Termination Proof using AProVE

Term Rewriting System R:
[X, X1, X2, X3]
active(f(a, b, X)) -> mark(f(X, X, X))
active(c) -> mark(a)
active(c) -> mark(b)
active(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(X1, X2, active(X3))
f(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(f(X1, X2, X3))
f(X1, X2, mark(X3)) -> mark(f(X1, X2, X3))
f(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(f(X1, X2, X3))
proper(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(a) -> ok(a)
proper(b) -> ok(b)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVE(f(a, b, X)) -> F(X, X, X)
ACTIVE(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> F(active(X1), X2, X3)
ACTIVE(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> F(X1, X2, active(X3))
ACTIVE(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> ACTIVE(X3)
F(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> F(X1, X2, X3)
F(X1, X2, mark(X3)) -> F(X1, X2, X3)
F(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> F(X1, X2, X3)
PROPER(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> F(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
PROPER(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> PROPER(X3)
TOP(mark(X)) -> TOP(proper(X))
TOP(mark(X)) -> PROPER(X)
TOP(ok(X)) -> TOP(active(X))
TOP(ok(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)

Furthermore, R contains four SCCs.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

F(X1, X2, mark(X3)) -> F(X1, X2, X3)
F(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> F(X1, X2, X3)
F(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> F(X1, X2, X3)

Rules:

active(f(a, b, X)) -> mark(f(X, X, X))
active(c) -> mark(a)
active(c) -> mark(b)
active(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(X1, X2, active(X3))
f(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(f(X1, X2, X3))
f(X1, X2, mark(X3)) -> mark(f(X1, X2, X3))
f(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(f(X1, X2, X3))
proper(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(a) -> ok(a)
proper(b) -> ok(b)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

F(X1, X2, mark(X3)) -> F(X1, X2, X3)
F(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> F(X1, X2, X3)
F(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> F(X1, X2, X3)

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the AFS that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

F(x₁, x₂, x₃) -> F(x₁, x₂, x₃)
mark(x₁) -> mark(x₁)
ok(x₁) -> ok(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 5

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(f(a, b, X)) -> mark(f(X, X, X))
active(c) -> mark(a)
active(c) -> mark(b)
active(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(X1, X2, active(X3))
f(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(f(X1, X2, X3))
f(X1, X2, mark(X3)) -> mark(f(X1, X2, X3))
f(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(f(X1, X2, X3))
proper(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(a) -> ok(a)
proper(b) -> ok(b)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVE(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> ACTIVE(X3)
ACTIVE(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> ACTIVE(X1)

Rules:

active(f(a, b, X)) -> mark(f(X, X, X))
active(c) -> mark(a)
active(c) -> mark(b)
active(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(X1, X2, active(X3))
f(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(f(X1, X2, X3))
f(X1, X2, mark(X3)) -> mark(f(X1, X2, X3))
f(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(f(X1, X2, X3))
proper(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(a) -> ok(a)
proper(b) -> ok(b)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

ACTIVE(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> ACTIVE(X3)
ACTIVE(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> ACTIVE(X1)

ACTIVE(x₁) -> ACTIVE(x₁)
f(x₁, x₂, x₃) -> f(x₁, x₂, x₃)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 6

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(f(a, b, X)) -> mark(f(X, X, X))
active(c) -> mark(a)
active(c) -> mark(b)
active(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(X1, X2, active(X3))
f(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(f(X1, X2, X3))
f(X1, X2, mark(X3)) -> mark(f(X1, X2, X3))
f(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(f(X1, X2, X3))
proper(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(a) -> ok(a)
proper(b) -> ok(b)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

PROPER(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> PROPER(X3)
PROPER(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> PROPER(X1)

Rules:

active(f(a, b, X)) -> mark(f(X, X, X))
active(c) -> mark(a)
active(c) -> mark(b)
active(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(X1, X2, active(X3))
f(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(f(X1, X2, X3))
f(X1, X2, mark(X3)) -> mark(f(X1, X2, X3))
f(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(f(X1, X2, X3))
proper(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(a) -> ok(a)
proper(b) -> ok(b)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

PROPER(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> PROPER(X3)
PROPER(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> PROPER(X1)

PROPER(x₁) -> PROPER(x₁)
f(x₁, x₂, x₃) -> f(x₁, x₂, x₃)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(f(a, b, X)) -> mark(f(X, X, X))
active(c) -> mark(a)
active(c) -> mark(b)
active(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(X1, X2, active(X3))
f(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(f(X1, X2, X3))
f(X1, X2, mark(X3)) -> mark(f(X1, X2, X3))
f(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(f(X1, X2, X3))
proper(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(a) -> ok(a)
proper(b) -> ok(b)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)

The following remains to be proven:
Dependency Pairs:

TOP(ok(X)) -> TOP(active(X))
TOP(mark(X)) -> TOP(proper(X))

Rules:

active(f(a, b, X)) -> mark(f(X, X, X))
active(c) -> mark(a)
active(c) -> mark(b)
active(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(X1, X2, active(X3))
f(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(f(X1, X2, X3))
f(X1, X2, mark(X3)) -> mark(f(X1, X2, X3))
f(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(f(X1, X2, X3))
proper(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(a) -> ok(a)
proper(b) -> ok(b)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Innermost Termination of R could not be shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes