Term Rewriting System R:
[y, x, z]
++(nil, y) -> y
++(x, nil) -> x
++(.(x, y), z) -> .(x, ++(y, z))
++(++(x, y), z) -> ++(x, ++(y, z))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

++'(.(x, y), z) -> ++'(y, z)
++'(++(x, y), z) -> ++'(x, ++(y, z))
++'(++(x, y), z) -> ++'(y, z)

Furthermore, R contains one SCC. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Usable Rules (Innermost)


Dependency Pairs:

++'(++(x, y), z) -> ++'(y, z)
++'(.(x, y), z) -> ++'(y, z)


Rules:


++(nil, y) -> y
++(x, nil) -> x
++(.(x, y), z) -> .(x, ++(y, z))
++(++(x, y), z) -> ++(x, ++(y, z))


Strategy:

innermost




As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 4 non-usable-rules.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳UsableRules
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳Size-Change Principle


Dependency Pairs:

++'(++(x, y), z) -> ++'(y, z)
++'(.(x, y), z) -> ++'(y, z)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We number the DPs as follows:
  1. ++'(++(x, y), z) -> ++'(y, z)
  2. ++'(.(x, y), z) -> ++'(y, z)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1, 2} , {1, 2}
1>1
2=2

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1, 2} , {1, 2}
1>1
2=2

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
++(x1, x2) -> ++(x1, x2)
.(x1, x2) -> .(x1, x2)

We obtain no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes