Term Rewriting System R:
[x]
app(f, app(g, x)) -> app(g, app(g, app(f, x)))
app(f, app(g, x)) -> app(g, app(g, app(g, x)))
Innermost Termination of R to be shown.
R
↳Removing Redundant Rules
Removing the following rules from R which fullfill a polynomial ordering:
app(f, app(g, x)) -> app(g, app(g, app(g, x)))
where the Polynomial interpretation:
POL(g) | = 0 |
POL(app(x1, x2)) | = x1 + x2 |
POL(f) | = 1 |
was used.
Not all Rules of R can be deleted, so we still have to regard a part of R.
R
↳RRRPolo
→TRS2
↳Dependency Pair Analysis
R contains the following Dependency Pairs:
APP(f, app(g, x)) -> APP(g, app(g, app(f, x)))
APP(f, app(g, x)) -> APP(g, app(f, x))
APP(f, app(g, x)) -> APP(f, x)
Furthermore, R contains one SCC.
R
↳RRRPolo
→TRS2
↳DPs
→DP Problem 1
↳Usable Rules (Innermost)
Dependency Pair:
APP(f, app(g, x)) -> APP(f, x)
Rule:
app(f, app(g, x)) -> app(g, app(g, app(f, x)))
Strategy:
innermost
As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 1 non-usable-rules.
R
↳RRRPolo
→TRS2
↳DPs
→DP Problem 1
↳UsableRules
...
→DP Problem 2
↳A-Transformation
Dependency Pair:
APP(f, app(g, x)) -> APP(f, x)
Rule:
none
Strategy:
innermost
We have an applicative DP problem with proper arity. Thus we can use the A-Transformation to obtain one new DP problem which consists of the A-transformed TRSs.
R
↳RRRPolo
→TRS2
↳DPs
→DP Problem 1
↳UsableRules
...
→DP Problem 3
↳Size-Change Principle
Dependency Pair:
F(g(x)) -> F(x)
Rule:
none
Strategy:
innermost
We number the DPs as follows:
- F(g(x)) -> F(x)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none
We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial
with Argument Filtering System:
g(x1) -> g(x1)
We obtain no new DP problems.
Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes