Term Rewriting System R:
[x]
half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
bits(0) -> 0
bits(s(x)) -> s(bits(half(s(x))))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

HALF(s(s(x))) -> HALF(x)
BITS(s(x)) -> BITS(half(s(x)))
BITS(s(x)) -> HALF(s(x))

Furthermore, R contains two SCCs. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polynomial Ordering
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:

HALF(s(s(x))) -> HALF(x)


Rules:


half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
bits(0) -> 0
bits(s(x)) -> s(bits(half(s(x))))


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

HALF(s(s(x))) -> HALF(x)


There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(HALF(x1))=  1 + x1  
  POL(s(x1))=  1 + x1  

resulting in one new DP problem. 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
           →DP Problem 3
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
bits(0) -> 0
bits(s(x)) -> s(bits(half(s(x))))


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)




The following remains to be proven:
Dependency Pair:

BITS(s(x)) -> BITS(half(s(x)))


Rules:


half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
bits(0) -> 0
bits(s(x)) -> s(bits(half(s(x))))


Strategy:

innermost



Innermost Termination of R could not be shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes