Term Rewriting System R:
[X, Y, Z, X1, X2]
dbl(0) -> 0
dbl(s(X)) -> s(ns(ndbl(activate(X))))
dbl(X) -> ndbl(X)
dbls(nil) -> nil
dbls(cons(X, Y)) -> cons(ndbl(activate(X)), ndbls(activate(Y)))
dbls(X) -> ndbls(X)
sel(0, cons(X, Y)) -> activate(X)
sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(activate(X), activate(Z))
sel(X1, X2) -> nsel(X1, X2)
indx(nil, X) -> nil
indx(cons(X, Y), Z) -> cons(nsel(activate(X), activate(Z)), nindx(activate(Y), activate(Z)))
indx(X1, X2) -> nindx(X1, X2)
from(X) -> cons(activate(X), nfrom(ns(activate(X))))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
s(X) -> ns(X)
activate(ns(X)) -> s(X)
activate(ndbl(X)) -> dbl(X)
activate(ndbls(X)) -> dbls(X)
activate(nsel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, X2)
activate(nindx(X1, X2)) -> indx(X1, X2)
activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(X)
activate(X) -> X

Innermost Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

DBL(s(X)) -> S(ns(ndbl(activate(X))))
DBL(s(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
DBLS(cons(X, Y)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
DBLS(cons(X, Y)) -> ACTIVATE(Y)
SEL(0, cons(X, Y)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
SEL(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> SEL(activate(X), activate(Z))
SEL(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
SEL(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> ACTIVATE(Z)
INDX(cons(X, Y), Z) -> ACTIVATE(X)
INDX(cons(X, Y), Z) -> ACTIVATE(Z)
INDX(cons(X, Y), Z) -> ACTIVATE(Y)
FROM(X) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(ns(X)) -> S(X)
ACTIVATE(ndbl(X)) -> DBL(X)
ACTIVATE(ndbls(X)) -> DBLS(X)
ACTIVATE(nsel(X1, X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)
ACTIVATE(nindx(X1, X2)) -> INDX(X1, X2)
ACTIVATE(nfrom(X)) -> FROM(X)

Furthermore, R contains one SCC. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering


Dependency Pairs:

INDX(cons(X, Y), Z) -> ACTIVATE(Y)
INDX(cons(X, Y), Z) -> ACTIVATE(Z)
FROM(X) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(nfrom(X)) -> FROM(X)
INDX(cons(X, Y), Z) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(nindx(X1, X2)) -> INDX(X1, X2)
SEL(0, cons(X, Y)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(nsel(X1, X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)
DBLS(cons(X, Y)) -> ACTIVATE(Y)
ACTIVATE(ndbls(X)) -> DBLS(X)
DBLS(cons(X, Y)) -> ACTIVATE(X)


Rules:


dbl(0) -> 0
dbl(s(X)) -> s(ns(ndbl(activate(X))))
dbl(X) -> ndbl(X)
dbls(nil) -> nil
dbls(cons(X, Y)) -> cons(ndbl(activate(X)), ndbls(activate(Y)))
dbls(X) -> ndbls(X)
sel(0, cons(X, Y)) -> activate(X)
sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(activate(X), activate(Z))
sel(X1, X2) -> nsel(X1, X2)
indx(nil, X) -> nil
indx(cons(X, Y), Z) -> cons(nsel(activate(X), activate(Z)), nindx(activate(Y), activate(Z)))
indx(X1, X2) -> nindx(X1, X2)
from(X) -> cons(activate(X), nfrom(ns(activate(X))))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
s(X) -> ns(X)
activate(ns(X)) -> s(X)
activate(ndbl(X)) -> dbl(X)
activate(ndbls(X)) -> dbls(X)
activate(nsel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, X2)
activate(nindx(X1, X2)) -> indx(X1, X2)
activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(X)
activate(X) -> X


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

INDX(cons(X, Y), Z) -> ACTIVATE(Y)
INDX(cons(X, Y), Z) -> ACTIVATE(Z)
FROM(X) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(nfrom(X)) -> FROM(X)
INDX(cons(X, Y), Z) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(nindx(X1, X2)) -> INDX(X1, X2)
SEL(0, cons(X, Y)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(nsel(X1, X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)
DBLS(cons(X, Y)) -> ACTIVATE(Y)
ACTIVATE(ndbls(X)) -> DBLS(X)
DBLS(cons(X, Y)) -> ACTIVATE(X)


There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the AFS that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order with Non-Strict Precedence with Quasi Precedence:
{nfrom, FROM} > {cons, ACTIVATE}
{nsel, SEL}
{INDX, nindx} > {cons, ACTIVATE}
ndbls > DBLS > {cons, ACTIVATE}

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
INDX(x1, x2) -> INDX(x1, x2)
ACTIVATE(x1) -> ACTIVATE(x1)
cons(x1, x2) -> cons(x1, x2)
nindx(x1, x2) -> nindx(x1, x2)
DBLS(x1) -> DBLS(x1)
SEL(x1, x2) -> SEL(x1, x2)
nfrom(x1) -> nfrom(x1)
FROM(x1) -> FROM(x1)
ndbls(x1) -> ndbls(x1)
nsel(x1, x2) -> nsel(x1, x2)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳Dependency Graph


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


dbl(0) -> 0
dbl(s(X)) -> s(ns(ndbl(activate(X))))
dbl(X) -> ndbl(X)
dbls(nil) -> nil
dbls(cons(X, Y)) -> cons(ndbl(activate(X)), ndbls(activate(Y)))
dbls(X) -> ndbls(X)
sel(0, cons(X, Y)) -> activate(X)
sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(activate(X), activate(Z))
sel(X1, X2) -> nsel(X1, X2)
indx(nil, X) -> nil
indx(cons(X, Y), Z) -> cons(nsel(activate(X), activate(Z)), nindx(activate(Y), activate(Z)))
indx(X1, X2) -> nindx(X1, X2)
from(X) -> cons(activate(X), nfrom(ns(activate(X))))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
s(X) -> ns(X)
activate(ns(X)) -> s(X)
activate(ndbl(X)) -> dbl(X)
activate(ndbls(X)) -> dbls(X)
activate(nsel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, X2)
activate(nindx(X1, X2)) -> indx(X1, X2)
activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(X)
activate(X) -> X


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes