Term Rewriting System R:
[y, x, xs, f]
app(app(plus, 0), y) -> y
app(app(plus, app(s, x)), y) -> app(s, app(app(plus, x), y))
app(inc, xs) -> app(app(map, app(plus, app(s, 0))), xs)
app(app(map, f), nil) -> nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

APP(app(plus, app(s, x)), y) -> APP(s, app(app(plus, x), y))
APP(app(plus, app(s, x)), y) -> APP(app(plus, x), y)
APP(app(plus, app(s, x)), y) -> APP(plus, x)
APP(inc, xs) -> APP(app(map, app(plus, app(s, 0))), xs)
APP(inc, xs) -> APP(map, app(plus, app(s, 0)))
APP(inc, xs) -> APP(plus, app(s, 0))
APP(inc, xs) -> APP(s, 0)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(cons, app(f, x))
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(f, x)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(app(map, f), xs)

Furthermore, R contains one SCC. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)




The following remains to be proven:
Dependency Pairs:

APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(app(map, f), xs)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(f, x)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
APP(inc, xs) -> APP(app(map, app(plus, app(s, 0))), xs)
APP(app(plus, app(s, x)), y) -> APP(app(plus, x), y)


Rules:


app(app(plus, 0), y) -> y
app(app(plus, app(s, x)), y) -> app(s, app(app(plus, x), y))
app(inc, xs) -> app(app(map, app(plus, app(s, 0))), xs)
app(app(map, f), nil) -> nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))


Strategy:

innermost



Innermost Termination of R could not be shown.
Duration:
0:02 minutes