Term Rewriting System R:
[X, Y, Z, X1]
2nd(cons1(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> Y
2nd(cons(X, X1)) -> 2nd(cons1(X, activate(X1)))
from(X) -> cons(X, nfrom(ns(X)))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
s(X) -> ns(X)
activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(ns(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X

Innermost Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

2ND(cons(X, X1)) -> 2ND(cons1(X, activate(X1)))
2ND(cons(X, X1)) -> ACTIVATE(X1)
ACTIVATE(nfrom(X)) -> FROM(activate(X))
ACTIVATE(nfrom(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(ns(X)) -> S(activate(X))
ACTIVATE(ns(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)

Furthermore, R contains one SCC. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Usable Rules (Innermost)


Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVATE(ns(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(nfrom(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)


Rules:


2nd(cons1(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> Y
2nd(cons(X, X1)) -> 2nd(cons1(X, activate(X1)))
from(X) -> cons(X, nfrom(ns(X)))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
s(X) -> ns(X)
activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(ns(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X


Strategy:

innermost




As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 8 non-usable-rules.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳Size-Change Principle


Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVATE(ns(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(nfrom(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We number the DPs as follows:
  1. ACTIVATE(ns(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
  2. ACTIVATE(nfrom(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1, 2} , {1, 2}
1>1

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1, 2} , {1, 2}
1>1

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
nfrom(x1) -> nfrom(x1)
ns(x1) -> ns(x1)

We obtain no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes