Termination Proof using AProVE

Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y]
ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

GE(s(x), s(y)) -> GE(x, y)
MINUS(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)
DIV(x, y) -> IFY(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
DIV(x, y) -> GE(y, s(0))
IFY(true, x, y) -> IF(ge(x, y), x, y)
IFY(true, x, y) -> GE(x, y)
IF(true, x, y) -> DIV(minus(x, y), y)
IF(true, x, y) -> MINUS(x, y)

Furthermore, R contains three SCCs.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

GE(s(x), s(y)) -> GE(x, y)

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

GE(s(x), s(y)) -> GE(x, y)

one new Dependency Pair is created:

GE(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> GE(s(x''), s(y''))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 4

             ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

GE(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> GE(s(x''), s(y''))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

GE(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> GE(s(x''), s(y''))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

GE(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> GE(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 4

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 5

                 ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

GE(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> GE(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

GE(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> GE(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

GE(x₁, x₂) -> GE(x₁, x₂)
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 4

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 6

                 ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

MINUS(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

MINUS(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)

one new Dependency Pair is created:

MINUS(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> MINUS(s(x''), s(y''))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

MINUS(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> MINUS(s(x''), s(y''))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

MINUS(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> MINUS(s(x''), s(y''))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

MINUS(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> MINUS(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 8

                 ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

MINUS(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> MINUS(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

MINUS(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> MINUS(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

MINUS(x₁, x₂) -> MINUS(x₁, x₂)
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 9

                 ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Narrowing Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IF(true, x, y) -> DIV(minus(x, y), y)
IFY(true, x, y) -> IF(ge(x, y), x, y)
DIV(x, y) -> IFY(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

DIV(x, y) -> IFY(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)

two new Dependency Pairs are created:

DIV(x, 0) -> IFY(false, x, 0)
DIV(x, s(x'')) -> IFY(ge(x'', 0), x, s(x''))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rewriting Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IFY(true, x, y) -> IF(ge(x, y), x, y)
DIV(x, s(x'')) -> IFY(ge(x'', 0), x, s(x''))
IF(true, x, y) -> DIV(minus(x, y), y)

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Rewriting SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

DIV(x, s(x'')) -> IFY(ge(x'', 0), x, s(x''))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

DIV(x, s(x'')) -> IFY(true, x, s(x''))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 11

                 ↳Narrowing Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

DIV(x, s(x'')) -> IFY(true, x, s(x''))
IF(true, x, y) -> DIV(minus(x, y), y)
IFY(true, x, y) -> IF(ge(x, y), x, y)

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IFY(true, x, y) -> IF(ge(x, y), x, y)

three new Dependency Pairs are created:

IFY(true, x'', 0) -> IF(true, x'', 0)
IFY(true, 0, s(x'')) -> IF(false, 0, s(x''))
IFY(true, s(x''), s(y'')) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(x''), s(y''))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 12

                 ↳Narrowing Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IF(true, x, y) -> DIV(minus(x, y), y)
IFY(true, s(x''), s(y'')) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(x''), s(y''))
DIV(x, s(x'')) -> IFY(true, x, s(x''))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IFY(true, s(x''), s(y'')) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(x''), s(y''))

three new Dependency Pairs are created:

IFY(true, s(x'''), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(x'''), s(0))
IFY(true, s(0), s(s(x'))) -> IF(false, s(0), s(s(x')))
IFY(true, s(s(x')), s(s(y'))) -> IF(ge(x', y'), s(s(x')), s(s(y')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 13

                 ↳Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IFY(true, s(s(x')), s(s(y'))) -> IF(ge(x', y'), s(s(x')), s(s(y')))
IFY(true, s(x'''), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(x'''), s(0))
DIV(x, s(x'')) -> IFY(true, x, s(x''))
IF(true, x, y) -> DIV(minus(x, y), y)

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, an Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IF(true, x, y) -> DIV(minus(x, y), y)

two new Dependency Pairs are created:

IF(true, s(x'''''), s(0)) -> DIV(minus(s(x'''''), s(0)), s(0))
IF(true, s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))), s(s(y''')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 14

                 ↳Rewriting Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IF(true, s(x'''''), s(0)) -> DIV(minus(s(x'''''), s(0)), s(0))
IFY(true, s(x'''), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(x'''), s(0))
DIV(x, s(x'')) -> IFY(true, x, s(x''))
IF(true, s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))), s(s(y''')))
IFY(true, s(s(x')), s(s(y'))) -> IF(ge(x', y'), s(s(x')), s(s(y')))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Rewriting SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IF(true, s(x'''''), s(0)) -> DIV(minus(s(x'''''), s(0)), s(0))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

IF(true, s(x'''''), s(0)) -> DIV(minus(x''''', 0), s(0))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 15

                 ↳Rewriting Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IF(true, s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))), s(s(y''')))
IFY(true, s(s(x')), s(s(y'))) -> IF(ge(x', y'), s(s(x')), s(s(y')))
DIV(x, s(x'')) -> IFY(true, x, s(x''))
IF(true, s(x'''''), s(0)) -> DIV(minus(x''''', 0), s(0))
IFY(true, s(x'''), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(x'''), s(0))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Rewriting SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IF(true, s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))), s(s(y''')))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

IF(true, s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))) -> DIV(minus(s(x'0'), s(y''')), s(s(y''')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 16

                 ↳Rewriting Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IF(true, s(x'''''), s(0)) -> DIV(minus(x''''', 0), s(0))
IFY(true, s(x'''), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(x'''), s(0))
DIV(x, s(x'')) -> IFY(true, x, s(x''))
IF(true, s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))) -> DIV(minus(s(x'0'), s(y''')), s(s(y''')))
IFY(true, s(s(x')), s(s(y'))) -> IF(ge(x', y'), s(s(x')), s(s(y')))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Rewriting SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IF(true, s(x'''''), s(0)) -> DIV(minus(x''''', 0), s(0))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

IF(true, s(x'''''), s(0)) -> DIV(x''''', s(0))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 17

                 ↳Rewriting Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IF(true, s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))) -> DIV(minus(s(x'0'), s(y''')), s(s(y''')))
IFY(true, s(s(x')), s(s(y'))) -> IF(ge(x', y'), s(s(x')), s(s(y')))
DIV(x, s(x'')) -> IFY(true, x, s(x''))
IF(true, s(x'''''), s(0)) -> DIV(x''''', s(0))
IFY(true, s(x'''), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(x'''), s(0))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Rewriting SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IF(true, s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))) -> DIV(minus(s(x'0'), s(y''')), s(s(y''')))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

IF(true, s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))) -> DIV(minus(x'0', y'''), s(s(y''')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 18

                 ↳Narrowing Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IF(true, s(x'''''), s(0)) -> DIV(x''''', s(0))
IFY(true, s(x'''), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(x'''), s(0))
DIV(x, s(x'')) -> IFY(true, x, s(x''))
IF(true, s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))) -> DIV(minus(x'0', y'''), s(s(y''')))
IFY(true, s(s(x')), s(s(y'))) -> IF(ge(x', y'), s(s(x')), s(s(y')))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IFY(true, s(s(x')), s(s(y'))) -> IF(ge(x', y'), s(s(x')), s(s(y')))

three new Dependency Pairs are created:

IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))
IFY(true, s(s(0)), s(s(s(x'')))) -> IF(false, s(s(0)), s(s(s(x''))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(x''))), s(s(s(y'')))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(x''))), s(s(s(y''))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 19

                 ↳Narrowing Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IFY(true, s(s(s(x''))), s(s(s(y'')))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(x''))), s(s(s(y''))))
IF(true, s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))) -> DIV(minus(x'0', y'''), s(s(y''')))
IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))
IFY(true, s(x'''), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(x'''), s(0))
DIV(x, s(x'')) -> IFY(true, x, s(x''))
IF(true, s(x'''''), s(0)) -> DIV(x''''', s(0))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IFY(true, s(s(s(x''))), s(s(s(y'')))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(x''))), s(s(s(y''))))

three new Dependency Pairs are created:

IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(0))), s(s(s(s(x'))))) -> IF(false, s(s(s(0))), s(s(s(s(x')))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x')))), s(s(s(s(y'))))) -> IF(ge(x', y'), s(s(s(s(x')))), s(s(s(s(y')))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 20

                 ↳Narrowing Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x')))), s(s(s(s(y'))))) -> IF(ge(x', y'), s(s(s(s(x')))), s(s(s(s(y')))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0))))
IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))
IF(true, s(x'''''), s(0)) -> DIV(x''''', s(0))
IFY(true, s(x'''), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(x'''), s(0))
DIV(x, s(x'')) -> IFY(true, x, s(x''))
IF(true, s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))) -> DIV(minus(x'0', y'''), s(s(y''')))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x')))), s(s(s(s(y'))))) -> IF(ge(x', y'), s(s(s(s(x')))), s(s(s(s(y')))))

three new Dependency Pairs are created:

IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(0)))), s(s(s(s(s(x'')))))) -> IF(false, s(s(s(s(0)))), s(s(s(s(s(x''))))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y'')))))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''))))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 21

                 ↳Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IFY(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y'')))))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''))))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))
IF(true, s(x'''''), s(0)) -> DIV(x''''', s(0))
IFY(true, s(x'''), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(x'''), s(0))
DIV(x, s(x'')) -> IFY(true, x, s(x''))
IF(true, s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))) -> DIV(minus(x'0', y'''), s(s(y''')))
IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, an Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

DIV(x, s(x'')) -> IFY(true, x, s(x''))

two new Dependency Pairs are created:

DIV(x', s(0)) -> IFY(true, x', s(0))
DIV(x', s(s(y'''''))) -> IFY(true, x', s(s(y''''')))

The transformation is resulting in two new DP problems:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 22

                 ↳Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0))))
IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))
DIV(x', s(s(y'''''))) -> IFY(true, x', s(s(y''''')))
IF(true, s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))) -> DIV(minus(x'0', y'''), s(s(y''')))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y'')))))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''))))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, an Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IF(true, s(s(x'0')), s(s(y'''))) -> DIV(minus(x'0', y'''), s(s(y''')))

four new Dependency Pairs are created:

IF(true, s(s(x'0'')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(minus(x'0'', 0), s(s(0)))
IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(minus(s(x'''''), s(0)), s(s(s(0))))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(x'''')), s(s(0))), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y''''')))), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 24

                 ↳Rewriting Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y''''')))), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y'')))))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''))))))
IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(minus(s(x'''''), s(0)), s(s(s(0))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0))))
IF(true, s(s(x'0'')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(minus(x'0'', 0), s(s(0)))
IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))
DIV(x', s(s(y'''''))) -> IFY(true, x', s(s(y''''')))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(x'''')), s(s(0))), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Rewriting SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IF(true, s(s(x'0'')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(minus(x'0'', 0), s(s(0)))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

IF(true, s(s(x'0'')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(x'0'', s(s(0)))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 26

                 ↳Rewriting Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IFY(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y'')))))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''))))))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(x'''')), s(s(0))), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(minus(s(x'''''), s(0)), s(s(s(0))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0))))
IF(true, s(s(x'0'')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(x'0'', s(s(0)))
IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))
DIV(x', s(s(y'''''))) -> IFY(true, x', s(s(y''''')))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y''''')))), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Rewriting SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(minus(s(x'''''), s(0)), s(s(s(0))))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(minus(x''''', 0), s(s(s(0))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 28

                 ↳Rewriting Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(x'''')), s(s(0))), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(minus(x''''', 0), s(s(s(0))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0))))
IF(true, s(s(x'0'')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(x'0'', s(s(0)))
IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))
DIV(x', s(s(y'''''))) -> IFY(true, x', s(s(y''''')))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y''''')))), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y'')))))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''))))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Rewriting SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(x'''')), s(s(0))), s(s(s(s(0)))))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(minus(s(x''''), s(0)), s(s(s(s(0)))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 30

                 ↳Rewriting Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y''''')))), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y'')))))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''))))))
IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(minus(x''''', 0), s(s(s(0))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0))))
IF(true, s(s(x'0'')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(x'0'', s(s(0)))
IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))
DIV(x', s(s(y'''''))) -> IFY(true, x', s(s(y''''')))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(minus(s(x''''), s(0)), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Rewriting SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y''''')))), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''''))), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 32

                 ↳Rewriting Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(minus(s(x''''), s(0)), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(minus(x''''', 0), s(s(s(0))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0))))
IF(true, s(s(x'0'')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(x'0'', s(s(0)))
IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))
DIV(x', s(s(y'''''))) -> IFY(true, x', s(s(y''''')))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''''))), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y'')))))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''))))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Rewriting SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(minus(x''''', 0), s(s(s(0))))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(x''''', s(s(s(0))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 34

                 ↳Rewriting Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''''))), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y'')))))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''))))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(x''''', s(s(s(0))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0))))
IF(true, s(s(x'0'')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(x'0'', s(s(0)))
IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))
DIV(x', s(s(y'''''))) -> IFY(true, x', s(s(y''''')))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(minus(s(x''''), s(0)), s(s(s(s(0)))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Rewriting SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(minus(s(x''''), s(0)), s(s(s(s(0)))))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(minus(x'''', 0), s(s(s(s(0)))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 36

                 ↳Rewriting Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IFY(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y'')))))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''))))))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(minus(x'''', 0), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(x''''', s(s(s(0))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0))))
IF(true, s(s(x'0'')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(x'0'', s(s(0)))
IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))
DIV(x', s(s(y'''''))) -> IFY(true, x', s(s(y''''')))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''''))), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Rewriting SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''''))), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(s(x''''), s(y''''')), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 37

                 ↳Rewriting Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(minus(x'''', 0), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(x''''', s(s(s(0))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0))))
IF(true, s(s(x'0'')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(x'0'', s(s(0)))
IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))
DIV(x', s(s(y'''''))) -> IFY(true, x', s(s(y''''')))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(s(x''''), s(y''''')), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y'')))))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''))))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Rewriting SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(minus(x'''', 0), s(s(s(s(0)))))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(x'''', s(s(s(s(0)))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 38

                 ↳Rewriting Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(s(x''''), s(y''''')), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y'')))))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''))))))
IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(x''''', s(s(s(0))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0))))
IF(true, s(s(x'0'')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(x'0'', s(s(0)))
IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))
DIV(x', s(s(y'''''))) -> IFY(true, x', s(s(y''''')))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(x'''', s(s(s(s(0)))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Rewriting SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(s(x''''), s(y''''')), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(x'''', y'''''), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 39

                 ↳Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(x'''', s(s(s(s(0)))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(x''''', s(s(s(0))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0))))
IF(true, s(s(x'0'')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(x'0'', s(s(0)))
IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))
DIV(x', s(s(y'''''))) -> IFY(true, x', s(s(y''''')))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(x'''', y'''''), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y'')))))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''))))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, an Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

DIV(x', s(s(y'''''))) -> IFY(true, x', s(s(y''''')))

four new Dependency Pairs are created:

DIV(x'', s(s(0))) -> IFY(true, x'', s(s(0)))
DIV(x'', s(s(s(0)))) -> IFY(true, x'', s(s(s(0))))
DIV(x'', s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IFY(true, x'', s(s(s(s(0)))))
DIV(x''', s(s(s(s(s(y''''''')))))) -> IFY(true, x''', s(s(s(s(s(y'''''''))))))

The transformation is resulting in four new DP problems:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 40

                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))
DIV(x'', s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IFY(true, x'', s(s(s(s(0)))))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(x'''', s(s(s(s(0)))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

DIV(x'', s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IFY(true, x'', s(s(s(s(0)))))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

DIV(s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 44

                 ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

Dependency Pairs:

DIV(s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(x'''', s(s(s(s(0)))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> DIV(x'''', s(s(s(s(0)))))

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

DIV(x₁, x₂) -> x₁
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)
IFY(x₁, x₂, x₃) -> x₂
IF(x₁, x₂, x₃) -> x₂

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 49

                 ↳Dependency Graph

Dependency Pairs:

DIV(s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'''')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0))))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(s(x'')))), s(s(s(s(0)))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 41

                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0))))
DIV(x'', s(s(s(0)))) -> IFY(true, x'', s(s(s(0))))
IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(x''''', s(s(s(0))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

DIV(x'', s(s(s(0)))) -> IFY(true, x'', s(s(s(0))))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

DIV(s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 45

                 ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

Dependency Pairs:

DIV(s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0))))
IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(x''''', s(s(s(0))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> DIV(x''''', s(s(s(0))))

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

IFY(x₁, x₂, x₃) -> x₂
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)
IF(x₁, x₂, x₃) -> x₂
DIV(x₁, x₂) -> x₁

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 50

                 ↳Dependency Graph

Dependency Pairs:

DIV(s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''''))), s(s(s(0))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0)))) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''))), s(s(s(0))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 42

                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))
DIV(x'', s(s(0))) -> IFY(true, x'', s(s(0)))
IF(true, s(s(x'0'')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(x'0'', s(s(0)))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

DIV(x'', s(s(0))) -> IFY(true, x'', s(s(0)))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

DIV(s(s(x'''')), s(s(0))) -> IFY(true, s(s(x'''')), s(s(0)))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 46

                 ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

Dependency Pairs:

DIV(s(s(x'''')), s(s(0))) -> IFY(true, s(s(x'''')), s(s(0)))
IF(true, s(s(x'0'')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(x'0'', s(s(0)))
IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

IF(true, s(s(x'0'')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(x'0'', s(s(0)))

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

IFY(x₁, x₂, x₃) -> x₂
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)
IF(x₁, x₂, x₃) -> x₂
DIV(x₁, x₂) -> x₁

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 51

                 ↳Dependency Graph

Dependency Pairs:

DIV(s(s(x'''')), s(s(0))) -> IFY(true, s(s(x'''')), s(s(0)))
IFY(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0))) -> IF(true, s(s(x'')), s(s(0)))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 43

                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IFY(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y'')))))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''))))))
DIV(x''', s(s(s(s(s(y''''''')))))) -> IFY(true, x''', s(s(s(s(s(y'''''''))))))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(x'''', y'''''), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

DIV(x''', s(s(s(s(s(y''''''')))))) -> IFY(true, x''', s(s(s(s(s(y'''''''))))))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

DIV(s(s(s(s(s(x'''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''''')))))) -> IFY(true, s(s(s(s(s(x'''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''''''))))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 47

                 ↳Remaining Obligation(s)

The following remains to be proven:
Dependency Pairs:

DIV(s(s(s(s(s(x'''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''''')))))) -> IFY(true, s(s(s(s(s(x'''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''''''))))))
IF(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''''')))))) -> DIV(minus(x'''', y'''''), s(s(s(s(s(y'''''))))))
IFY(true, s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y'')))))) -> IF(ge(x'', y''), s(s(s(s(s(x''))))), s(s(s(s(s(y''))))))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 23

                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IFY(true, s(x'''), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(x'''), s(0))
DIV(x', s(0)) -> IFY(true, x', s(0))
IF(true, s(x'''''), s(0)) -> DIV(x''''', s(0))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

DIV(x', s(0)) -> IFY(true, x', s(0))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

DIV(s(x'''''), s(0)) -> IFY(true, s(x'''''), s(0))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 25

                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

DIV(s(x'''''), s(0)) -> IFY(true, s(x'''''), s(0))
IF(true, s(x'''''), s(0)) -> DIV(x''''', s(0))
IFY(true, s(x'''), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(x'''), s(0))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IF(true, s(x'''''), s(0)) -> DIV(x''''', s(0))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

IF(true, s(s(x''''''')), s(0)) -> DIV(s(x'''''''), s(0))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 27

                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IF(true, s(s(x''''''')), s(0)) -> DIV(s(x'''''''), s(0))
IFY(true, s(x'''), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(x'''), s(0))
DIV(s(x'''''), s(0)) -> IFY(true, s(x'''''), s(0))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IFY(true, s(x'''), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(x'''), s(0))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

IFY(true, s(s(x''''''''')), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(s(x''''''''')), s(0))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 29

                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IFY(true, s(s(x''''''''')), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(s(x''''''''')), s(0))
DIV(s(x'''''), s(0)) -> IFY(true, s(x'''''), s(0))
IF(true, s(s(x''''''')), s(0)) -> DIV(s(x'''''''), s(0))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

DIV(s(x'''''), s(0)) -> IFY(true, s(x'''''), s(0))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

DIV(s(s(x''''''''''')), s(0)) -> IFY(true, s(s(x''''''''''')), s(0))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 31

                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

DIV(s(s(x''''''''''')), s(0)) -> IFY(true, s(s(x''''''''''')), s(0))
IF(true, s(s(x''''''')), s(0)) -> DIV(s(x'''''''), s(0))
IFY(true, s(s(x''''''''')), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(s(x''''''''')), s(0))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IF(true, s(s(x''''''')), s(0)) -> DIV(s(x'''''''), s(0))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''''''''''))), s(0)) -> DIV(s(s(x''''''''''''')), s(0))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 33

                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''''''''''))), s(0)) -> DIV(s(s(x''''''''''''')), s(0))
IFY(true, s(s(x''''''''')), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(s(x''''''''')), s(0))
DIV(s(s(x''''''''''')), s(0)) -> IFY(true, s(s(x''''''''''')), s(0))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IFY(true, s(s(x''''''''')), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(s(x''''''''')), s(0))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''''''''''''''))), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''''''''''''))), s(0))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 35

                 ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

Dependency Pairs:

IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''''''''''''''))), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''''''''''''))), s(0))
DIV(s(s(x''''''''''')), s(0)) -> IFY(true, s(s(x''''''''''')), s(0))
IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''''''''''))), s(0)) -> DIV(s(s(x''''''''''''')), s(0))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''''''''''))), s(0)) -> DIV(s(s(x''''''''''''')), s(0))

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

IFY(x₁, x₂, x₃) -> x₂
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)
IF(x₁, x₂, x₃) -> x₂
DIV(x₁, x₂) -> x₁

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Rw

...

               →DP Problem 48

                 ↳Dependency Graph

Dependency Pairs:

IFY(true, s(s(s(x'''''''''''''''))), s(0)) -> IF(true, s(s(s(x'''''''''''''''))), s(0))
DIV(s(s(x''''''''''')), s(0)) -> IFY(true, s(s(x''''''''''')), s(0))

Rules:

ge(x, 0) -> true
ge(0, s(x)) -> false
ge(s(x), s(y)) -> ge(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
div(x, y) -> ify(ge(y, s(0)), x, y)
ify(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify(true, x, y) -> if(ge(x, y), x, y)
if(false, x, y) -> 0
if(true, x, y) -> s(div(minus(x, y), y))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R could not be shown.
Duration:
0:04 minutes