Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y, z]
app(app(., 1), x) -> x
app(app(., x), 1) -> x
app(app(., app(i, x)), x) -> 1
app(app(., x), app(i, x)) -> 1
app(app(., app(i, y)), app(app(., y), z)) -> z
app(app(., y), app(app(., app(i, y)), z)) -> z
app(app(., app(app(., x), y)), z) -> app(app(., x), app(app(., y), z))
app(i, 1) -> 1
app(i, app(i, x)) -> x
app(i, app(app(., x), y)) -> app(app(., app(i, y)), app(i, x))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

APP(app(., app(app(., x), y)), z) -> APP(app(., x), app(app(., y), z))
APP(app(., app(app(., x), y)), z) -> APP(app(., y), z)
APP(app(., app(app(., x), y)), z) -> APP(., y)
APP(i, app(app(., x), y)) -> APP(app(., app(i, y)), app(i, x))
APP(i, app(app(., x), y)) -> APP(., app(i, y))
APP(i, app(app(., x), y)) -> APP(i, y)
APP(i, app(app(., x), y)) -> APP(i, x)

Furthermore, R contains two SCCs. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Usable Rules (Innermost)
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pair:

APP(app(., app(app(., x), y)), z) -> APP(app(., y), z)


Rules:


app(app(., 1), x) -> x
app(app(., x), 1) -> x
app(app(., app(i, x)), x) -> 1
app(app(., x), app(i, x)) -> 1
app(app(., app(i, y)), app(app(., y), z)) -> z
app(app(., y), app(app(., app(i, y)), z)) -> z
app(app(., app(app(., x), y)), z) -> app(app(., x), app(app(., y), z))
app(i, 1) -> 1
app(i, app(i, x)) -> x
app(i, app(app(., x), y)) -> app(app(., app(i, y)), app(i, x))


Strategy:

innermost




As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 10 non-usable-rules.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
           →DP Problem 3
             ↳A-Transformation
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pair:

APP(app(., app(app(., x), y)), z) -> APP(app(., y), z)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We have an applicative DP problem with proper arity. Thus we can use the A-Transformation to obtain one new DP problem which consists of the A-transformed TRSs.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
           →DP Problem 3
             ↳ATrans
             ...
               →DP Problem 4
                 ↳Size-Change Principle
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pair:

.'(.(x, y), z) -> .'(y, z)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We number the DPs as follows:
  1. .'(.(x, y), z) -> .'(y, z)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1
2=2

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1
2=2

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
.(x1, x2) -> .(x1, x2)

We obtain no new DP problems. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Usable Rules (Innermost)


Dependency Pair:

APP(i, app(app(., x), y)) -> APP(i, y)


Rules:


app(app(., 1), x) -> x
app(app(., x), 1) -> x
app(app(., app(i, x)), x) -> 1
app(app(., x), app(i, x)) -> 1
app(app(., app(i, y)), app(app(., y), z)) -> z
app(app(., y), app(app(., app(i, y)), z)) -> z
app(app(., app(app(., x), y)), z) -> app(app(., x), app(app(., y), z))
app(i, 1) -> 1
app(i, app(i, x)) -> x
app(i, app(app(., x), y)) -> app(app(., app(i, y)), app(i, x))


Strategy:

innermost




As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 10 non-usable-rules.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳UsableRules
           →DP Problem 5
             ↳A-Transformation


Dependency Pair:

APP(i, app(app(., x), y)) -> APP(i, y)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We have an applicative DP problem with proper arity. Thus we can use the A-Transformation to obtain one new DP problem which consists of the A-transformed TRSs.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳UsableRules
           →DP Problem 5
             ↳ATrans
             ...
               →DP Problem 6
                 ↳Size-Change Principle


Dependency Pair:

I(.(x, y)) -> I(y)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We number the DPs as follows:
  1. I(.(x, y)) -> I(y)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
.(x1, x2) -> .(x1, x2)

We obtain no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes