Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y, h, i, u, v]
eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(x)) -> false
eq(s(x), 0) -> false
eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
or(true, y) -> true
or(false, y) -> y
union(empty, h) -> h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
ifreach2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
ifreach2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))

Termination of R to be shown.

`   R`
`     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis`

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

EQ(s(x), s(y)) -> EQ(x, y)
UNION(edge(x, y, i), h) -> UNION(i, h)
REACH(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> IFREACH1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
REACH(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> EQ(x, u)
IFREACH1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> IFREACH2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
IFREACH1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> EQ(y, v)
IFREACH1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> REACH(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
IFREACH2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> OR(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))
IFREACH2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> REACH(x, y, i, h)
IFREACH2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> REACH(v, y, union(i, h), empty)
IFREACH2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> UNION(i, h)

Furthermore, R contains three SCCs.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

EQ(s(x), s(y)) -> EQ(x, y)

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(x)) -> false
eq(s(x), 0) -> false
eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
or(true, y) -> true
or(false, y) -> y
union(empty, h) -> h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
ifreach2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
ifreach2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

EQ(s(x), s(y)) -> EQ(x, y)

There are no usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(EQ(x1, x2)) =  x1 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 4`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(x)) -> false
eq(s(x), 0) -> false
eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
or(true, y) -> true
or(false, y) -> y
union(empty, h) -> h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
ifreach2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
ifreach2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

UNION(edge(x, y, i), h) -> UNION(i, h)

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(x)) -> false
eq(s(x), 0) -> false
eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
or(true, y) -> true
or(false, y) -> y
union(empty, h) -> h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
ifreach2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
ifreach2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

UNION(edge(x, y, i), h) -> UNION(i, h)

There are no usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(edge(x1, x2, x3)) =  1 + x3 POL(UNION(x1, x2)) =  x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 5`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(x)) -> false
eq(s(x), 0) -> false
eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
or(true, y) -> true
or(false, y) -> y
union(empty, h) -> h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
ifreach2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
ifreach2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Narrowing Transformation`

Dependency Pairs:

IFREACH1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> REACH(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
IFREACH2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> REACH(v, y, union(i, h), empty)
IFREACH2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> REACH(x, y, i, h)
IFREACH1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> IFREACH2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
REACH(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> IFREACH1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(x)) -> false
eq(s(x), 0) -> false
eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
or(true, y) -> true
or(false, y) -> y
union(empty, h) -> h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
ifreach2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
ifreach2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IFREACH2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> REACH(v, y, union(i, h), empty)
two new Dependency Pairs are created:

IFREACH2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, empty), h'') -> REACH(v, y, h'', empty)
IFREACH2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, edge(x'', y'', i'')), h'') -> REACH(v, y, edge(x'', y'', union(i'', h'')), empty)

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`
`           →DP Problem 6`
`             ↳Polynomial Ordering`

Dependency Pairs:

IFREACH2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, edge(x'', y'', i'')), h'') -> REACH(v, y, edge(x'', y'', union(i'', h'')), empty)
IFREACH2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, empty), h'') -> REACH(v, y, h'', empty)
IFREACH2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> REACH(x, y, i, h)
IFREACH1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> IFREACH2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
REACH(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> IFREACH1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
IFREACH1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> REACH(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(x)) -> false
eq(s(x), 0) -> false
eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
or(true, y) -> true
or(false, y) -> y
union(empty, h) -> h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
ifreach2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
ifreach2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

IFREACH2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, edge(x'', y'', i'')), h'') -> REACH(v, y, edge(x'', y'', union(i'', h'')), empty)
IFREACH2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, empty), h'') -> REACH(v, y, h'', empty)
IFREACH2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> REACH(x, y, i, h)

Additionally, the following usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS can be oriented:

union(empty, h) -> h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(edge(x1, x2, x3)) =  1 + x3 POL(eq(x1, x2)) =  0 POL(0) =  0 POL(false) =  0 POL(union(x1, x2)) =  x1 + x2 POL(IF_REACH_2(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)) =  x4 + x5 POL(REACH(x1, x2, x3, x4)) =  x3 + x4 POL(true) =  0 POL(s(x1)) =  0 POL(empty) =  0 POL(IF_REACH_1(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)) =  x4 + x5

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`
`           →DP Problem 6`
`             ↳Polo`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 7`
`                 ↳Dependency Graph`

Dependency Pairs:

IFREACH1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> IFREACH2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
REACH(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> IFREACH1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
IFREACH1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> REACH(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(x)) -> false
eq(s(x), 0) -> false
eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
or(true, y) -> true
or(false, y) -> y
union(empty, h) -> h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
ifreach2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
ifreach2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))

Using the Dependency Graph the DP problem was split into 1 DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`
`           →DP Problem 6`
`             ↳Polo`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 8`
`                 ↳Instantiation Transformation`

Dependency Pairs:

IFREACH1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> REACH(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
REACH(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> IFREACH1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(x)) -> false
eq(s(x), 0) -> false
eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
or(true, y) -> true
or(false, y) -> y
union(empty, h) -> h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
ifreach2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
ifreach2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))

On this DP problem, an Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

REACH(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> IFREACH1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
one new Dependency Pair is created:

REACH(x'', y'', edge(u'', v0, i''), edge(u''', v'', h'')) -> IFREACH1(eq(x'', u''), x'', y'', edge(u'', v0, i''), edge(u''', v'', h''))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`
`           →DP Problem 6`
`             ↳Polo`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 9`
`                 ↳Instantiation Transformation`

Dependency Pairs:

REACH(x'', y'', edge(u'', v0, i''), edge(u''', v'', h'')) -> IFREACH1(eq(x'', u''), x'', y'', edge(u'', v0, i''), edge(u''', v'', h''))
IFREACH1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> REACH(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(x)) -> false
eq(s(x), 0) -> false
eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
or(true, y) -> true
or(false, y) -> y
union(empty, h) -> h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
ifreach2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
ifreach2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))

On this DP problem, an Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IFREACH1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> REACH(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
one new Dependency Pair is created:

IFREACH1(false, x', y', edge(u', v', i'), edge(u'''''', v'''', h'''')) -> REACH(x', y', i', edge(u', v', edge(u'''''', v'''', h'''')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`
`           →DP Problem 6`
`             ↳Polo`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 10`
`                 ↳Instantiation Transformation`

Dependency Pairs:

IFREACH1(false, x', y', edge(u', v', i'), edge(u'''''', v'''', h'''')) -> REACH(x', y', i', edge(u', v', edge(u'''''', v'''', h'''')))
REACH(x'', y'', edge(u'', v0, i''), edge(u''', v'', h'')) -> IFREACH1(eq(x'', u''), x'', y'', edge(u'', v0, i''), edge(u''', v'', h''))

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(x)) -> false
eq(s(x), 0) -> false
eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
or(true, y) -> true
or(false, y) -> y
union(empty, h) -> h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
ifreach2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
ifreach2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))

On this DP problem, an Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

REACH(x'', y'', edge(u'', v0, i''), edge(u''', v'', h'')) -> IFREACH1(eq(x'', u''), x'', y'', edge(u'', v0, i''), edge(u''', v'', h''))
one new Dependency Pair is created:

REACH(x'''', y'''', edge(u''0, v0', i''''), edge(u'''', v'''', edge(u'''''''', v'''''', h''''''))) -> IFREACH1(eq(x'''', u''0), x'''', y'''', edge(u''0, v0', i''''), edge(u'''', v'''', edge(u'''''''', v'''''', h'''''')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`
`           →DP Problem 6`
`             ↳Polo`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 11`
`                 ↳Instantiation Transformation`

Dependency Pairs:

REACH(x'''', y'''', edge(u''0, v0', i''''), edge(u'''', v'''', edge(u'''''''', v'''''', h''''''))) -> IFREACH1(eq(x'''', u''0), x'''', y'''', edge(u''0, v0', i''''), edge(u'''', v'''', edge(u'''''''', v'''''', h'''''')))
IFREACH1(false, x', y', edge(u', v', i'), edge(u'''''', v'''', h'''')) -> REACH(x', y', i', edge(u', v', edge(u'''''', v'''', h'''')))

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(x)) -> false
eq(s(x), 0) -> false
eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
or(true, y) -> true
or(false, y) -> y
union(empty, h) -> h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
ifreach2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
ifreach2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))

On this DP problem, an Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IFREACH1(false, x', y', edge(u', v', i'), edge(u'''''', v'''', h'''')) -> REACH(x', y', i', edge(u', v', edge(u'''''', v'''', h'''')))
one new Dependency Pair is created:

IFREACH1(false, x''', y'', edge(u'', v'', i''), edge(u''''''', v'''''', edge(u'''''''''', v'''''''', h''''''''))) -> REACH(x''', y'', i'', edge(u'', v'', edge(u''''''', v'''''', edge(u'''''''''', v'''''''', h''''''''))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`
`           →DP Problem 6`
`             ↳Polo`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 12`
`                 ↳Polynomial Ordering`

Dependency Pairs:

IFREACH1(false, x''', y'', edge(u'', v'', i''), edge(u''''''', v'''''', edge(u'''''''''', v'''''''', h''''''''))) -> REACH(x''', y'', i'', edge(u'', v'', edge(u''''''', v'''''', edge(u'''''''''', v'''''''', h''''''''))))
REACH(x'''', y'''', edge(u''0, v0', i''''), edge(u'''', v'''', edge(u'''''''', v'''''', h''''''))) -> IFREACH1(eq(x'''', u''0), x'''', y'''', edge(u''0, v0', i''''), edge(u'''', v'''', edge(u'''''''', v'''''', h'''''')))

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(x)) -> false
eq(s(x), 0) -> false
eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
or(true, y) -> true
or(false, y) -> y
union(empty, h) -> h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
ifreach2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
ifreach2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

IFREACH1(false, x''', y'', edge(u'', v'', i''), edge(u''''''', v'''''', edge(u'''''''''', v'''''''', h''''''''))) -> REACH(x''', y'', i'', edge(u'', v'', edge(u''''''', v'''''', edge(u'''''''''', v'''''''', h''''''''))))

There are no usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(edge(x1, x2, x3)) =  1 + x3 POL(eq(x1, x2)) =  0 POL(0) =  0 POL(false) =  0 POL(REACH(x1, x2, x3, x4)) =  x3 POL(true) =  0 POL(s(x1)) =  0 POL(IF_REACH_1(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)) =  x4

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`
`           →DP Problem 6`
`             ↳Polo`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 13`
`                 ↳Dependency Graph`

Dependency Pair:

REACH(x'''', y'''', edge(u''0, v0', i''''), edge(u'''', v'''', edge(u'''''''', v'''''', h''''''))) -> IFREACH1(eq(x'''', u''0), x'''', y'''', edge(u''0, v0', i''''), edge(u'''', v'''', edge(u'''''''', v'''''', h'''''')))

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(x)) -> false
eq(s(x), 0) -> false
eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
or(true, y) -> true
or(false, y) -> y
union(empty, h) -> h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> ifreach2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
ifreach1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
ifreach2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
ifreach2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes