPolo
           →TRS3
RRRPolo
             ...
               →TRS5
Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains no Dependency Pairs and therefore no SCCs.

Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes