Termination Proof using AProVE

Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y, z]
app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) -> app(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> app(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) -> app(app(:, app(app(g, z), y)), app(app(+, x), a))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))
APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, y), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) -> APP(:, y)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(+, app(app(:, x), z))
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, x), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(:, x)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, y), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(:, y)
APP(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) -> APP(app(:, app(app(g, z), y)), app(app(+, x), a))
APP(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) -> APP(:, app(app(g, z), y))
APP(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) -> APP(app(g, z), y)
APP(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) -> APP(g, z)
APP(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) -> APP(app(+, x), a)

Furthermore, R contains one SCC.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Narrowing Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

APP(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) -> APP(app(g, z), y)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, y), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, x), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))
APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, y), z)
APP(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) -> APP(app(:, app(app(g, z), y)), app(app(+, x), a))
APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))

Rules:

app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) -> app(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> app(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) -> app(app(:, app(app(g, z), y)), app(app(+, x), a))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

APP(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) -> APP(app(:, app(app(g, z), y)), app(app(+, x), a))

no new Dependency Pairs are created.
The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 2

             ↳Narrowing Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, y), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, x), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))
APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, y), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))
APP(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) -> APP(app(g, z), y)

Rules:

app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) -> app(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> app(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) -> app(app(:, app(app(g, z), y)), app(app(+, x), a))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

APP(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) -> APP(app(g, z), y)

no new Dependency Pairs are created.
The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 2

             ↳Nar

...

               →DP Problem 3

                 ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

Dependency Pairs:

APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, x), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))
APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, y), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, y), z)

Rules:

app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) -> app(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> app(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) -> app(app(:, app(app(g, z), y)), app(app(+, x), a))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))

The following usable rules for innermost can be oriented:

app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) -> app(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> app(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) -> app(app(:, app(app(g, z), y)), app(app(+, x), a))

Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order with Non-Strict Precedence with Quasi Precedence:

: > +

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

APP(x₁, x₂) -> APP(x₁, x₂)
app(x₁, x₂) -> x₁

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 2

             ↳Nar

...

               →DP Problem 4

                 ↳Remaining Obligation(s)

The following remains to be proven:
Dependency Pairs:

APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, x), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, y), z)
APP(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> APP(app(:, y), z)

Rules:

app(app(:, app(app(:, x), y)), z) -> app(app(:, x), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, app(app(+, x), y)), z) -> app(app(+, app(app(:, x), z)), app(app(:, y), z))
app(app(:, z), app(app(+, x), app(f, y))) -> app(app(:, app(app(g, z), y)), app(app(+, x), a))

Strategy:

innermost

Innermost Termination of R could not be shown.
Duration:
0:04 minutes