Term Rewriting System R:
[y, x]
-(0, y) -> 0
-(x, 0) -> x
-(x, s(y)) -> if(greater(x, s(y)), s(-(x, p(s(y)))), 0)
p(0) -> 0
p(s(x)) -> x
Innermost Termination of R to be shown.
R
↳Dependency Pair Analysis
R contains the following Dependency Pairs:
-'(x, s(y)) -> -'(x, p(s(y)))
-'(x, s(y)) -> P(s(y))
Furthermore, R contains one SCC.
R
↳DPs
→DP Problem 1
↳Usable Rules (Innermost)
Dependency Pair:
-'(x, s(y)) -> -'(x, p(s(y)))
Rules:
-(0, y) -> 0
-(x, 0) -> x
-(x, s(y)) -> if(greater(x, s(y)), s(-(x, p(s(y)))), 0)
p(0) -> 0
p(s(x)) -> x
Strategy:
innermost
As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 4 non-usable-rules.
R
↳DPs
→DP Problem 1
↳UsableRules
→DP Problem 2
↳Rewriting Transformation
Dependency Pair:
-'(x, s(y)) -> -'(x, p(s(y)))
Rule:
p(s(x)) -> x
Strategy:
innermost
On this DP problem, a Rewriting SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule
-'(x, s(y)) -> -'(x, p(s(y)))
one new Dependency Pair
is created:
-'(x, s(y)) -> -'(x, y)
The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:
R
↳DPs
→DP Problem 1
↳UsableRules
→DP Problem 2
↳Rw
...
→DP Problem 3
↳Usable Rules (Innermost)
Dependency Pair:
-'(x, s(y)) -> -'(x, y)
Rule:
p(s(x)) -> x
Strategy:
innermost
As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 1 non-usable-rules.
R
↳DPs
→DP Problem 1
↳UsableRules
→DP Problem 2
↳Rw
...
→DP Problem 4
↳Size-Change Principle
Dependency Pair:
-'(x, s(y)) -> -'(x, y)
Rule:
none
Strategy:
innermost
We number the DPs as follows:
- -'(x, s(y)) -> -'(x, y)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none
We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial
with Argument Filtering System:
s(x1) -> s(x1)
We obtain no new DP problems.
Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes