Termination Proof using AProVE

Term Rewriting System R:
[N, X, Y, XS, X1, X2]
active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVE(fib(N)) -> SEL(N, fib1(s(0), s(0)))
ACTIVE(fib(N)) -> FIB1(s(0), s(0))
ACTIVE(fib(N)) -> S(0)
ACTIVE(fib1(X, Y)) -> CONS(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y)))
ACTIVE(fib1(X, Y)) -> FIB1(Y, add(X, Y))
ACTIVE(fib1(X, Y)) -> ADD(X, Y)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) -> S(add(X, Y))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) -> ADD(X, Y)
ACTIVE(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> SEL(N, XS)
ACTIVE(fib(X)) -> FIB(active(X))
ACTIVE(fib(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> SEL(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> SEL(X1, active(X2))
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(fib1(X1, X2)) -> FIB1(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(fib1(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(fib1(X1, X2)) -> FIB1(X1, active(X2))
ACTIVE(fib1(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(s(X)) -> S(active(X))
ACTIVE(s(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) -> CONS(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) -> ADD(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) -> ADD(X1, active(X2))
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X2)
FIB(mark(X)) -> FIB(X)
FIB(ok(X)) -> FIB(X)
SEL(mark(X1), X2) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(X1, mark(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)
FIB1(mark(X1), X2) -> FIB1(X1, X2)
FIB1(X1, mark(X2)) -> FIB1(X1, X2)
FIB1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> FIB1(X1, X2)
S(mark(X)) -> S(X)
S(ok(X)) -> S(X)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) -> CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> CONS(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) -> ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) -> ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ADD(X1, X2)
PROPER(fib(X)) -> FIB(proper(X))
PROPER(fib(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> SEL(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(fib1(X1, X2)) -> FIB1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(fib1(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(fib1(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(s(X)) -> S(proper(X))
PROPER(s(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> CONS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) -> ADD(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
TOP(mark(X)) -> TOP(proper(X))
TOP(mark(X)) -> PROPER(X)
TOP(ok(X)) -> TOP(active(X))
TOP(ok(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)

Furthermore, R contains nine SCCs.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 9

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

SEL(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(mark(X1), X2) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(X1, mark(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)

Rules:

active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

SEL(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(mark(X1), X2) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(X1, mark(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

SEL(x₁, x₂) -> SEL(x₁, x₂)
mark(x₁) -> mark(x₁)
ok(x₁) -> ok(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 9

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 9

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

FIB1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> FIB1(X1, X2)
FIB1(X1, mark(X2)) -> FIB1(X1, X2)
FIB1(mark(X1), X2) -> FIB1(X1, X2)

Rules:

active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

FIB1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> FIB1(X1, X2)
FIB1(X1, mark(X2)) -> FIB1(X1, X2)
FIB1(mark(X1), X2) -> FIB1(X1, X2)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

FIB1(x₁, x₂) -> FIB1(x₁, x₂)
mark(x₁) -> mark(x₁)
ok(x₁) -> ok(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 11

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 9

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 9

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

CONS(mark(X1), X2) -> CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> CONS(X1, X2)

Rules:

active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

CONS(mark(X1), X2) -> CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> CONS(X1, X2)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

CONS(x₁, x₂) -> CONS(x₁, x₂)
mark(x₁) -> mark(x₁)
ok(x₁) -> ok(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 12

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 9

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 9

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

S(ok(X)) -> S(X)
S(mark(X)) -> S(X)

Rules:

active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

S(ok(X)) -> S(X)
S(mark(X)) -> S(X)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

S(x₁) -> S(x₁)
ok(x₁) -> ok(x₁)
mark(x₁) -> mark(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 13

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 9

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 9

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

FIB(ok(X)) -> FIB(X)
FIB(mark(X)) -> FIB(X)

Rules:

active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

FIB(ok(X)) -> FIB(X)
FIB(mark(X)) -> FIB(X)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

FIB(x₁) -> FIB(x₁)
ok(x₁) -> ok(x₁)
mark(x₁) -> mark(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 14

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 9

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 9

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

ADD(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) -> ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) -> ADD(X1, X2)

Rules:

active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

ADD(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) -> ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) -> ADD(X1, X2)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

ADD(x₁, x₂) -> ADD(x₁, x₂)
mark(x₁) -> mark(x₁)
ok(x₁) -> ok(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 15

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 9

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 9

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(s(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(fib1(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(fib1(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(fib(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)

Rules:

active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(s(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(fib1(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(fib1(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(fib(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

ACTIVE(x₁) -> ACTIVE(x₁)
add(x₁, x₂) -> add(x₁, x₂)
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)
sel(x₁, x₂) -> sel(x₁, x₂)
fib1(x₁, x₂) -> fib1(x₁, x₂)
cons(x₁, x₂) -> cons(x₁, x₂)
fib(x₁) -> fib(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 16

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 9

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 9

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

PROPER(add(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(s(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(fib1(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(fib1(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(fib(X)) -> PROPER(X)

Rules:

active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

PROPER(add(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(s(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(fib1(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(fib1(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(fib(X)) -> PROPER(X)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

PROPER(x₁) -> PROPER(x₁)
add(x₁, x₂) -> add(x₁, x₂)
sel(x₁, x₂) -> sel(x₁, x₂)
cons(x₁, x₂) -> cons(x₁, x₂)
fib1(x₁, x₂) -> fib1(x₁, x₂)
fib(x₁) -> fib(x₁)
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 17

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 9

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 9

         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)

The following remains to be proven:
Dependency Pairs:

TOP(ok(X)) -> TOP(active(X))
TOP(mark(X)) -> TOP(proper(X))

Rules:

active(fib(N)) -> mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) -> mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) -> mark(sel(N, XS))
active(fib(X)) -> fib(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(active(X1), X2)
active(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) -> add(X1, active(X2))
fib(mark(X)) -> mark(fib(X))
fib(ok(X)) -> ok(fib(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
fib1(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(fib1(X1, X2))
fib1(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(fib1(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(add(X1, X2))
proper(fib(X)) -> fib(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(fib1(X1, X2)) -> fib1(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(add(X1, X2)) -> add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Innermost Termination of R could not be shown.
Duration:
0:04 minutes