Term Rewriting System R:
[y, x]
le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(0, y) -> 0
minus(s(x), y) -> ifminus(le(s(x), y), s(x), y)
ifminus(true, s(x), y) -> 0
ifminus(false, s(x), y) -> s(minus(x, y))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
log(s(0)) -> 0
log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(quot(x, s(s(0))))))

Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

LE(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(x, y)
MINUS(s(x), y) -> IFMINUS(le(s(x), y), s(x), y)
MINUS(s(x), y) -> LE(s(x), y)
IFMINUS(false, s(x), y) -> MINUS(x, y)
QUOT(s(x), s(y)) -> QUOT(minus(x, y), s(y))
QUOT(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)
LOG(s(s(x))) -> LOG(s(quot(x, s(s(0)))))
LOG(s(s(x))) -> QUOT(x, s(s(0)))

Furthermore, R contains four SCCs. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polynomial Ordering
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pair:

LE(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(x, y)


Rules:


le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(0, y) -> 0
minus(s(x), y) -> ifminus(le(s(x), y), s(x), y)
ifminus(true, s(x), y) -> 0
ifminus(false, s(x), y) -> s(minus(x, y))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
log(s(0)) -> 0
log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(quot(x, s(s(0))))))





The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

LE(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(x, y)


There are no usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(LE(x1, x2))=  x1  
  POL(s(x1))=  1 + x1  

resulting in one new DP problem. 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
           →DP Problem 5
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(0, y) -> 0
minus(s(x), y) -> ifminus(le(s(x), y), s(x), y)
ifminus(true, s(x), y) -> 0
ifminus(false, s(x), y) -> s(minus(x, y))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
log(s(0)) -> 0
log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(quot(x, s(s(0))))))





Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polynomial Ordering
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pairs:

IFMINUS(false, s(x), y) -> MINUS(x, y)
MINUS(s(x), y) -> IFMINUS(le(s(x), y), s(x), y)


Rules:


le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(0, y) -> 0
minus(s(x), y) -> ifminus(le(s(x), y), s(x), y)
ifminus(true, s(x), y) -> 0
ifminus(false, s(x), y) -> s(minus(x, y))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
log(s(0)) -> 0
log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(quot(x, s(s(0))))))





The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

IFMINUS(false, s(x), y) -> MINUS(x, y)


There are no usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(IF_MINUS(x1, x2, x3))=  x2  
  POL(0)=  0  
  POL(false)=  0  
  POL(MINUS(x1, x2))=  x1  
  POL(true)=  0  
  POL(s(x1))=  1 + x1  
  POL(le(x1, x2))=  0  

resulting in one new DP problem. 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
           →DP Problem 6
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pair:

MINUS(s(x), y) -> IFMINUS(le(s(x), y), s(x), y)


Rules:


le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(0, y) -> 0
minus(s(x), y) -> ifminus(le(s(x), y), s(x), y)
ifminus(true, s(x), y) -> 0
ifminus(false, s(x), y) -> s(minus(x, y))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
log(s(0)) -> 0
log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(quot(x, s(s(0))))))





Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polynomial Ordering
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pair:

QUOT(s(x), s(y)) -> QUOT(minus(x, y), s(y))


Rules:


le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(0, y) -> 0
minus(s(x), y) -> ifminus(le(s(x), y), s(x), y)
ifminus(true, s(x), y) -> 0
ifminus(false, s(x), y) -> s(minus(x, y))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
log(s(0)) -> 0
log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(quot(x, s(s(0))))))





The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

QUOT(s(x), s(y)) -> QUOT(minus(x, y), s(y))


Additionally, the following usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS can be oriented:

minus(0, y) -> 0
minus(s(x), y) -> ifminus(le(s(x), y), s(x), y)
ifminus(true, s(x), y) -> 0
ifminus(false, s(x), y) -> s(minus(x, y))


Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(QUOT(x1, x2))=  x1  
  POL(0)=  0  
  POL(false)=  0  
  POL(minus(x1, x2))=  x1  
  POL(true)=  0  
  POL(s(x1))=  1 + x1  
  POL(if_minus(x1, x2, x3))=  x2  
  POL(le(x1, x2))=  0  

resulting in one new DP problem. 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polo
           →DP Problem 7
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(0, y) -> 0
minus(s(x), y) -> ifminus(le(s(x), y), s(x), y)
ifminus(true, s(x), y) -> 0
ifminus(false, s(x), y) -> s(minus(x, y))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
log(s(0)) -> 0
log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(quot(x, s(s(0))))))





Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳Narrowing Transformation


Dependency Pair:

LOG(s(s(x))) -> LOG(s(quot(x, s(s(0)))))


Rules:


le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(0, y) -> 0
minus(s(x), y) -> ifminus(le(s(x), y), s(x), y)
ifminus(true, s(x), y) -> 0
ifminus(false, s(x), y) -> s(minus(x, y))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
log(s(0)) -> 0
log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(quot(x, s(s(0))))))





On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

LOG(s(s(x))) -> LOG(s(quot(x, s(s(0)))))
two new Dependency Pairs are created:

LOG(s(s(0))) -> LOG(s(0))
LOG(s(s(s(x'')))) -> LOG(s(s(quot(minus(x'', s(0)), s(s(0))))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳Nar
           →DP Problem 8
             ↳Narrowing Transformation


Dependency Pair:

LOG(s(s(s(x'')))) -> LOG(s(s(quot(minus(x'', s(0)), s(s(0))))))


Rules:


le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(0, y) -> 0
minus(s(x), y) -> ifminus(le(s(x), y), s(x), y)
ifminus(true, s(x), y) -> 0
ifminus(false, s(x), y) -> s(minus(x, y))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
log(s(0)) -> 0
log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(quot(x, s(s(0))))))





On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

LOG(s(s(s(x'')))) -> LOG(s(s(quot(minus(x'', s(0)), s(s(0))))))
two new Dependency Pairs are created:

LOG(s(s(s(0)))) -> LOG(s(s(quot(0, s(s(0))))))
LOG(s(s(s(s(x'))))) -> LOG(s(s(quot(ifminus(le(s(x'), s(0)), s(x'), s(0)), s(s(0))))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳Nar
           →DP Problem 8
             ↳Nar
             ...
               →DP Problem 9
                 ↳Polynomial Ordering


Dependency Pairs:

LOG(s(s(s(s(x'))))) -> LOG(s(s(quot(ifminus(le(s(x'), s(0)), s(x'), s(0)), s(s(0))))))
LOG(s(s(s(0)))) -> LOG(s(s(quot(0, s(s(0))))))


Rules:


le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(0, y) -> 0
minus(s(x), y) -> ifminus(le(s(x), y), s(x), y)
ifminus(true, s(x), y) -> 0
ifminus(false, s(x), y) -> s(minus(x, y))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
log(s(0)) -> 0
log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(quot(x, s(s(0))))))





The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

LOG(s(s(s(s(x'))))) -> LOG(s(s(quot(ifminus(le(s(x'), s(0)), s(x'), s(0)), s(s(0))))))
LOG(s(s(s(0)))) -> LOG(s(s(quot(0, s(s(0))))))


Additionally, the following usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS can be oriented:

minus(0, y) -> 0
minus(s(x), y) -> ifminus(le(s(x), y), s(x), y)
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
ifminus(true, s(x), y) -> 0
ifminus(false, s(x), y) -> s(minus(x, y))


Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(0)=  0  
  POL(false)=  0  
  POL(minus(x1, x2))=  x1  
  POL(quot(x1, x2))=  x1  
  POL(true)=  0  
  POL(s(x1))=  1 + x1  
  POL(if_minus(x1, x2, x3))=  x2  
  POL(le(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(LOG(x1))=  1 + x1  

resulting in one new DP problem. 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳Nar
           →DP Problem 8
             ↳Nar
             ...
               →DP Problem 10
                 ↳Dependency Graph


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(0, y) -> 0
minus(s(x), y) -> ifminus(le(s(x), y), s(x), y)
ifminus(true, s(x), y) -> 0
ifminus(false, s(x), y) -> s(minus(x, y))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
log(s(0)) -> 0
log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(quot(x, s(s(0))))))





Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes