Term Rewriting System R:
[y, x, n, m]
le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
app(nil, y) -> y
app(add(n, x), y) -> add(n, app(x, y))
low(n, nil) -> nil
low(n, add(m, x)) -> iflow(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
iflow(true, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, low(n, x))
iflow(false, n, add(m, x)) -> low(n, x)
high(n, nil) -> nil
high(n, add(m, x)) -> ifhigh(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
ifhigh(true, n, add(m, x)) -> high(n, x)
ifhigh(false, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, high(n, x))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(add(n, x)) -> app(quicksort(low(n, x)), add(n, quicksort(high(n, x))))

Termination of R to be shown.

`   R`
`     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis`

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

LE(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(x, y)
APP(add(n, x), y) -> APP(x, y)
LOW(n, add(m, x)) -> IFLOW(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
LOW(n, add(m, x)) -> LE(m, n)
IFLOW(true, n, add(m, x)) -> LOW(n, x)
IFLOW(false, n, add(m, x)) -> LOW(n, x)
HIGH(n, add(m, x)) -> IFHIGH(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
HIGH(n, add(m, x)) -> LE(m, n)
IFHIGH(true, n, add(m, x)) -> HIGH(n, x)
IFHIGH(false, n, add(m, x)) -> HIGH(n, x)
QUICKSORT(add(n, x)) -> APP(quicksort(low(n, x)), add(n, quicksort(high(n, x))))
QUICKSORT(add(n, x)) -> QUICKSORT(low(n, x))
QUICKSORT(add(n, x)) -> LOW(n, x)
QUICKSORT(add(n, x)) -> QUICKSORT(high(n, x))
QUICKSORT(add(n, x)) -> HIGH(n, x)

Furthermore, R contains five SCCs.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 4`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 5`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

LE(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(x, y)

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
app(nil, y) -> y
app(add(n, x), y) -> add(n, app(x, y))
low(n, nil) -> nil
low(n, add(m, x)) -> iflow(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
iflow(true, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, low(n, x))
iflow(false, n, add(m, x)) -> low(n, x)
high(n, nil) -> nil
high(n, add(m, x)) -> ifhigh(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
ifhigh(true, n, add(m, x)) -> high(n, x)
ifhigh(false, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, high(n, x))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(add(n, x)) -> app(quicksort(low(n, x)), add(n, quicksort(high(n, x))))

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

LE(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(x, y)

There are no usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(LE(x1, x2)) =  x1 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 6`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 4`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 5`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
app(nil, y) -> y
app(add(n, x), y) -> add(n, app(x, y))
low(n, nil) -> nil
low(n, add(m, x)) -> iflow(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
iflow(true, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, low(n, x))
iflow(false, n, add(m, x)) -> low(n, x)
high(n, nil) -> nil
high(n, add(m, x)) -> ifhigh(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
ifhigh(true, n, add(m, x)) -> high(n, x)
ifhigh(false, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, high(n, x))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(add(n, x)) -> app(quicksort(low(n, x)), add(n, quicksort(high(n, x))))

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 4`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 5`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

APP(add(n, x), y) -> APP(x, y)

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
app(nil, y) -> y
app(add(n, x), y) -> add(n, app(x, y))
low(n, nil) -> nil
low(n, add(m, x)) -> iflow(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
iflow(true, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, low(n, x))
iflow(false, n, add(m, x)) -> low(n, x)
high(n, nil) -> nil
high(n, add(m, x)) -> ifhigh(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
ifhigh(true, n, add(m, x)) -> high(n, x)
ifhigh(false, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, high(n, x))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(add(n, x)) -> app(quicksort(low(n, x)), add(n, quicksort(high(n, x))))

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

APP(add(n, x), y) -> APP(x, y)

There are no usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(APP(x1, x2)) =  x1 POL(add(x1, x2)) =  1 + x2

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 7`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 4`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 5`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
app(nil, y) -> y
app(add(n, x), y) -> add(n, app(x, y))
low(n, nil) -> nil
low(n, add(m, x)) -> iflow(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
iflow(true, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, low(n, x))
iflow(false, n, add(m, x)) -> low(n, x)
high(n, nil) -> nil
high(n, add(m, x)) -> ifhigh(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
ifhigh(true, n, add(m, x)) -> high(n, x)
ifhigh(false, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, high(n, x))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(add(n, x)) -> app(quicksort(low(n, x)), add(n, quicksort(high(n, x))))

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 4`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 5`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pairs:

IFLOW(false, n, add(m, x)) -> LOW(n, x)
IFLOW(true, n, add(m, x)) -> LOW(n, x)
LOW(n, add(m, x)) -> IFLOW(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
app(nil, y) -> y
app(add(n, x), y) -> add(n, app(x, y))
low(n, nil) -> nil
low(n, add(m, x)) -> iflow(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
iflow(true, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, low(n, x))
iflow(false, n, add(m, x)) -> low(n, x)
high(n, nil) -> nil
high(n, add(m, x)) -> ifhigh(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
ifhigh(true, n, add(m, x)) -> high(n, x)
ifhigh(false, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, high(n, x))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(add(n, x)) -> app(quicksort(low(n, x)), add(n, quicksort(high(n, x))))

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

IFLOW(false, n, add(m, x)) -> LOW(n, x)
IFLOW(true, n, add(m, x)) -> LOW(n, x)

There are no usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(0) =  0 POL(LOW(x1, x2)) =  x2 POL(false) =  0 POL(IF_LOW(x1, x2, x3)) =  x3 POL(true) =  0 POL(s(x1)) =  0 POL(le(x1, x2)) =  0 POL(add(x1, x2)) =  1 + x2

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 8`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 4`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 5`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

LOW(n, add(m, x)) -> IFLOW(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
app(nil, y) -> y
app(add(n, x), y) -> add(n, app(x, y))
low(n, nil) -> nil
low(n, add(m, x)) -> iflow(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
iflow(true, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, low(n, x))
iflow(false, n, add(m, x)) -> low(n, x)
high(n, nil) -> nil
high(n, add(m, x)) -> ifhigh(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
ifhigh(true, n, add(m, x)) -> high(n, x)
ifhigh(false, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, high(n, x))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(add(n, x)) -> app(quicksort(low(n, x)), add(n, quicksort(high(n, x))))

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 4`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 5`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pairs:

IFHIGH(false, n, add(m, x)) -> HIGH(n, x)
IFHIGH(true, n, add(m, x)) -> HIGH(n, x)
HIGH(n, add(m, x)) -> IFHIGH(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
app(nil, y) -> y
app(add(n, x), y) -> add(n, app(x, y))
low(n, nil) -> nil
low(n, add(m, x)) -> iflow(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
iflow(true, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, low(n, x))
iflow(false, n, add(m, x)) -> low(n, x)
high(n, nil) -> nil
high(n, add(m, x)) -> ifhigh(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
ifhigh(true, n, add(m, x)) -> high(n, x)
ifhigh(false, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, high(n, x))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(add(n, x)) -> app(quicksort(low(n, x)), add(n, quicksort(high(n, x))))

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

IFHIGH(false, n, add(m, x)) -> HIGH(n, x)
IFHIGH(true, n, add(m, x)) -> HIGH(n, x)

There are no usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(0) =  0 POL(false) =  0 POL(IF_HIGH(x1, x2, x3)) =  x3 POL(HIGH(x1, x2)) =  x2 POL(true) =  0 POL(s(x1)) =  0 POL(le(x1, x2)) =  0 POL(add(x1, x2)) =  1 + x2

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 4`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 9`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 5`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

HIGH(n, add(m, x)) -> IFHIGH(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
app(nil, y) -> y
app(add(n, x), y) -> add(n, app(x, y))
low(n, nil) -> nil
low(n, add(m, x)) -> iflow(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
iflow(true, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, low(n, x))
iflow(false, n, add(m, x)) -> low(n, x)
high(n, nil) -> nil
high(n, add(m, x)) -> ifhigh(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
ifhigh(true, n, add(m, x)) -> high(n, x)
ifhigh(false, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, high(n, x))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(add(n, x)) -> app(quicksort(low(n, x)), add(n, quicksort(high(n, x))))

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 4`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 5`
`         ↳Narrowing Transformation`

Dependency Pairs:

QUICKSORT(add(n, x)) -> QUICKSORT(high(n, x))
QUICKSORT(add(n, x)) -> QUICKSORT(low(n, x))

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
app(nil, y) -> y
app(add(n, x), y) -> add(n, app(x, y))
low(n, nil) -> nil
low(n, add(m, x)) -> iflow(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
iflow(true, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, low(n, x))
iflow(false, n, add(m, x)) -> low(n, x)
high(n, nil) -> nil
high(n, add(m, x)) -> ifhigh(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
ifhigh(true, n, add(m, x)) -> high(n, x)
ifhigh(false, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, high(n, x))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(add(n, x)) -> app(quicksort(low(n, x)), add(n, quicksort(high(n, x))))

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

QUICKSORT(add(n, x)) -> QUICKSORT(low(n, x))
two new Dependency Pairs are created:

QUICKSORT(add(n'', nil)) -> QUICKSORT(nil)
QUICKSORT(add(n'', add(m', x''))) -> QUICKSORT(iflow(le(m', n''), n'', add(m', x'')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 4`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 5`
`         ↳Nar`
`           →DP Problem 10`
`             ↳Narrowing Transformation`

Dependency Pairs:

QUICKSORT(add(n'', add(m', x''))) -> QUICKSORT(iflow(le(m', n''), n'', add(m', x'')))
QUICKSORT(add(n, x)) -> QUICKSORT(high(n, x))

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
app(nil, y) -> y
app(add(n, x), y) -> add(n, app(x, y))
low(n, nil) -> nil
low(n, add(m, x)) -> iflow(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
iflow(true, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, low(n, x))
iflow(false, n, add(m, x)) -> low(n, x)
high(n, nil) -> nil
high(n, add(m, x)) -> ifhigh(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
ifhigh(true, n, add(m, x)) -> high(n, x)
ifhigh(false, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, high(n, x))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(add(n, x)) -> app(quicksort(low(n, x)), add(n, quicksort(high(n, x))))

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

QUICKSORT(add(n, x)) -> QUICKSORT(high(n, x))
two new Dependency Pairs are created:

QUICKSORT(add(n'', nil)) -> QUICKSORT(nil)
QUICKSORT(add(n'', add(m', x''))) -> QUICKSORT(ifhigh(le(m', n''), n'', add(m', x'')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 4`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 5`
`         ↳Nar`
`           →DP Problem 10`
`             ↳Nar`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 11`
`                 ↳Polynomial Ordering`

Dependency Pairs:

QUICKSORT(add(n'', add(m', x''))) -> QUICKSORT(ifhigh(le(m', n''), n'', add(m', x'')))
QUICKSORT(add(n'', add(m', x''))) -> QUICKSORT(iflow(le(m', n''), n'', add(m', x'')))

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
app(nil, y) -> y
app(add(n, x), y) -> add(n, app(x, y))
low(n, nil) -> nil
low(n, add(m, x)) -> iflow(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
iflow(true, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, low(n, x))
iflow(false, n, add(m, x)) -> low(n, x)
high(n, nil) -> nil
high(n, add(m, x)) -> ifhigh(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
ifhigh(true, n, add(m, x)) -> high(n, x)
ifhigh(false, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, high(n, x))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(add(n, x)) -> app(quicksort(low(n, x)), add(n, quicksort(high(n, x))))

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

QUICKSORT(add(n'', add(m', x''))) -> QUICKSORT(ifhigh(le(m', n''), n'', add(m', x'')))
QUICKSORT(add(n'', add(m', x''))) -> QUICKSORT(iflow(le(m', n''), n'', add(m', x'')))

Additionally, the following usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS can be oriented:

high(n, nil) -> nil
high(n, add(m, x)) -> ifhigh(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
ifhigh(true, n, add(m, x)) -> high(n, x)
ifhigh(false, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, high(n, x))
iflow(true, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, low(n, x))
iflow(false, n, add(m, x)) -> low(n, x)
low(n, nil) -> nil
low(n, add(m, x)) -> iflow(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(QUICKSORT(x1)) =  1 + x1 POL(0) =  0 POL(if_low(x1, x2, x3)) =  x3 POL(false) =  0 POL(high(x1, x2)) =  x2 POL(if_high(x1, x2, x3)) =  x3 POL(low(x1, x2)) =  x2 POL(nil) =  0 POL(true) =  0 POL(s(x1)) =  0 POL(le(x1, x2)) =  0 POL(add(x1, x2)) =  1 + x2

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 4`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 5`
`         ↳Nar`
`           →DP Problem 10`
`             ↳Nar`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 12`
`                 ↳Dependency Graph`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
app(nil, y) -> y
app(add(n, x), y) -> add(n, app(x, y))
low(n, nil) -> nil
low(n, add(m, x)) -> iflow(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
iflow(true, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, low(n, x))
iflow(false, n, add(m, x)) -> low(n, x)
high(n, nil) -> nil
high(n, add(m, x)) -> ifhigh(le(m, n), n, add(m, x))
ifhigh(true, n, add(m, x)) -> high(n, x)
ifhigh(false, n, add(m, x)) -> add(m, high(n, x))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(add(n, x)) -> app(quicksort(low(n, x)), add(n, quicksort(high(n, x))))

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes