Term Rewriting System R:
[X, Y]
ackin(s(X), s(Y)) -> u21(ackin(s(X), Y), X)
u21(ackout(X), Y) -> u22(ackin(Y, X))

Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Overlay and local confluence Check



The TRS is overlay and locally confluent (all critical pairs are trivially joinable).Hence, we can switch to innermost. 


   R
     ↳OC
       →TRS2
         ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

ACKIN(s(X), s(Y)) -> U21(ackin(s(X), Y), X)
ACKIN(s(X), s(Y)) -> ACKIN(s(X), Y)
U21(ackout(X), Y) -> ACKIN(Y, X)

Furthermore, R contains one SCC. 


   R
     ↳OC
       →TRS2
         ↳DPs
           →DP Problem 1
             ↳Usable Rules (Innermost)


Dependency Pair:

ACKIN(s(X), s(Y)) -> ACKIN(s(X), Y)


Rules:


ackin(s(X), s(Y)) -> u21(ackin(s(X), Y), X)
u21(ackout(X), Y) -> u22(ackin(Y, X))


Strategy:

innermost




As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 2 non-usable-rules.


   R
     ↳OC
       →TRS2
         ↳DPs
           →DP Problem 1
             ↳UsableRules
             ...
               →DP Problem 2
                 ↳Size-Change Principle


Dependency Pair:

ACKIN(s(X), s(Y)) -> ACKIN(s(X), Y)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We number the DPs as follows:
  1. ACKIN(s(X), s(Y)) -> ACKIN(s(X), Y)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1} , {1}
1=1
2>2

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1} , {1}
1=1
2>2

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
s(x1) -> s(x1)

We obtain no new DP problems.

Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes