Termination Proof using AProVE

Term Rewriting System R:
[X, Y, Z, X1, X2]
active(f(X)) -> mark(cons(X, f(g(X))))
active(g(0)) -> mark(s(0))
active(g(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(g(X))))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(f(X)) -> f(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(g(X)) -> g(active(X))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
f(mark(X)) -> mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) -> ok(f(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
proper(f(X)) -> f(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(g(X)) -> g(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVE(f(X)) -> CONS(X, f(g(X)))
ACTIVE(f(X)) -> F(g(X))
ACTIVE(f(X)) -> G(X)
ACTIVE(g(0)) -> S(0)
ACTIVE(g(s(X))) -> S(s(g(X)))
ACTIVE(g(s(X))) -> S(g(X))
ACTIVE(g(s(X))) -> G(X)
ACTIVE(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> SEL(X, Z)
ACTIVE(f(X)) -> F(active(X))
ACTIVE(f(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) -> CONS(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(g(X)) -> G(active(X))
ACTIVE(g(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) -> S(active(X))
ACTIVE(s(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> SEL(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> SEL(X1, active(X2))
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X2)
F(mark(X)) -> F(X)
F(ok(X)) -> F(X)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) -> CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> CONS(X1, X2)
G(mark(X)) -> G(X)
G(ok(X)) -> G(X)
S(mark(X)) -> S(X)
S(ok(X)) -> S(X)
SEL(mark(X1), X2) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(X1, mark(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)
PROPER(f(X)) -> F(proper(X))
PROPER(f(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> CONS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(g(X)) -> G(proper(X))
PROPER(g(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(s(X)) -> S(proper(X))
PROPER(s(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> SEL(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
TOP(mark(X)) -> TOP(proper(X))
TOP(mark(X)) -> PROPER(X)
TOP(ok(X)) -> TOP(active(X))
TOP(ok(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)

Furthermore, R contains eight SCCs.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

F(ok(X)) -> F(X)
F(mark(X)) -> F(X)

Rules:

active(f(X)) -> mark(cons(X, f(g(X))))
active(g(0)) -> mark(s(0))
active(g(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(g(X))))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(f(X)) -> f(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(g(X)) -> g(active(X))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
f(mark(X)) -> mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) -> ok(f(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
proper(f(X)) -> f(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(g(X)) -> g(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

F(ok(X)) -> F(X)
F(mark(X)) -> F(X)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

F(x₁) -> F(x₁)
mark(x₁) -> mark(x₁)
ok(x₁) -> ok(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 9

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(f(X)) -> mark(cons(X, f(g(X))))
active(g(0)) -> mark(s(0))
active(g(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(g(X))))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(f(X)) -> f(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(g(X)) -> g(active(X))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
f(mark(X)) -> mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) -> ok(f(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
proper(f(X)) -> f(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(g(X)) -> g(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

S(ok(X)) -> S(X)
S(mark(X)) -> S(X)

Rules:

active(f(X)) -> mark(cons(X, f(g(X))))
active(g(0)) -> mark(s(0))
active(g(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(g(X))))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(f(X)) -> f(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(g(X)) -> g(active(X))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
f(mark(X)) -> mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) -> ok(f(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
proper(f(X)) -> f(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(g(X)) -> g(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

S(ok(X)) -> S(X)
S(mark(X)) -> S(X)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

S(x₁) -> S(x₁)
ok(x₁) -> ok(x₁)
mark(x₁) -> mark(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(f(X)) -> mark(cons(X, f(g(X))))
active(g(0)) -> mark(s(0))
active(g(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(g(X))))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(f(X)) -> f(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(g(X)) -> g(active(X))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
f(mark(X)) -> mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) -> ok(f(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
proper(f(X)) -> f(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(g(X)) -> g(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

SEL(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(mark(X1), X2) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(X1, mark(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)

Rules:

active(f(X)) -> mark(cons(X, f(g(X))))
active(g(0)) -> mark(s(0))
active(g(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(g(X))))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(f(X)) -> f(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(g(X)) -> g(active(X))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
f(mark(X)) -> mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) -> ok(f(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
proper(f(X)) -> f(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(g(X)) -> g(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

SEL(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(mark(X1), X2) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(X1, mark(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

SEL(x₁, x₂) -> SEL(x₁, x₂)
mark(x₁) -> mark(x₁)
ok(x₁) -> ok(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 11

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(f(X)) -> mark(cons(X, f(g(X))))
active(g(0)) -> mark(s(0))
active(g(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(g(X))))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(f(X)) -> f(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(g(X)) -> g(active(X))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
f(mark(X)) -> mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) -> ok(f(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
proper(f(X)) -> f(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(g(X)) -> g(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) -> CONS(X1, X2)

Rules:

active(f(X)) -> mark(cons(X, f(g(X))))
active(g(0)) -> mark(s(0))
active(g(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(g(X))))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(f(X)) -> f(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(g(X)) -> g(active(X))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
f(mark(X)) -> mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) -> ok(f(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
proper(f(X)) -> f(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(g(X)) -> g(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) -> CONS(X1, X2)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

CONS(x₁, x₂) -> CONS(x₁, x₂)
mark(x₁) -> mark(x₁)
ok(x₁) -> ok(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 12

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(f(X)) -> mark(cons(X, f(g(X))))
active(g(0)) -> mark(s(0))
active(g(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(g(X))))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(f(X)) -> f(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(g(X)) -> g(active(X))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
f(mark(X)) -> mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) -> ok(f(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
proper(f(X)) -> f(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(g(X)) -> g(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

G(ok(X)) -> G(X)
G(mark(X)) -> G(X)

Rules:

active(f(X)) -> mark(cons(X, f(g(X))))
active(g(0)) -> mark(s(0))
active(g(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(g(X))))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(f(X)) -> f(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(g(X)) -> g(active(X))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
f(mark(X)) -> mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) -> ok(f(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
proper(f(X)) -> f(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(g(X)) -> g(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

G(ok(X)) -> G(X)
G(mark(X)) -> G(X)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

G(x₁) -> G(x₁)
ok(x₁) -> ok(x₁)
mark(x₁) -> mark(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 13

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(f(X)) -> mark(cons(X, f(g(X))))
active(g(0)) -> mark(s(0))
active(g(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(g(X))))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(f(X)) -> f(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(g(X)) -> g(active(X))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
f(mark(X)) -> mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) -> ok(f(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
proper(f(X)) -> f(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(g(X)) -> g(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(s(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(g(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(f(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)

Rules:

active(f(X)) -> mark(cons(X, f(g(X))))
active(g(0)) -> mark(s(0))
active(g(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(g(X))))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(f(X)) -> f(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(g(X)) -> g(active(X))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
f(mark(X)) -> mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) -> ok(f(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
proper(f(X)) -> f(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(g(X)) -> g(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(s(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(g(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(f(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

ACTIVE(x₁) -> ACTIVE(x₁)
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)
sel(x₁, x₂) -> sel(x₁, x₂)
cons(x₁, x₂) -> cons(x₁, x₂)
g(x₁) -> g(x₁)
f(x₁) -> f(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 14

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(f(X)) -> mark(cons(X, f(g(X))))
active(g(0)) -> mark(s(0))
active(g(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(g(X))))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(f(X)) -> f(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(g(X)) -> g(active(X))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
f(mark(X)) -> mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) -> ok(f(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
proper(f(X)) -> f(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(g(X)) -> g(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pairs:

PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(s(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(g(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(f(X)) -> PROPER(X)

Rules:

active(f(X)) -> mark(cons(X, f(g(X))))
active(g(0)) -> mark(s(0))
active(g(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(g(X))))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(f(X)) -> f(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(g(X)) -> g(active(X))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
f(mark(X)) -> mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) -> ok(f(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
proper(f(X)) -> f(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(g(X)) -> g(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(s(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(g(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(f(X)) -> PROPER(X)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

PROPER(x₁) -> PROPER(x₁)
f(x₁) -> f(x₁)
sel(x₁, x₂) -> sel(x₁, x₂)
cons(x₁, x₂) -> cons(x₁, x₂)
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)
g(x₁) -> g(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 15

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳Remaining

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(f(X)) -> mark(cons(X, f(g(X))))
active(g(0)) -> mark(s(0))
active(g(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(g(X))))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(f(X)) -> f(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(g(X)) -> g(active(X))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
f(mark(X)) -> mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) -> ok(f(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
proper(f(X)) -> f(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(g(X)) -> g(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 7

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 8

         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)

The following remains to be proven:
Dependency Pairs:

TOP(ok(X)) -> TOP(active(X))
TOP(mark(X)) -> TOP(proper(X))

Rules:

active(f(X)) -> mark(cons(X, f(g(X))))
active(g(0)) -> mark(s(0))
active(g(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(g(X))))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(f(X)) -> f(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
active(g(X)) -> g(active(X))
active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
f(mark(X)) -> mark(f(X))
f(ok(X)) -> ok(f(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
proper(f(X)) -> f(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(g(X)) -> g(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Strategy:

innermost

Innermost Termination of R could not be shown.
Duration:
0:01 minutes