Term Rewriting System R:
[f, x, xs, g]
app(app(map, f), nil) -> nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(app(comp, f), g), x) -> app(f, app(g, x))
app(twice, f) -> app(app(comp, f), f)
Innermost Termination of R to be shown.
R
↳Dependency Pair Analysis
R contains the following Dependency Pairs:
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(cons, app(f, x))
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(f, x)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(app(map, f), xs)
APP(app(app(comp, f), g), x) -> APP(f, app(g, x))
APP(app(app(comp, f), g), x) -> APP(g, x)
APP(twice, f) -> APP(app(comp, f), f)
APP(twice, f) -> APP(comp, f)
Furthermore, R contains one SCC.
R
↳DPs
→DP Problem 1
↳Size-Change Principle
Dependency Pairs:
APP(app(app(comp, f), g), x) -> APP(g, x)
APP(app(app(comp, f), g), x) -> APP(f, app(g, x))
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(app(map, f), xs)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(f, x)
Rules:
app(app(map, f), nil) -> nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
app(app(app(comp, f), g), x) -> app(f, app(g, x))
app(twice, f) -> app(app(comp, f), f)
Strategy:
innermost
We number the DPs as follows:
- APP(app(app(comp, f), g), x) -> APP(g, x)
- APP(app(app(comp, f), g), x) -> APP(f, app(g, x))
- APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(app(map, f), xs)
- APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(f, x)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none
We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial
with Argument Filtering System:
trivial
We obtain no new DP problems.
Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes