Term Rewriting System R:
[x]
fac(s(x)) -> *(fac(p(s(x))), s(x))
p(s(0)) -> 0
p(s(s(x))) -> s(p(s(x)))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

FAC(s(x)) -> FAC(p(s(x)))
FAC(s(x)) -> P(s(x))
P(s(s(x))) -> P(s(x))

Furthermore, R contains two SCCs. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:

P(s(s(x))) -> P(s(x))


Rules:


fac(s(x)) -> *(fac(p(s(x))), s(x))
p(s(0)) -> 0
p(s(s(x))) -> s(p(s(x)))


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

P(s(s(x))) -> P(s(x))


There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the AFS that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order with Non-Strict Precedence with Quasi Precedence:
trivial

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
P(x1) -> P(x1)
s(x1) -> s(x1)


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
           →DP Problem 3
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


fac(s(x)) -> *(fac(p(s(x))), s(x))
p(s(0)) -> 0
p(s(s(x))) -> s(p(s(x)))


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳AFS
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)




The following remains to be proven:
Dependency Pair:

FAC(s(x)) -> FAC(p(s(x)))


Rules:


fac(s(x)) -> *(fac(p(s(x))), s(x))
p(s(0)) -> 0
p(s(s(x))) -> s(p(s(x)))


Strategy:

innermost



Innermost Termination of R could not be shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes