Termination Proof using AProVE

Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y]
sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(x)) -> +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
sqr(s(x)) -> s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))
double(0) -> 0
double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

SQR(s(x)) -> +'(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
SQR(s(x)) -> SQR(x)
SQR(s(x)) -> DOUBLE(x)
SQR(s(x)) -> +'(sqr(x), double(x))
DOUBLE(s(x)) -> DOUBLE(x)
+'(x, s(y)) -> +'(x, y)

Furthermore, R contains three SCCs.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

+'(x, s(y)) -> +'(x, y)

Rules:

sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(x)) -> +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
sqr(s(x)) -> s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))
double(0) -> 0
double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

+'(x, s(y)) -> +'(x, y)

one new Dependency Pair is created:

+'(x'', s(s(y''))) -> +'(x'', s(y''))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 4

             ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

+'(x'', s(s(y''))) -> +'(x'', s(y''))

Rules:

sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(x)) -> +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
sqr(s(x)) -> s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))
double(0) -> 0
double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

+'(x'', s(s(y''))) -> +'(x'', s(y''))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

+'(x'''', s(s(s(y'''')))) -> +'(x'''', s(s(y'''')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 4

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 5

                 ↳Polynomial Ordering

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

+'(x'''', s(s(s(y'''')))) -> +'(x'''', s(s(y'''')))

Rules:

sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(x)) -> +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
sqr(s(x)) -> s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))
double(0) -> 0
double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

+'(x'''', s(s(s(y'''')))) -> +'(x'''', s(s(y'''')))

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:

POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

POL(+'(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂

resulting in one new DP problem.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 4

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 6

                 ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(x)) -> +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
sqr(s(x)) -> s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))
double(0) -> 0
double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

DOUBLE(s(x)) -> DOUBLE(x)

Rules:

sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(x)) -> +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
sqr(s(x)) -> s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))
double(0) -> 0
double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

DOUBLE(s(x)) -> DOUBLE(x)

one new Dependency Pair is created:

DOUBLE(s(s(x''))) -> DOUBLE(s(x''))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

DOUBLE(s(s(x''))) -> DOUBLE(s(x''))

Rules:

sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(x)) -> +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
sqr(s(x)) -> s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))
double(0) -> 0
double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

DOUBLE(s(s(x''))) -> DOUBLE(s(x''))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

DOUBLE(s(s(s(x'''')))) -> DOUBLE(s(s(x'''')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 8

                 ↳Polynomial Ordering

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

DOUBLE(s(s(s(x'''')))) -> DOUBLE(s(s(x'''')))

Rules:

sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(x)) -> +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
sqr(s(x)) -> s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))
double(0) -> 0
double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

DOUBLE(s(s(s(x'''')))) -> DOUBLE(s(s(x'''')))

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:

POL(DOUBLE(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

resulting in one new DP problem.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 9

                 ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(x)) -> +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
sqr(s(x)) -> s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))
double(0) -> 0
double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pair:

SQR(s(x)) -> SQR(x)

Rules:

sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(x)) -> +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
sqr(s(x)) -> s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))
double(0) -> 0
double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

SQR(s(x)) -> SQR(x)

one new Dependency Pair is created:

SQR(s(s(x''))) -> SQR(s(x''))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pair:

SQR(s(s(x''))) -> SQR(s(x''))

Rules:

sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(x)) -> +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
sqr(s(x)) -> s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))
double(0) -> 0
double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

SQR(s(s(x''))) -> SQR(s(x''))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

SQR(s(s(s(x'''')))) -> SQR(s(s(x'''')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 11

                 ↳Polynomial Ordering

Dependency Pair:

SQR(s(s(s(x'''')))) -> SQR(s(s(x'''')))

Rules:

sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(x)) -> +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
sqr(s(x)) -> s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))
double(0) -> 0
double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

SQR(s(s(s(x'''')))) -> SQR(s(s(x'''')))

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:

POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

POL(SQR(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

resulting in one new DP problem.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 12

                 ↳Dependency Graph

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(x)) -> +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
sqr(s(x)) -> s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))
double(0) -> 0
double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes