Term Rewriting System R:
[X]
f(0) -> cons(0, nf(ns(n0)))
f(s(0)) -> f(p(s(0)))
f(X) -> nf(X)
p(s(0)) -> 0
s(X) -> ns(X)
0 -> n0
activate(nf(X)) -> f(activate(X))
activate(ns(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(n0) -> 0
activate(X) -> X

Innermost Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

F(s(0)) -> F(p(s(0)))
F(s(0)) -> P(s(0))
ACTIVATE(nf(X)) -> F(activate(X))
ACTIVATE(nf(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(ns(X)) -> S(activate(X))
ACTIVATE(ns(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n0) -> 0'

Furthermore, R contains one SCC. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering


Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVATE(ns(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(nf(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)


Rules:


f(0) -> cons(0, nf(ns(n0)))
f(s(0)) -> f(p(s(0)))
f(X) -> nf(X)
p(s(0)) -> 0
s(X) -> ns(X)
0 -> n0
activate(nf(X)) -> f(activate(X))
activate(ns(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(n0) -> 0
activate(X) -> X


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

ACTIVATE(ns(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(nf(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)


There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
ACTIVATE(x1) -> ACTIVATE(x1)
ns(x1) -> ns(x1)
nf(x1) -> nf(x1)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳Dependency Graph


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


f(0) -> cons(0, nf(ns(n0)))
f(s(0)) -> f(p(s(0)))
f(X) -> nf(X)
p(s(0)) -> 0
s(X) -> ns(X)
0 -> n0
activate(nf(X)) -> f(activate(X))
activate(ns(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(n0) -> 0
activate(X) -> X


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes