Term Rewriting System R:
[X, Y, Z]
f(X) -> cons(X, nf(ng(X)))
f(X) -> nf(X)
g(0) -> s(0)
g(s(X)) -> s(s(g(X)))
g(X) -> ng(X)
sel(0, cons(X, Y)) -> X
sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z))
activate(nf(X)) -> f(activate(X))
activate(ng(X)) -> g(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

`   R`
`     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis`

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

G(s(X)) -> G(X)
SEL(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> SEL(X, activate(Z))
SEL(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> ACTIVATE(Z)
ACTIVATE(nf(X)) -> F(activate(X))
ACTIVATE(nf(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(ng(X)) -> G(activate(X))
ACTIVATE(ng(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)

Furthermore, R contains three SCCs.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pair:

G(s(X)) -> G(X)

Rules:

f(X) -> cons(X, nf(ng(X)))
f(X) -> nf(X)
g(0) -> s(0)
g(s(X)) -> s(s(g(X)))
g(X) -> ng(X)
sel(0, cons(X, Y)) -> X
sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z))
activate(nf(X)) -> f(activate(X))
activate(ng(X)) -> g(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

G(s(X)) -> G(X)

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(G(x1)) =  x1 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 4`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

f(X) -> cons(X, nf(ng(X)))
f(X) -> nf(X)
g(0) -> s(0)
g(s(X)) -> s(s(g(X)))
g(X) -> ng(X)
sel(0, cons(X, Y)) -> X
sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z))
activate(nf(X)) -> f(activate(X))
activate(ng(X)) -> g(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVATE(ng(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(nf(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)

Rules:

f(X) -> cons(X, nf(ng(X)))
f(X) -> nf(X)
g(0) -> s(0)
g(s(X)) -> s(s(g(X)))
g(X) -> ng(X)
sel(0, cons(X, Y)) -> X
sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z))
activate(nf(X)) -> f(activate(X))
activate(ng(X)) -> g(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

ACTIVATE(ng(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(n__f(x1)) =  x1 POL(n__g(x1)) =  1 + x1 POL(ACTIVATE(x1)) =  x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 5`
`             ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pair:

ACTIVATE(nf(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)

Rules:

f(X) -> cons(X, nf(ng(X)))
f(X) -> nf(X)
g(0) -> s(0)
g(s(X)) -> s(s(g(X)))
g(X) -> ng(X)
sel(0, cons(X, Y)) -> X
sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z))
activate(nf(X)) -> f(activate(X))
activate(ng(X)) -> g(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

ACTIVATE(nf(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(n__f(x1)) =  1 + x1 POL(ACTIVATE(x1)) =  x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 5`
`             ↳Polo`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 6`
`                 ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

f(X) -> cons(X, nf(ng(X)))
f(X) -> nf(X)
g(0) -> s(0)
g(s(X)) -> s(s(g(X)))
g(X) -> ng(X)
sel(0, cons(X, Y)) -> X
sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z))
activate(nf(X)) -> f(activate(X))
activate(ng(X)) -> g(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`

Dependency Pair:

SEL(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> SEL(X, activate(Z))

Rules:

f(X) -> cons(X, nf(ng(X)))
f(X) -> nf(X)
g(0) -> s(0)
g(s(X)) -> s(s(g(X)))
g(X) -> ng(X)
sel(0, cons(X, Y)) -> X
sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z))
activate(nf(X)) -> f(activate(X))
activate(ng(X)) -> g(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

SEL(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> SEL(X, activate(Z))

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(activate(x1)) =  0 POL(n__f(x1)) =  0 POL(0) =  0 POL(g(x1)) =  0 POL(cons(x1, x2)) =  0 POL(SEL(x1, x2)) =  x1 POL(n__g(x1)) =  0 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1 POL(f(x1)) =  0

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 7`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

f(X) -> cons(X, nf(ng(X)))
f(X) -> nf(X)
g(0) -> s(0)
g(s(X)) -> s(s(g(X)))
g(X) -> ng(X)
sel(0, cons(X, Y)) -> X
sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z))
activate(nf(X)) -> f(activate(X))
activate(ng(X)) -> g(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes