Termination Proof using AProVE

Term Rewriting System R:
[z, x, y]
app(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> app(app(h, app(c, z)), app(app(d, z), x))
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, 0), 0)) -> app(e, 0)
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(app(d, z), y))
app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> app(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))), app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)))
app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> app(e, app(app(g, x), y))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

APP(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> APP(app(h, app(c, z)), app(app(d, z), x))
APP(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> APP(h, app(c, z))
APP(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> APP(c, z)
APP(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> APP(app(d, z), x)
APP(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> APP(d, z)
APP(app(d, z), app(app(g, 0), 0)) -> APP(e, 0)
APP(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> APP(app(g, app(e, x)), app(app(d, z), y))
APP(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> APP(g, app(e, x))
APP(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> APP(e, x)
APP(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> APP(app(d, z), y)
APP(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> APP(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))), app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)))
APP(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> APP(g, app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y)))
APP(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> APP(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))
APP(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> APP(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y))
APP(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> APP(d, z)
APP(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> APP(e, app(app(g, x), y))
APP(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> APP(app(g, x), y)
APP(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> APP(g, x)

Furthermore, R contains one SCC.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Polynomial Ordering

Dependency Pairs:

APP(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> APP(app(g, x), y)
APP(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> APP(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y))
APP(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> APP(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))
APP(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> APP(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))), app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)))
APP(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> APP(app(d, z), y)
APP(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> APP(app(g, app(e, x)), app(app(d, z), y))
APP(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> APP(app(d, z), x)
APP(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> APP(app(h, app(c, z)), app(app(d, z), x))

Rules:

app(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> app(app(h, app(c, z)), app(app(d, z), x))
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, 0), 0)) -> app(e, 0)
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(app(d, z), y))
app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> app(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))), app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)))
app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> app(e, app(app(g, x), y))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

APP(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> APP(app(d, z), x)

Additionally, the following usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS can be oriented:

app(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> app(app(h, app(c, z)), app(app(d, z), x))
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, 0), 0)) -> app(e, 0)
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(app(d, z), y))
app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> app(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))), app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)))
app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> app(e, app(app(g, x), y))

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:

POL(c) = 1

POL(0) = 0

POL(g) = 0

POL(e) = 0

POL(d) = 0

POL(h) = 1

POL(app(x₁, x₂)) = x₁

POL(APP(x₁, x₂)) = x₁

resulting in one new DP problem.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Polo

           →DP Problem 2

             ↳Polynomial Ordering

Dependency Pairs:

Rules:

app(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> app(app(h, app(c, z)), app(app(d, z), x))
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, 0), 0)) -> app(e, 0)
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(app(d, z), y))
app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> app(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))), app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)))
app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> app(e, app(app(g, x), y))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

APP(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> APP(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))), app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)))
APP(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> APP(app(g, app(e, x)), app(app(d, z), y))

Additionally, the following usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS can be oriented:

app(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> app(app(h, app(c, z)), app(app(d, z), x))
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, 0), 0)) -> app(e, 0)
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(app(d, z), y))
app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> app(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))), app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)))
app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> app(e, app(app(g, x), y))

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:

POL(c) = 1

POL(0) = 0

POL(g) = 0

POL(e) = 0

POL(d) = 1

POL(h) = 1

POL(app(x₁, x₂)) = x₁

POL(APP(x₁, x₂)) = x₁

resulting in one new DP problem.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Polo

           →DP Problem 2

             ↳Polo

...

               →DP Problem 3

                 ↳Dependency Graph

Dependency Pairs:

Rules:

app(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> app(app(h, app(c, z)), app(app(d, z), x))
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, 0), 0)) -> app(e, 0)
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(app(d, z), y))
app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> app(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))), app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)))
app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> app(e, app(app(g, x), y))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph the DP problem was split into 2 DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Polo

           →DP Problem 2

             ↳Polo

...

               →DP Problem 7

                 ↳Remaining Obligation(s)

The following remains to be proven:

Dependency Pairs:
APP(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> APP(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y))
APP(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> APP(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))
APP(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> APP(app(d, z), y)

Rules:

app(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> app(app(h, app(c, z)), app(app(d, z), x))
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, 0), 0)) -> app(e, 0)
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(app(d, z), y))
app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> app(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))), app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)))
app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> app(e, app(app(g, x), y))

Strategy:
innermost
Dependency Pairs:
APP(app(h, z''), app(e, app(app(g, x''), y'))) -> APP(app(h, app(c, z'')), app(app(g, app(e, x'')), app(app(d, z''), y')))
APP(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> APP(app(g, x), y)
APP(app(h, app(c, z'')), app(e, app(app(g, app(app(g, x''), y')), 0))) -> APP(app(h, app(c, app(c, z''))), app(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z'')), app(app(g, x''), y'))), app(app(d, z''), app(app(g, x''), y'))))

Rules:

app(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> app(app(h, app(c, z)), app(app(d, z), x))
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, 0), 0)) -> app(e, 0)
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(app(d, z), y))
app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> app(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))), app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)))
app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> app(e, app(app(g, x), y))

Strategy:
innermost

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Polo

           →DP Problem 2

             ↳Polo

...

               →DP Problem 5

                 ↳Narrowing Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

APP(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> APP(app(h, app(c, z)), app(app(d, z), x))
APP(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> APP(app(g, x), y)

Rules:

app(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> app(app(h, app(c, z)), app(app(d, z), x))
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, 0), 0)) -> app(e, 0)
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(app(d, z), y))
app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> app(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))), app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)))
app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> app(e, app(app(g, x), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

APP(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> APP(app(h, app(c, z)), app(app(d, z), x))

three new Dependency Pairs are created:

APP(app(h, z''), app(e, app(app(g, 0), 0))) -> APP(app(h, app(c, z'')), app(e, 0))
APP(app(h, z''), app(e, app(app(g, x''), y'))) -> APP(app(h, app(c, z'')), app(app(g, app(e, x'')), app(app(d, z''), y')))
APP(app(h, app(c, z'')), app(e, app(app(g, app(app(g, x''), y')), 0))) -> APP(app(h, app(c, app(c, z''))), app(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z'')), app(app(g, x''), y'))), app(app(d, z''), app(app(g, x''), y'))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Polo

           →DP Problem 2

             ↳Polo

...

               →DP Problem 6

                 ↳Narrowing Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

APP(app(h, app(c, z'')), app(e, app(app(g, app(app(g, x''), y')), 0))) -> APP(app(h, app(c, app(c, z''))), app(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z'')), app(app(g, x''), y'))), app(app(d, z''), app(app(g, x''), y'))))
APP(app(h, z''), app(e, app(app(g, x''), y'))) -> APP(app(h, app(c, z'')), app(app(g, app(e, x'')), app(app(d, z''), y')))
APP(app(h, z''), app(e, app(app(g, 0), 0))) -> APP(app(h, app(c, z'')), app(e, 0))
APP(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> APP(app(g, x), y)

Rules:

app(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> app(app(h, app(c, z)), app(app(d, z), x))
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, 0), 0)) -> app(e, 0)
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(app(d, z), y))
app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> app(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))), app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)))
app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> app(e, app(app(g, x), y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

APP(app(h, z''), app(e, app(app(g, 0), 0))) -> APP(app(h, app(c, z'')), app(e, 0))

no new Dependency Pairs are created.
The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Polo

           →DP Problem 2

             ↳Polo

...

               →DP Problem 7

                 ↳Remaining Obligation(s)

The following remains to be proven:

Dependency Pairs:
APP(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> APP(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y))
APP(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> APP(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))
APP(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> APP(app(d, z), y)

Rules:

app(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> app(app(h, app(c, z)), app(app(d, z), x))
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, 0), 0)) -> app(e, 0)
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(app(d, z), y))
app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> app(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))), app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)))
app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> app(e, app(app(g, x), y))

Strategy:
innermost
Dependency Pairs:
APP(app(h, z''), app(e, app(app(g, x''), y'))) -> APP(app(h, app(c, z'')), app(app(g, app(e, x'')), app(app(d, z''), y')))
APP(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> APP(app(g, x), y)
APP(app(h, app(c, z'')), app(e, app(app(g, app(app(g, x''), y')), 0))) -> APP(app(h, app(c, app(c, z''))), app(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z'')), app(app(g, x''), y'))), app(app(d, z''), app(app(g, x''), y'))))

Rules:

app(app(h, z), app(e, x)) -> app(app(h, app(c, z)), app(app(d, z), x))
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, 0), 0)) -> app(e, 0)
app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)) -> app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(app(d, z), y))
app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, app(app(g, x), y)), 0)) -> app(app(g, app(app(d, app(c, z)), app(app(g, x), y))), app(app(d, z), app(app(g, x), y)))
app(app(g, app(e, x)), app(e, y)) -> app(e, app(app(g, x), y))

Strategy:
innermost

Innermost Termination of R could not be shown.
Duration:
0:03 minutes

POL(c)	= 1
POL(0)	= 0
POL(g)	= 0
POL(e)	= 0
POL(d)	= 0
POL(h)	= 1
POL(app(x₁, x₂))	= x₁
POL(APP(x₁, x₂))	= x₁