Term Rewriting System R:
[N, X, Y, X1, X2, XS]
fib(N) -> sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0)))
fib1(X, Y) -> cons(X, nfib1(Y, nadd(X, Y)))
fib1(X1, X2) -> nfib1(X1, X2)
sel(0, cons(X, XS)) -> X
sel(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> sel(N, activate(XS))
activate(nfib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(X) -> X

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

`   R`
`     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis`

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

FIB(N) -> SEL(N, fib1(s(0), s(0)))
FIB(N) -> FIB1(s(0), s(0))
SEL(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> SEL(N, activate(XS))
SEL(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> ACTIVATE(XS)
ACTIVATE(nfib1(X1, X2)) -> FIB1(activate(X1), activate(X2))
ACTIVATE(nfib1(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X1)
ACTIVATE(nfib1(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X2)

Furthermore, R contains three SCCs.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳AFS`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳AFS`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

fib(N) -> sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0)))
fib1(X, Y) -> cons(X, nfib1(Y, nadd(X, Y)))
fib1(X1, X2) -> nfib1(X1, X2)
sel(0, cons(X, XS)) -> X
sel(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> sel(N, activate(XS))
activate(nfib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(X) -> X

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the AFS that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
s(x1) -> s(x1)

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳AFS`
`           →DP Problem 4`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳AFS`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳AFS`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

fib(N) -> sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0)))
fib1(X, Y) -> cons(X, nfib1(Y, nadd(X, Y)))
fib1(X1, X2) -> nfib1(X1, X2)
sel(0, cons(X, XS)) -> X
sel(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> sel(N, activate(XS))
activate(nfib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(X) -> X

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳AFS`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳AFS`

Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVATE(nfib1(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X2)
ACTIVATE(nfib1(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X1)

Rules:

fib(N) -> sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0)))
fib1(X, Y) -> cons(X, nfib1(Y, nadd(X, Y)))
fib1(X1, X2) -> nfib1(X1, X2)
sel(0, cons(X, XS)) -> X
sel(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> sel(N, activate(XS))
activate(nfib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(X) -> X

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

ACTIVATE(nfib1(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X2)
ACTIVATE(nfib1(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X1)

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the AFS that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
ACTIVATE(x1) -> ACTIVATE(x1)
nfib1(x1, x2) -> nfib1(x1, x2)

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳AFS`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳AFS`
`           →DP Problem 5`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳AFS`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

fib(N) -> sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0)))
fib1(X, Y) -> cons(X, nfib1(Y, nadd(X, Y)))
fib1(X1, X2) -> nfib1(X1, X2)
sel(0, cons(X, XS)) -> X
sel(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> sel(N, activate(XS))
activate(nfib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(X) -> X

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳AFS`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳AFS`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering`

Dependency Pair:

SEL(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> SEL(N, activate(XS))

Rules:

fib(N) -> sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0)))
fib1(X, Y) -> cons(X, nfib1(Y, nadd(X, Y)))
fib1(X1, X2) -> nfib1(X1, X2)
sel(0, cons(X, XS)) -> X
sel(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> sel(N, activate(XS))
activate(nfib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(X) -> X

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

SEL(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> SEL(N, activate(XS))

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the AFS that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
SEL(x1, x2) -> x1
s(x1) -> s(x1)

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳AFS`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳AFS`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳AFS`
`           →DP Problem 6`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

fib(N) -> sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0)))
fib1(X, Y) -> cons(X, nfib1(Y, nadd(X, Y)))
fib1(X1, X2) -> nfib1(X1, X2)
sel(0, cons(X, XS)) -> X
sel(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> sel(N, activate(XS))
activate(nfib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(X) -> X

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes