Term Rewriting System R:
[y, x]
le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
pred(s(x)) -> x
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> ifmod(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifmod(true, s(x), s(y)) -> mod(minus(x, y), s(y))
ifmod(false, s(x), s(y)) -> s(x)

Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

LE(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(x, y)
MINUS(x, s(y)) -> PRED(minus(x, y))
MINUS(x, s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)
MOD(s(x), s(y)) -> IFMOD(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
MOD(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(y, x)
IFMOD(true, s(x), s(y)) -> MOD(minus(x, y), s(y))
IFMOD(true, s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)

Furthermore, R contains three SCCs. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS


Dependency Pair:

LE(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(x, y)


Rules:


le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
pred(s(x)) -> x
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> ifmod(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifmod(true, s(x), s(y)) -> mod(minus(x, y), s(y))
ifmod(false, s(x), s(y)) -> s(x)





The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

LE(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(x, y)


The following rules can be oriented:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
pred(s(x)) -> x
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> ifmod(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifmod(true, s(x), s(y)) -> mod(minus(x, y), s(y))
ifmod(false, s(x), s(y)) -> s(x)


Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(LE(x1, x2))=  1 + x1 + x2  
  POL(0)=  0  
  POL(false)=  0  
  POL(mod(x1, x2))=  x1 + x2  
  POL(pred(x1))=  x1  
  POL(if_mod(x1, x2))=  x1 + x2  
  POL(true)=  0  
  POL(s(x1))=  1 + x1  
  POL(le(x1, x2))=  x1 + x2  

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
LE(x1, x2) -> LE(x1, x2)
s(x1) -> s(x1)
le(x1, x2) -> le(x1, x2)
pred(x1) -> pred(x1)
minus(x1, x2) -> x1
mod(x1, x2) -> mod(x1, x2)
ifmod(x1, x2, x3) -> ifmod(x2, x3)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 4
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
pred(s(x)) -> x
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> ifmod(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifmod(true, s(x), s(y)) -> mod(minus(x, y), s(y))
ifmod(false, s(x), s(y)) -> s(x)





Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS


Dependency Pair:

MINUS(x, s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)


Rules:


le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
pred(s(x)) -> x
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> ifmod(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifmod(true, s(x), s(y)) -> mod(minus(x, y), s(y))
ifmod(false, s(x), s(y)) -> s(x)





The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

MINUS(x, s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)


The following rules can be oriented:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
pred(s(x)) -> x
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> ifmod(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifmod(true, s(x), s(y)) -> mod(minus(x, y), s(y))
ifmod(false, s(x), s(y)) -> s(x)


Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(0)=  0  
  POL(false)=  0  
  POL(mod(x1, x2))=  x1 + x2  
  POL(pred(x1))=  x1  
  POL(MINUS(x1, x2))=  1 + x1 + x2  
  POL(if_mod(x1, x2))=  x1 + x2  
  POL(true)=  0  
  POL(s(x1))=  1 + x1  
  POL(le(x1, x2))=  x1 + x2  

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
MINUS(x1, x2) -> MINUS(x1, x2)
s(x1) -> s(x1)
le(x1, x2) -> le(x1, x2)
pred(x1) -> pred(x1)
minus(x1, x2) -> x1
mod(x1, x2) -> mod(x1, x2)
ifmod(x1, x2, x3) -> ifmod(x2, x3)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 5
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
pred(s(x)) -> x
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> ifmod(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifmod(true, s(x), s(y)) -> mod(minus(x, y), s(y))
ifmod(false, s(x), s(y)) -> s(x)





Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering


Dependency Pairs:

IFMOD(true, s(x), s(y)) -> MOD(minus(x, y), s(y))
MOD(s(x), s(y)) -> IFMOD(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))


Rules:


le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
pred(s(x)) -> x
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> ifmod(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifmod(true, s(x), s(y)) -> mod(minus(x, y), s(y))
ifmod(false, s(x), s(y)) -> s(x)





The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

MOD(s(x), s(y)) -> IFMOD(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))


The following rules can be oriented:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
pred(s(x)) -> x
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> ifmod(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifmod(true, s(x), s(y)) -> mod(minus(x, y), s(y))
ifmod(false, s(x), s(y)) -> s(x)


Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(0)=  0  
  POL(MOD(x1, x2))=  1 + x1 + x2  
  POL(false)=  0  
  POL(mod(x1, x2))=  x1 + x2  
  POL(pred(x1))=  x1  
  POL(if_mod(x1, x2, x3))=  x1 + x2 + x3  
  POL(true)=  0  
  POL(s(x1))=  1 + x1  
  POL(IF_MOD(x1, x2, x3))=  x1 + x2 + x3  
  POL(le)=  0  

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
MOD(x1, x2) -> MOD(x1, x2)
IFMOD(x1, x2, x3) -> IFMOD(x1, x2, x3)
s(x1) -> s(x1)
le(x1, x2) -> le
minus(x1, x2) -> x1
pred(x1) -> pred(x1)
mod(x1, x2) -> mod(x1, x2)
ifmod(x1, x2, x3) -> ifmod(x1, x2, x3)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 6
             ↳Dependency Graph


Dependency Pair:

IFMOD(true, s(x), s(y)) -> MOD(minus(x, y), s(y))


Rules:


le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
pred(s(x)) -> x
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> ifmod(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifmod(true, s(x), s(y)) -> mod(minus(x, y), s(y))
ifmod(false, s(x), s(y)) -> s(x)





Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes