Termination Proof using AProVE

Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y]
O(0) -> 0
+(0, x) -> x
+(x, 0) -> x
+(O(x), O(y)) -> O(+(x, y))
+(O(x), I(y)) -> I(+(x, y))
+(I(x), O(y)) -> I(+(x, y))
+(I(x), I(y)) -> O(+(+(x, y), I(0)))
*(0, x) -> 0
*(x, 0) -> 0
*(O(x), y) -> O(*(x, y))
*(I(x), y) -> +(O(*(x, y)), y)

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

+'(O(x), O(y)) -> O'(+(x, y))
+'(O(x), O(y)) -> +'(x, y)
+'(O(x), I(y)) -> +'(x, y)
+'(I(x), O(y)) -> +'(x, y)
+'(I(x), I(y)) -> O'(+(+(x, y), I(0)))
+'(I(x), I(y)) -> +'(+(x, y), I(0))
+'(I(x), I(y)) -> +'(x, y)
*'(O(x), y) -> O'(*(x, y))
*'(O(x), y) -> *'(x, y)
*'(I(x), y) -> +'(O(*(x, y)), y)
*'(I(x), y) -> O'(*(x, y))
*'(I(x), y) -> *'(x, y)

Furthermore, R contains two SCCs.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

+'(I(x), I(y)) -> +'(x, y)
+'(I(x), I(y)) -> +'(+(x, y), I(0))
+'(I(x), O(y)) -> +'(x, y)
+'(O(x), I(y)) -> +'(x, y)
+'(O(x), O(y)) -> +'(x, y)

Rules:

O(0) -> 0
+(0, x) -> x
+(x, 0) -> x
+(O(x), O(y)) -> O(+(x, y))
+(O(x), I(y)) -> I(+(x, y))
+(I(x), O(y)) -> I(+(x, y))
+(I(x), I(y)) -> O(+(+(x, y), I(0)))
*(0, x) -> 0
*(x, 0) -> 0
*(O(x), y) -> O(*(x, y))
*(I(x), y) -> +(O(*(x, y)), y)

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

+'(I(x), I(y)) -> +'(x, y)
+'(I(x), O(y)) -> +'(x, y)
+'(O(x), I(y)) -> +'(x, y)
+'(O(x), O(y)) -> +'(x, y)

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the AFS that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order with Non-Strict Precedence with Quasi Precedence:

I > 0
O > 0
+ > 0
+' > 0

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

+'(x₁, x₂) -> x₂
O(x₁) -> O(x₁)
I(x₁) -> I(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)

The following remains to be proven:

Dependency Pair:
+'(I(x), I(y)) -> +'(+(x, y), I(0))

Rules:

O(0) -> 0
+(0, x) -> x
+(x, 0) -> x
+(O(x), O(y)) -> O(+(x, y))
+(O(x), I(y)) -> I(+(x, y))
+(I(x), O(y)) -> I(+(x, y))
+(I(x), I(y)) -> O(+(+(x, y), I(0)))
*(0, x) -> 0
*(x, 0) -> 0
*(O(x), y) -> O(*(x, y))
*(I(x), y) -> +(O(*(x, y)), y)

Strategy:
innermost
Dependency Pairs:
*'(I(x), y) -> *'(x, y)
*'(O(x), y) -> *'(x, y)

Rules:

O(0) -> 0
+(0, x) -> x
+(x, 0) -> x
+(O(x), O(y)) -> O(+(x, y))
+(O(x), I(y)) -> I(+(x, y))
+(I(x), O(y)) -> I(+(x, y))
+(I(x), I(y)) -> O(+(+(x, y), I(0)))
*(0, x) -> 0
*(x, 0) -> 0
*(O(x), y) -> O(*(x, y))
*(I(x), y) -> +(O(*(x, y)), y)

Strategy:
innermost

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)

The following remains to be proven:

Dependency Pair:
+'(I(x), I(y)) -> +'(+(x, y), I(0))

Rules:

O(0) -> 0
+(0, x) -> x
+(x, 0) -> x
+(O(x), O(y)) -> O(+(x, y))
+(O(x), I(y)) -> I(+(x, y))
+(I(x), O(y)) -> I(+(x, y))
+(I(x), I(y)) -> O(+(+(x, y), I(0)))
*(0, x) -> 0
*(x, 0) -> 0
*(O(x), y) -> O(*(x, y))
*(I(x), y) -> +(O(*(x, y)), y)

Strategy:
innermost
Dependency Pairs:
*'(I(x), y) -> *'(x, y)
*'(O(x), y) -> *'(x, y)

Rules:

O(0) -> 0
+(0, x) -> x
+(x, 0) -> x
+(O(x), O(y)) -> O(+(x, y))
+(O(x), I(y)) -> I(+(x, y))
+(I(x), O(y)) -> I(+(x, y))
+(I(x), I(y)) -> O(+(+(x, y), I(0)))
*(0, x) -> 0
*(x, 0) -> 0
*(O(x), y) -> O(*(x, y))
*(I(x), y) -> +(O(*(x, y)), y)

Strategy:
innermost

Innermost Termination of R could not be shown.
Duration:
0:01 minutes