Term Rewriting System R:
[X, Y, Z, X1, X2]
active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) -> S(s(dbl(X)))
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) -> S(dbl(X))
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) -> DBL(X)
ACTIVE(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> CONS(dbl(X), dbls(Y))
ACTIVE(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> DBL(X)
ACTIVE(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> DBLS(Y)
ACTIVE(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> SEL(X, Z)
ACTIVE(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> CONS(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z))
ACTIVE(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> SEL(X, Z)
ACTIVE(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> INDX(Y, Z)
ACTIVE(from(X)) -> CONS(X, from(s(X)))
ACTIVE(from(X)) -> FROM(s(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) -> S(X)
ACTIVE(dbl(X)) -> DBL(active(X))
ACTIVE(dbl(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(dbls(X)) -> DBLS(active(X))
ACTIVE(dbls(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> SEL(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> SEL(X1, active(X2))
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(indx(X1, X2)) -> INDX(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(indx(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
DBL(mark(X)) -> DBL(X)
DBL(ok(X)) -> DBL(X)
DBLS(mark(X)) -> DBLS(X)
DBLS(ok(X)) -> DBLS(X)
SEL(mark(X1), X2) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(X1, mark(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)
INDX(mark(X1), X2) -> INDX(X1, X2)
INDX(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> INDX(X1, X2)
PROPER(dbl(X)) -> DBL(proper(X))
PROPER(dbl(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(s(X)) -> S(proper(X))
PROPER(s(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(dbls(X)) -> DBLS(proper(X))
PROPER(dbls(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> CONS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> SEL(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(indx(X1, X2)) -> INDX(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(indx(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(indx(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(from(X)) -> FROM(proper(X))
PROPER(from(X)) -> PROPER(X)
S(ok(X)) -> S(X)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> CONS(X1, X2)
FROM(ok(X)) -> FROM(X)
TOP(mark(X)) -> TOP(proper(X))
TOP(mark(X)) -> PROPER(X)
TOP(ok(X)) -> TOP(active(X))
TOP(ok(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)

Furthermore, R contains 10 SCCs. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:

S(ok(X)) -> S(X)


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

S(ok(X)) -> S(X)


There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
S(x1) -> S(x1)
ok(x1) -> ok(x1)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 11
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pairs:

DBL(ok(X)) -> DBL(X)
DBL(mark(X)) -> DBL(X)


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

DBL(ok(X)) -> DBL(X)
DBL(mark(X)) -> DBL(X)


There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
DBL(x1) -> DBL(x1)
ok(x1) -> ok(x1)
mark(x1) -> mark(x1)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 12
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:

CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> CONS(X1, X2)


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> CONS(X1, X2)


There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
CONS(x1, x2) -> CONS(x1, x2)
ok(x1) -> ok(x1)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 13
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pairs:

DBLS(ok(X)) -> DBLS(X)
DBLS(mark(X)) -> DBLS(X)


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

DBLS(ok(X)) -> DBLS(X)
DBLS(mark(X)) -> DBLS(X)


There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
DBLS(x1) -> DBLS(x1)
ok(x1) -> ok(x1)
mark(x1) -> mark(x1)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 14
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pairs:

SEL(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(X1, mark(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(mark(X1), X2) -> SEL(X1, X2)


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

SEL(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(X1, mark(X2)) -> SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(mark(X1), X2) -> SEL(X1, X2)


There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
SEL(x1, x2) -> SEL(x1, x2)
mark(x1) -> mark(x1)
ok(x1) -> ok(x1)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 15
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pairs:

INDX(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> INDX(X1, X2)
INDX(mark(X1), X2) -> INDX(X1, X2)


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

INDX(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> INDX(X1, X2)
INDX(mark(X1), X2) -> INDX(X1, X2)


There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
INDX(x1, x2) -> INDX(x1, x2)
mark(x1) -> mark(x1)
ok(x1) -> ok(x1)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 16
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:

FROM(ok(X)) -> FROM(X)


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

FROM(ok(X)) -> FROM(X)


There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
FROM(x1) -> FROM(x1)
ok(x1) -> ok(x1)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 17
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVE(indx(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(dbls(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(dbl(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

ACTIVE(indx(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(sel(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(dbls(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(dbl(X)) -> ACTIVE(X)


There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
ACTIVE(x1) -> ACTIVE(x1)
sel(x1, x2) -> sel(x1, x2)
indx(x1, x2) -> indx(x1, x2)
dbl(x1) -> dbl(x1)
dbls(x1) -> dbls(x1)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 18
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pairs:

PROPER(from(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(indx(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(indx(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(dbls(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(s(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(dbl(X)) -> PROPER(X)


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

PROPER(from(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(indx(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(indx(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(sel(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X2)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) -> PROPER(X1)
PROPER(dbls(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(s(X)) -> PROPER(X)
PROPER(dbl(X)) -> PROPER(X)


There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
PROPER(x1) -> PROPER(x1)
sel(x1, x2) -> sel(x1, x2)
indx(x1, x2) -> indx(x1, x2)
cons(x1, x2) -> cons(x1, x2)
dbls(x1) -> dbls(x1)
from(x1) -> from(x1)
s(x1) -> s(x1)
dbl(x1) -> dbl(x1)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 19
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 7
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 8
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 9
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 10
         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)




The following remains to be proven:
Dependency Pairs:

TOP(ok(X)) -> TOP(active(X))
TOP(mark(X)) -> TOP(proper(X))


Rules:


active(dbl(0)) -> mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) -> mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(dbls(nil)) -> mark(nil)
active(dbls(cons(X, Y))) -> mark(cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, Y))) -> mark(X)
active(sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(sel(X, Z))
active(indx(nil, X)) -> mark(nil)
active(indx(cons(X, Y), Z)) -> mark(cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)))
active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(dbl(X)) -> dbl(active(X))
active(dbls(X)) -> dbls(active(X))
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(active(X1), X2)
active(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, active(X2))
active(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(active(X1), X2)
dbl(mark(X)) -> mark(dbl(X))
dbl(ok(X)) -> ok(dbl(X))
dbls(mark(X)) -> mark(dbls(X))
dbls(ok(X)) -> ok(dbls(X))
sel(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(sel(X1, X2))
sel(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(sel(X1, X2))
indx(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(indx(X1, X2))
indx(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(indx(X1, X2))
proper(dbl(X)) -> dbl(proper(X))
proper(0) -> ok(0)
proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
proper(dbls(X)) -> dbls(proper(X))
proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))


Strategy:

innermost



Innermost Termination of R could not be shown.
Duration:
0:04 minutes