Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y, z]
rev(nil) -> nil
rev(++(x, y)) -> ++(rev1(x, y), rev2(x, y))
rev1(x, nil) -> x
rev1(x, ++(y, z)) -> rev1(y, z)
rev2(x, nil) -> nil
rev2(x, ++(y, z)) -> rev(++(x, rev(rev2(y, z))))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

REV(++(x, y)) -> REV1(x, y)
REV(++(x, y)) -> REV2(x, y)
REV1(x, ++(y, z)) -> REV1(y, z)
REV2(x, ++(y, z)) -> REV(++(x, rev(rev2(y, z))))
REV2(x, ++(y, z)) -> REV(rev2(y, z))
REV2(x, ++(y, z)) -> REV2(y, z)

Furthermore, R contains two SCCs. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polynomial Ordering
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo


Dependency Pair:

REV1(x, ++(y, z)) -> REV1(y, z)


Rules:


rev(nil) -> nil
rev(++(x, y)) -> ++(rev1(x, y), rev2(x, y))
rev1(x, nil) -> x
rev1(x, ++(y, z)) -> rev1(y, z)
rev2(x, nil) -> nil
rev2(x, ++(y, z)) -> rev(++(x, rev(rev2(y, z))))


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

REV1(x, ++(y, z)) -> REV1(y, z)


There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(REV1(x1, x2))=  x2  
  POL(++(x1, x2))=  1 + x2  

resulting in one new DP problem. 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
           →DP Problem 3
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


rev(nil) -> nil
rev(++(x, y)) -> ++(rev1(x, y), rev2(x, y))
rev1(x, nil) -> x
rev1(x, ++(y, z)) -> rev1(y, z)
rev2(x, nil) -> nil
rev2(x, ++(y, z)) -> rev(++(x, rev(rev2(y, z))))


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polynomial Ordering


Dependency Pairs:

REV2(x, ++(y, z)) -> REV2(y, z)
REV2(x, ++(y, z)) -> REV(rev2(y, z))
REV2(x, ++(y, z)) -> REV(++(x, rev(rev2(y, z))))
REV(++(x, y)) -> REV2(x, y)


Rules:


rev(nil) -> nil
rev(++(x, y)) -> ++(rev1(x, y), rev2(x, y))
rev1(x, nil) -> x
rev1(x, ++(y, z)) -> rev1(y, z)
rev2(x, nil) -> nil
rev2(x, ++(y, z)) -> rev(++(x, rev(rev2(y, z))))


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

REV2(x, ++(y, z)) -> REV2(y, z)
REV2(x, ++(y, z)) -> REV(rev2(y, z))
REV(++(x, y)) -> REV2(x, y)


Additionally, the following usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS can be oriented:

rev2(x, nil) -> nil
rev2(x, ++(y, z)) -> rev(++(x, rev(rev2(y, z))))
rev(nil) -> nil
rev(++(x, y)) -> ++(rev1(x, y), rev2(x, y))


Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(rev2(x1, x2))=  x2  
  POL(rev(x1))=  x1  
  POL(REV(x1))=  x1  
  POL(rev1(x1, x2))=  0  
  POL(++(x1, x2))=  1 + x2  
  POL(REV2(x1, x2))=  x2  
  POL(nil)=  0  

resulting in one new DP problem. 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Polo
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Polo
           →DP Problem 4
             ↳Dependency Graph


Dependency Pair:

REV2(x, ++(y, z)) -> REV(++(x, rev(rev2(y, z))))


Rules:


rev(nil) -> nil
rev(++(x, y)) -> ++(rev1(x, y), rev2(x, y))
rev1(x, nil) -> x
rev1(x, ++(y, z)) -> rev1(y, z)
rev2(x, nil) -> nil
rev2(x, ++(y, z)) -> rev(++(x, rev(rev2(y, z))))


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes