Term Rewriting System R:
[X, Y, X1, X2]
f(g(X), Y) -> f(X, nf(ng(X), activate(Y)))
f(X1, X2) -> nf(X1, X2)
g(X) -> ng(X)
activate(nf(X1, X2)) -> f(activate(X1), X2)
activate(ng(X)) -> g(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X

Innermost Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

F(g(X), Y) -> F(X, nf(ng(X), activate(Y)))
F(g(X), Y) -> ACTIVATE(Y)
ACTIVATE(nf(X1, X2)) -> F(activate(X1), X2)
ACTIVATE(nf(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X1)
ACTIVATE(ng(X)) -> G(activate(X))
ACTIVATE(ng(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)

Furthermore, R contains one SCC. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering


Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVATE(ng(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(nf(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X1)


Rules:


f(g(X), Y) -> f(X, nf(ng(X), activate(Y)))
f(X1, X2) -> nf(X1, X2)
g(X) -> ng(X)
activate(nf(X1, X2)) -> f(activate(X1), X2)
activate(ng(X)) -> g(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

ACTIVATE(ng(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(nf(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X1)


There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
ACTIVATE(x1) -> ACTIVATE(x1)
ng(x1) -> ng(x1)
nf(x1, x2) -> nf(x1, x2)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳Dependency Graph


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


f(g(X), Y) -> f(X, nf(ng(X), activate(Y)))
f(X1, X2) -> nf(X1, X2)
g(X) -> ng(X)
activate(nf(X1, X2)) -> f(activate(X1), X2)
activate(ng(X)) -> g(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes