Term Rewriting System R:
[X, Y]
ackin(0, X) -> ackout(s(X))
ackin(s(X), 0) -> u11(ackin(X, s(0)))
ackin(s(X), s(Y)) -> u21(ackin(s(X), Y), X)
u11(ackout(X)) -> ackout(X)
u21(ackout(X), Y) -> u22(ackin(Y, X))
u22(ackout(X)) -> ackout(X)
Termination of R to be shown.
R
↳Overlay and local confluence Check
The TRS is overlay and locally confluent (all critical pairs are trivially joinable).Hence, we can switch to innermost.
R
↳OC
→TRS2
↳Dependency Pair Analysis
R contains the following Dependency Pairs:
ACKIN(s(X), 0) -> U11(ackin(X, s(0)))
ACKIN(s(X), 0) -> ACKIN(X, s(0))
ACKIN(s(X), s(Y)) -> U21(ackin(s(X), Y), X)
ACKIN(s(X), s(Y)) -> ACKIN(s(X), Y)
U21(ackout(X), Y) -> U22(ackin(Y, X))
U21(ackout(X), Y) -> ACKIN(Y, X)
Furthermore, R contains one SCC.
R
↳OC
→TRS2
↳DPs
→DP Problem 1
↳Size-Change Principle
Dependency Pairs:
ACKIN(s(X), s(Y)) -> ACKIN(s(X), Y)
U21(ackout(X), Y) -> ACKIN(Y, X)
ACKIN(s(X), s(Y)) -> U21(ackin(s(X), Y), X)
ACKIN(s(X), 0) -> ACKIN(X, s(0))
Rules:
ackin(0, X) -> ackout(s(X))
ackin(s(X), 0) -> u11(ackin(X, s(0)))
ackin(s(X), s(Y)) -> u21(ackin(s(X), Y), X)
u11(ackout(X)) -> ackout(X)
u21(ackout(X), Y) -> u22(ackin(Y, X))
u22(ackout(X)) -> ackout(X)
Strategy:
innermost
We number the DPs as follows:
- ACKIN(s(X), s(Y)) -> ACKIN(s(X), Y)
- U21(ackout(X), Y) -> ACKIN(Y, X)
- ACKIN(s(X), s(Y)) -> U21(ackin(s(X), Y), X)
- ACKIN(s(X), 0) -> ACKIN(X, s(0))
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none
We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial
with Argument Filtering System:
s(x1) -> s(x1)
ackout(x1) -> ackout(x1)
We obtain no new DP problems.
Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes