Term Rewriting System R:
[x]
app(g, app(h, app(g, x))) -> app(g, x)
app(g, app(g, x)) -> app(g, app(h, app(g, x)))
app(h, app(h, x)) -> app(h, app(app(f, app(h, x)), x))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

`   R`
`     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis`

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

APP(g, app(g, x)) -> APP(g, app(h, app(g, x)))
APP(g, app(g, x)) -> APP(h, app(g, x))
APP(h, app(h, x)) -> APP(h, app(app(f, app(h, x)), x))
APP(h, app(h, x)) -> APP(app(f, app(h, x)), x)
APP(h, app(h, x)) -> APP(f, app(h, x))

Furthermore, R contains two SCCs.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pair:

APP(h, app(h, x)) -> APP(h, app(app(f, app(h, x)), x))

Rules:

app(g, app(h, app(g, x))) -> app(g, x)
app(g, app(g, x)) -> app(g, app(h, app(g, x)))
app(h, app(h, x)) -> app(h, app(app(f, app(h, x)), x))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

APP(h, app(h, x)) -> APP(h, app(app(f, app(h, x)), x))

Additionally, the following usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS can be oriented:

app(g, app(h, app(g, x))) -> app(g, x)
app(g, app(g, x)) -> app(g, app(h, app(g, x)))
app(h, app(h, x)) -> app(h, app(app(f, app(h, x)), x))

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(g) =  0 POL(h) =  1 POL(app(x1, x2)) =  x1 POL(f) =  0 POL(APP(x1, x2)) =  1 + x2

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 3`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

app(g, app(h, app(g, x))) -> app(g, x)
app(g, app(g, x)) -> app(g, app(h, app(g, x)))
app(h, app(h, x)) -> app(h, app(app(f, app(h, x)), x))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`

Dependency Pair:

APP(g, app(g, x)) -> APP(g, app(h, app(g, x)))

Rules:

app(g, app(h, app(g, x))) -> app(g, x)
app(g, app(g, x)) -> app(g, app(h, app(g, x)))
app(h, app(h, x)) -> app(h, app(app(f, app(h, x)), x))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

APP(g, app(g, x)) -> APP(g, app(h, app(g, x)))

Additionally, the following usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS can be oriented:

app(g, app(h, app(g, x))) -> app(g, x)
app(g, app(g, x)) -> app(g, app(h, app(g, x)))
app(h, app(h, x)) -> app(h, app(app(f, app(h, x)), x))

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(g) =  1 POL(h) =  0 POL(app(x1, x2)) =  x1 POL(f) =  0 POL(APP(x1, x2)) =  1 + x2

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 4`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

app(g, app(h, app(g, x))) -> app(g, x)
app(g, app(g, x)) -> app(g, app(h, app(g, x)))
app(h, app(h, x)) -> app(h, app(app(f, app(h, x)), x))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes