Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y]
p(s(x)) -> x
s(p(x)) -> x
+(0, y) -> y
+(s(x), y) -> s(+(x, y))
+(p(x), y) -> p(+(x, y))
minus(0) -> 0
minus(s(x)) -> p(minus(x))
minus(p(x)) -> s(minus(x))
*(0, y) -> 0
*(s(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), y)
*(p(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), minus(y))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

+'(s(x), y) -> S(+(x, y))
+'(s(x), y) -> +'(x, y)
+'(p(x), y) -> P(+(x, y))
+'(p(x), y) -> +'(x, y)
MINUS(s(x)) -> P(minus(x))
MINUS(s(x)) -> MINUS(x)
MINUS(p(x)) -> S(minus(x))
MINUS(p(x)) -> MINUS(x)
*'(s(x), y) -> +'(*(x, y), y)
*'(s(x), y) -> *'(x, y)
*'(p(x), y) -> +'(*(x, y), minus(y))
*'(p(x), y) -> *'(x, y)
*'(p(x), y) -> MINUS(y)

Furthermore, R contains six SCCs. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Usable Rules (Innermost)
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pair:

+'(p(x), y) -> +'(x, y)


Rules:


p(s(x)) -> x
s(p(x)) -> x
+(0, y) -> y
+(s(x), y) -> s(+(x, y))
+(p(x), y) -> p(+(x, y))
minus(0) -> 0
minus(s(x)) -> p(minus(x))
minus(p(x)) -> s(minus(x))
*(0, y) -> 0
*(s(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), y)
*(p(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), minus(y))


Strategy:

innermost




As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 11 non-usable-rules.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
           →DP Problem 7
             ↳Size-Change Principle
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pair:

+'(p(x), y) -> +'(x, y)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We number the DPs as follows:
  1. +'(p(x), y) -> +'(x, y)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1
2=2

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1
2=2

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
p(x1) -> p(x1)

We obtain no new DP problems. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Usable Rules (Innermost)
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pair:

MINUS(p(x)) -> MINUS(x)


Rules:


p(s(x)) -> x
s(p(x)) -> x
+(0, y) -> y
+(s(x), y) -> s(+(x, y))
+(p(x), y) -> p(+(x, y))
minus(0) -> 0
minus(s(x)) -> p(minus(x))
minus(p(x)) -> s(minus(x))
*(0, y) -> 0
*(s(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), y)
*(p(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), minus(y))


Strategy:

innermost




As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 11 non-usable-rules.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳UsableRules
           →DP Problem 8
             ↳Size-Change Principle
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pair:

MINUS(p(x)) -> MINUS(x)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We number the DPs as follows:
  1. MINUS(p(x)) -> MINUS(x)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
p(x1) -> p(x1)

We obtain no new DP problems. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Usable Rules (Innermost)
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pair:

+'(s(x), y) -> +'(x, y)


Rules:


p(s(x)) -> x
s(p(x)) -> x
+(0, y) -> y
+(s(x), y) -> s(+(x, y))
+(p(x), y) -> p(+(x, y))
minus(0) -> 0
minus(s(x)) -> p(minus(x))
minus(p(x)) -> s(minus(x))
*(0, y) -> 0
*(s(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), y)
*(p(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), minus(y))


Strategy:

innermost




As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 11 non-usable-rules.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳UsableRules
           →DP Problem 9
             ↳Size-Change Principle
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pair:

+'(s(x), y) -> +'(x, y)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We number the DPs as follows:
  1. +'(s(x), y) -> +'(x, y)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1
2=2

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1
2=2

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
s(x1) -> s(x1)

We obtain no new DP problems. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳Usable Rules (Innermost)
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pair:

MINUS(s(x)) -> MINUS(x)


Rules:


p(s(x)) -> x
s(p(x)) -> x
+(0, y) -> y
+(s(x), y) -> s(+(x, y))
+(p(x), y) -> p(+(x, y))
minus(0) -> 0
minus(s(x)) -> p(minus(x))
minus(p(x)) -> s(minus(x))
*(0, y) -> 0
*(s(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), y)
*(p(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), minus(y))


Strategy:

innermost




As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 11 non-usable-rules.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳UsableRules
           →DP Problem 10
             ↳Size-Change Principle
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pair:

MINUS(s(x)) -> MINUS(x)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We number the DPs as follows:
  1. MINUS(s(x)) -> MINUS(x)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
s(x1) -> s(x1)

We obtain no new DP problems. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳Usable Rules (Innermost)
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pair:

*'(p(x), y) -> *'(x, y)


Rules:


p(s(x)) -> x
s(p(x)) -> x
+(0, y) -> y
+(s(x), y) -> s(+(x, y))
+(p(x), y) -> p(+(x, y))
minus(0) -> 0
minus(s(x)) -> p(minus(x))
minus(p(x)) -> s(minus(x))
*(0, y) -> 0
*(s(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), y)
*(p(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), minus(y))


Strategy:

innermost




As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 11 non-usable-rules.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳UsableRules
           →DP Problem 11
             ↳Size-Change Principle
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pair:

*'(p(x), y) -> *'(x, y)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We number the DPs as follows:
  1. *'(p(x), y) -> *'(x, y)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1
2=2

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1
2=2

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
p(x1) -> p(x1)

We obtain no new DP problems. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳Usable Rules (Innermost)


Dependency Pair:

*'(s(x), y) -> *'(x, y)


Rules:


p(s(x)) -> x
s(p(x)) -> x
+(0, y) -> y
+(s(x), y) -> s(+(x, y))
+(p(x), y) -> p(+(x, y))
minus(0) -> 0
minus(s(x)) -> p(minus(x))
minus(p(x)) -> s(minus(x))
*(0, y) -> 0
*(s(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), y)
*(p(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), minus(y))


Strategy:

innermost




As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 11 non-usable-rules.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 4
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 5
         ↳UsableRules
       →DP Problem 6
         ↳UsableRules
           →DP Problem 12
             ↳Size-Change Principle


Dependency Pair:

*'(s(x), y) -> *'(x, y)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We number the DPs as follows:
  1. *'(s(x), y) -> *'(x, y)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1
2=2

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1
2=2

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
s(x1) -> s(x1)

We obtain no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes