Term Rewriting System R:
[y, x, z]
minusactive(0, y) -> 0
minusactive(s(x), s(y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
minusactive(x, y) -> minus(x, y)
mark(0) -> 0
mark(s(x)) -> s(mark(x))
mark(minus(x, y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
mark(ge(x, y)) -> geactive(x, y)
mark(div(x, y)) -> divactive(mark(x), y)
mark(if(x, y, z)) -> ifactive(mark(x), y, z)
geactive(x, 0) -> true
geactive(0, s(y)) -> false
geactive(s(x), s(y)) -> geactive(x, y)
geactive(x, y) -> ge(x, y)
divactive(0, s(y)) -> 0
divactive(s(x), s(y)) -> ifactive(geactive(x, y), s(div(minus(x, y), s(y))), 0)
divactive(x, y) -> div(x, y)
ifactive(true, x, y) -> mark(x)
ifactive(false, x, y) -> mark(y)
ifactive(x, y, z) -> if(x, y, z)

Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

MINUSACTIVE(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUSACTIVE(x, y)
MARK(s(x)) -> MARK(x)
MARK(minus(x, y)) -> MINUSACTIVE(x, y)
MARK(ge(x, y)) -> GEACTIVE(x, y)
MARK(div(x, y)) -> DIVACTIVE(mark(x), y)
MARK(div(x, y)) -> MARK(x)
MARK(if(x, y, z)) -> IFACTIVE(mark(x), y, z)
MARK(if(x, y, z)) -> MARK(x)
GEACTIVE(s(x), s(y)) -> GEACTIVE(x, y)
DIVACTIVE(s(x), s(y)) -> IFACTIVE(geactive(x, y), s(div(minus(x, y), s(y))), 0)
DIVACTIVE(s(x), s(y)) -> GEACTIVE(x, y)
IFACTIVE(true, x, y) -> MARK(x)
IFACTIVE(false, x, y) -> MARK(y)

Furthermore, R contains three SCCs. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polynomial Ordering
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polo


Dependency Pair:

MINUSACTIVE(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUSACTIVE(x, y)


Rules:


minusactive(0, y) -> 0
minusactive(s(x), s(y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
minusactive(x, y) -> minus(x, y)
mark(0) -> 0
mark(s(x)) -> s(mark(x))
mark(minus(x, y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
mark(ge(x, y)) -> geactive(x, y)
mark(div(x, y)) -> divactive(mark(x), y)
mark(if(x, y, z)) -> ifactive(mark(x), y, z)
geactive(x, 0) -> true
geactive(0, s(y)) -> false
geactive(s(x), s(y)) -> geactive(x, y)
geactive(x, y) -> ge(x, y)
divactive(0, s(y)) -> 0
divactive(s(x), s(y)) -> ifactive(geactive(x, y), s(div(minus(x, y), s(y))), 0)
divactive(x, y) -> div(x, y)
ifactive(true, x, y) -> mark(x)
ifactive(false, x, y) -> mark(y)
ifactive(x, y, z) -> if(x, y, z)





The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

MINUSACTIVE(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUSACTIVE(x, y)


There are no usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(s(x1))=  1 + x1  
  POL(MINUS_ACTIVE(x1, x2))=  x1  

resulting in one new DP problem. 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
           →DP Problem 4
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polo


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


minusactive(0, y) -> 0
minusactive(s(x), s(y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
minusactive(x, y) -> minus(x, y)
mark(0) -> 0
mark(s(x)) -> s(mark(x))
mark(minus(x, y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
mark(ge(x, y)) -> geactive(x, y)
mark(div(x, y)) -> divactive(mark(x), y)
mark(if(x, y, z)) -> ifactive(mark(x), y, z)
geactive(x, 0) -> true
geactive(0, s(y)) -> false
geactive(s(x), s(y)) -> geactive(x, y)
geactive(x, y) -> ge(x, y)
divactive(0, s(y)) -> 0
divactive(s(x), s(y)) -> ifactive(geactive(x, y), s(div(minus(x, y), s(y))), 0)
divactive(x, y) -> div(x, y)
ifactive(true, x, y) -> mark(x)
ifactive(false, x, y) -> mark(y)
ifactive(x, y, z) -> if(x, y, z)





Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polynomial Ordering
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polo


Dependency Pair:

GEACTIVE(s(x), s(y)) -> GEACTIVE(x, y)


Rules:


minusactive(0, y) -> 0
minusactive(s(x), s(y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
minusactive(x, y) -> minus(x, y)
mark(0) -> 0
mark(s(x)) -> s(mark(x))
mark(minus(x, y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
mark(ge(x, y)) -> geactive(x, y)
mark(div(x, y)) -> divactive(mark(x), y)
mark(if(x, y, z)) -> ifactive(mark(x), y, z)
geactive(x, 0) -> true
geactive(0, s(y)) -> false
geactive(s(x), s(y)) -> geactive(x, y)
geactive(x, y) -> ge(x, y)
divactive(0, s(y)) -> 0
divactive(s(x), s(y)) -> ifactive(geactive(x, y), s(div(minus(x, y), s(y))), 0)
divactive(x, y) -> div(x, y)
ifactive(true, x, y) -> mark(x)
ifactive(false, x, y) -> mark(y)
ifactive(x, y, z) -> if(x, y, z)





The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

GEACTIVE(s(x), s(y)) -> GEACTIVE(x, y)


There are no usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(GE_ACTIVE(x1, x2))=  x1  
  POL(s(x1))=  1 + x1  

resulting in one new DP problem. 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
           →DP Problem 5
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polo


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


minusactive(0, y) -> 0
minusactive(s(x), s(y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
minusactive(x, y) -> minus(x, y)
mark(0) -> 0
mark(s(x)) -> s(mark(x))
mark(minus(x, y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
mark(ge(x, y)) -> geactive(x, y)
mark(div(x, y)) -> divactive(mark(x), y)
mark(if(x, y, z)) -> ifactive(mark(x), y, z)
geactive(x, 0) -> true
geactive(0, s(y)) -> false
geactive(s(x), s(y)) -> geactive(x, y)
geactive(x, y) -> ge(x, y)
divactive(0, s(y)) -> 0
divactive(s(x), s(y)) -> ifactive(geactive(x, y), s(div(minus(x, y), s(y))), 0)
divactive(x, y) -> div(x, y)
ifactive(true, x, y) -> mark(x)
ifactive(false, x, y) -> mark(y)
ifactive(x, y, z) -> if(x, y, z)





Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polynomial Ordering


Dependency Pairs:

MARK(if(x, y, z)) -> MARK(x)
IFACTIVE(false, x, y) -> MARK(y)
MARK(if(x, y, z)) -> IFACTIVE(mark(x), y, z)
MARK(div(x, y)) -> MARK(x)
IFACTIVE(true, x, y) -> MARK(x)
DIVACTIVE(s(x), s(y)) -> IFACTIVE(geactive(x, y), s(div(minus(x, y), s(y))), 0)
MARK(div(x, y)) -> DIVACTIVE(mark(x), y)
MARK(s(x)) -> MARK(x)


Rules:


minusactive(0, y) -> 0
minusactive(s(x), s(y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
minusactive(x, y) -> minus(x, y)
mark(0) -> 0
mark(s(x)) -> s(mark(x))
mark(minus(x, y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
mark(ge(x, y)) -> geactive(x, y)
mark(div(x, y)) -> divactive(mark(x), y)
mark(if(x, y, z)) -> ifactive(mark(x), y, z)
geactive(x, 0) -> true
geactive(0, s(y)) -> false
geactive(s(x), s(y)) -> geactive(x, y)
geactive(x, y) -> ge(x, y)
divactive(0, s(y)) -> 0
divactive(s(x), s(y)) -> ifactive(geactive(x, y), s(div(minus(x, y), s(y))), 0)
divactive(x, y) -> div(x, y)
ifactive(true, x, y) -> mark(x)
ifactive(false, x, y) -> mark(y)
ifactive(x, y, z) -> if(x, y, z)





The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

MARK(if(x, y, z)) -> MARK(x)
MARK(if(x, y, z)) -> IFACTIVE(mark(x), y, z)


There are no usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(ge_active(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(MARK(x1))=  x1  
  POL(div_active(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(false)=  0  
  POL(minus(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(true)=  0  
  POL(mark(x1))=  0  
  POL(minus_active(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(if(x1, x2, x3))=  1 + x1 + x2 + x3  
  POL(0)=  0  
  POL(s(x1))=  x1  
  POL(ge(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(DIV_ACTIVE(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(div(x1, x2))=  x1  
  POL(if_active(x1, x2, x3))=  0  
  POL(IF_ACTIVE(x1, x2, x3))=  x2 + x3  

resulting in one new DP problem. 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polo
           →DP Problem 6
             ↳Polynomial Ordering


Dependency Pairs:

IFACTIVE(false, x, y) -> MARK(y)
MARK(div(x, y)) -> MARK(x)
IFACTIVE(true, x, y) -> MARK(x)
DIVACTIVE(s(x), s(y)) -> IFACTIVE(geactive(x, y), s(div(minus(x, y), s(y))), 0)
MARK(div(x, y)) -> DIVACTIVE(mark(x), y)
MARK(s(x)) -> MARK(x)


Rules:


minusactive(0, y) -> 0
minusactive(s(x), s(y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
minusactive(x, y) -> minus(x, y)
mark(0) -> 0
mark(s(x)) -> s(mark(x))
mark(minus(x, y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
mark(ge(x, y)) -> geactive(x, y)
mark(div(x, y)) -> divactive(mark(x), y)
mark(if(x, y, z)) -> ifactive(mark(x), y, z)
geactive(x, 0) -> true
geactive(0, s(y)) -> false
geactive(s(x), s(y)) -> geactive(x, y)
geactive(x, y) -> ge(x, y)
divactive(0, s(y)) -> 0
divactive(s(x), s(y)) -> ifactive(geactive(x, y), s(div(minus(x, y), s(y))), 0)
divactive(x, y) -> div(x, y)
ifactive(true, x, y) -> mark(x)
ifactive(false, x, y) -> mark(y)
ifactive(x, y, z) -> if(x, y, z)





The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

MARK(div(x, y)) -> MARK(x)


There are no usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(ge_active(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(MARK(x1))=  x1  
  POL(false)=  0  
  POL(div_active(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(minus(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(true)=  0  
  POL(mark(x1))=  0  
  POL(minus_active(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(if(x1, x2, x3))=  0  
  POL(0)=  0  
  POL(s(x1))=  x1  
  POL(ge(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(DIV_ACTIVE(x1, x2))=  1  
  POL(div(x1, x2))=  1 + x1  
  POL(if_active(x1, x2, x3))=  0  
  POL(IF_ACTIVE(x1, x2, x3))=  x2 + x3  

resulting in one new DP problem. 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polo
           →DP Problem 6
             ↳Polo
             ...
               →DP Problem 7
                 ↳Polynomial Ordering


Dependency Pairs:

IFACTIVE(false, x, y) -> MARK(y)
IFACTIVE(true, x, y) -> MARK(x)
DIVACTIVE(s(x), s(y)) -> IFACTIVE(geactive(x, y), s(div(minus(x, y), s(y))), 0)
MARK(div(x, y)) -> DIVACTIVE(mark(x), y)
MARK(s(x)) -> MARK(x)


Rules:


minusactive(0, y) -> 0
minusactive(s(x), s(y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
minusactive(x, y) -> minus(x, y)
mark(0) -> 0
mark(s(x)) -> s(mark(x))
mark(minus(x, y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
mark(ge(x, y)) -> geactive(x, y)
mark(div(x, y)) -> divactive(mark(x), y)
mark(if(x, y, z)) -> ifactive(mark(x), y, z)
geactive(x, 0) -> true
geactive(0, s(y)) -> false
geactive(s(x), s(y)) -> geactive(x, y)
geactive(x, y) -> ge(x, y)
divactive(0, s(y)) -> 0
divactive(s(x), s(y)) -> ifactive(geactive(x, y), s(div(minus(x, y), s(y))), 0)
divactive(x, y) -> div(x, y)
ifactive(true, x, y) -> mark(x)
ifactive(false, x, y) -> mark(y)
ifactive(x, y, z) -> if(x, y, z)





The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

MARK(s(x)) -> MARK(x)


Additionally, the following usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS can be oriented:

geactive(x, 0) -> true
geactive(0, s(y)) -> false
geactive(s(x), s(y)) -> geactive(x, y)
geactive(x, y) -> ge(x, y)
divactive(0, s(y)) -> 0
divactive(s(x), s(y)) -> ifactive(geactive(x, y), s(div(minus(x, y), s(y))), 0)
divactive(x, y) -> div(x, y)
mark(0) -> 0
mark(s(x)) -> s(mark(x))
mark(minus(x, y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
mark(ge(x, y)) -> geactive(x, y)
mark(div(x, y)) -> divactive(mark(x), y)
mark(if(x, y, z)) -> ifactive(mark(x), y, z)
ifactive(true, x, y) -> mark(x)
ifactive(false, x, y) -> mark(y)
ifactive(x, y, z) -> if(x, y, z)
minusactive(0, y) -> 0
minusactive(s(x), s(y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
minusactive(x, y) -> minus(x, y)


Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(ge_active(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(MARK(x1))=  x1  
  POL(false)=  0  
  POL(div_active(x1, x2))=  x1  
  POL(minus(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(true)=  0  
  POL(mark(x1))=  x1  
  POL(minus_active(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(if(x1, x2, x3))=  x2 + x3  
  POL(0)=  0  
  POL(s(x1))=  1 + x1  
  POL(ge(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(DIV_ACTIVE(x1, x2))=  x1  
  POL(div(x1, x2))=  x1  
  POL(if_active(x1, x2, x3))=  x2 + x3  
  POL(IF_ACTIVE(x1, x2, x3))=  x2 + x3  

resulting in one new DP problem. 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polo
           →DP Problem 6
             ↳Polo
             ...
               →DP Problem 8
                 ↳Polynomial Ordering


Dependency Pairs:

IFACTIVE(false, x, y) -> MARK(y)
IFACTIVE(true, x, y) -> MARK(x)
DIVACTIVE(s(x), s(y)) -> IFACTIVE(geactive(x, y), s(div(minus(x, y), s(y))), 0)
MARK(div(x, y)) -> DIVACTIVE(mark(x), y)


Rules:


minusactive(0, y) -> 0
minusactive(s(x), s(y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
minusactive(x, y) -> minus(x, y)
mark(0) -> 0
mark(s(x)) -> s(mark(x))
mark(minus(x, y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
mark(ge(x, y)) -> geactive(x, y)
mark(div(x, y)) -> divactive(mark(x), y)
mark(if(x, y, z)) -> ifactive(mark(x), y, z)
geactive(x, 0) -> true
geactive(0, s(y)) -> false
geactive(s(x), s(y)) -> geactive(x, y)
geactive(x, y) -> ge(x, y)
divactive(0, s(y)) -> 0
divactive(s(x), s(y)) -> ifactive(geactive(x, y), s(div(minus(x, y), s(y))), 0)
divactive(x, y) -> div(x, y)
ifactive(true, x, y) -> mark(x)
ifactive(false, x, y) -> mark(y)
ifactive(x, y, z) -> if(x, y, z)





The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

MARK(div(x, y)) -> DIVACTIVE(mark(x), y)


There are no usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(ge_active(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(MARK(x1))=  x1  
  POL(false)=  0  
  POL(div_active(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(minus(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(true)=  0  
  POL(mark(x1))=  0  
  POL(minus_active(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(if(x1, x2, x3))=  0  
  POL(0)=  0  
  POL(s(x1))=  0  
  POL(ge(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(DIV_ACTIVE(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(div(x1, x2))=  1  
  POL(if_active(x1, x2, x3))=  0  
  POL(IF_ACTIVE(x1, x2, x3))=  x2 + x3  

resulting in one new DP problem. 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polo
           →DP Problem 6
             ↳Polo
             ...
               →DP Problem 9
                 ↳Dependency Graph


Dependency Pairs:

IFACTIVE(false, x, y) -> MARK(y)
IFACTIVE(true, x, y) -> MARK(x)
DIVACTIVE(s(x), s(y)) -> IFACTIVE(geactive(x, y), s(div(minus(x, y), s(y))), 0)


Rules:


minusactive(0, y) -> 0
minusactive(s(x), s(y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
minusactive(x, y) -> minus(x, y)
mark(0) -> 0
mark(s(x)) -> s(mark(x))
mark(minus(x, y)) -> minusactive(x, y)
mark(ge(x, y)) -> geactive(x, y)
mark(div(x, y)) -> divactive(mark(x), y)
mark(if(x, y, z)) -> ifactive(mark(x), y, z)
geactive(x, 0) -> true
geactive(0, s(y)) -> false
geactive(s(x), s(y)) -> geactive(x, y)
geactive(x, y) -> ge(x, y)
divactive(0, s(y)) -> 0
divactive(s(x), s(y)) -> ifactive(geactive(x, y), s(div(minus(x, y), s(y))), 0)
divactive(x, y) -> div(x, y)
ifactive(true, x, y) -> mark(x)
ifactive(false, x, y) -> mark(y)
ifactive(x, y, z) -> if(x, y, z)





Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:01 minutes