Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y, z]
rev(nil) -> nil
rev(rev(x)) -> x
rev(++(x, y)) -> ++(rev(y), rev(x))
++(nil, y) -> y
++(x, nil) -> x
++(.(x, y), z) -> .(x, ++(y, z))
++(x, ++(y, z)) -> ++(++(x, y), z)
make(x) -> .(x, nil)

Innermost Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

REV(++(x, y)) -> ++'(rev(y), rev(x))
REV(++(x, y)) -> REV(y)
REV(++(x, y)) -> REV(x)
++'(.(x, y), z) -> ++'(y, z)
++'(x, ++(y, z)) -> ++'(++(x, y), z)
++'(x, ++(y, z)) -> ++'(x, y)

Furthermore, R contains two SCCs. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS


Dependency Pairs:

++'(x, ++(y, z)) -> ++'(x, y)
++'(x, ++(y, z)) -> ++'(++(x, y), z)
++'(.(x, y), z) -> ++'(y, z)


Rules:


rev(nil) -> nil
rev(rev(x)) -> x
rev(++(x, y)) -> ++(rev(y), rev(x))
++(nil, y) -> y
++(x, nil) -> x
++(.(x, y), z) -> .(x, ++(y, z))
++(x, ++(y, z)) -> ++(++(x, y), z)
make(x) -> .(x, nil)


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

++'(x, ++(y, z)) -> ++'(x, y)
++'(x, ++(y, z)) -> ++'(++(x, y), z)


There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the AFS that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order with Non-Strict Precedence with Quasi Precedence:
trivial

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
++'(x1, x2) -> x2
++(x1, x2) -> ++(x1, x2)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 3
             ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS


Dependency Pair:

++'(.(x, y), z) -> ++'(y, z)


Rules:


rev(nil) -> nil
rev(rev(x)) -> x
rev(++(x, y)) -> ++(rev(y), rev(x))
++(nil, y) -> y
++(x, nil) -> x
++(.(x, y), z) -> .(x, ++(y, z))
++(x, ++(y, z)) -> ++(++(x, y), z)
make(x) -> .(x, nil)


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

++'(.(x, y), z) -> ++'(y, z)


There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the AFS that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order with Non-Strict Precedence with Quasi Precedence:
trivial

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
++'(x1, x2) -> ++'(x1, x2)
.(x1, x2) -> .(x1, x2)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 3
             ↳AFS
             ...
               →DP Problem 4
                 ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


rev(nil) -> nil
rev(rev(x)) -> x
rev(++(x, y)) -> ++(rev(y), rev(x))
++(nil, y) -> y
++(x, nil) -> x
++(.(x, y), z) -> .(x, ++(y, z))
++(x, ++(y, z)) -> ++(++(x, y), z)
make(x) -> .(x, nil)


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering


Dependency Pair:

REV(++(x, y)) -> REV(x)


Rules:


rev(nil) -> nil
rev(rev(x)) -> x
rev(++(x, y)) -> ++(rev(y), rev(x))
++(nil, y) -> y
++(x, nil) -> x
++(.(x, y), z) -> .(x, ++(y, z))
++(x, ++(y, z)) -> ++(++(x, y), z)
make(x) -> .(x, nil)


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

REV(++(x, y)) -> REV(x)


There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the AFS that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order with Non-Strict Precedence with Quasi Precedence:
trivial

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
REV(x1) -> REV(x1)
++(x1, x2) -> ++(x1, x2)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 5
             ↳Dependency Graph


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


rev(nil) -> nil
rev(rev(x)) -> x
rev(++(x, y)) -> ++(rev(y), rev(x))
++(nil, y) -> y
++(x, nil) -> x
++(.(x, y), z) -> .(x, ++(y, z))
++(x, ++(y, z)) -> ++(++(x, y), z)
make(x) -> .(x, nil)


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes