Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y]
f(0) -> 1
f(s(x)) -> g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) -> y
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, +(y, s(x)))
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, s(+(y, x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.



   R
Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

F(s(x)) -> G(x, s(x))
G(s(x), y) -> G(x, +(y, s(x)))
G(s(x), y) -> +'(y, s(x))
G(s(x), y) -> G(x, s(+(y, x)))
G(s(x), y) -> +'(y, x)
+'(x, s(y)) -> +'(x, y)

Furthermore, R contains two SCCs.


   R
DPs
       →DP Problem 1
Argument Filtering and Ordering
       →DP Problem 2
Rw


Dependency Pair:

+'(x, s(y)) -> +'(x, y)


Rules:


f(0) -> 1
f(s(x)) -> g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) -> y
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, +(y, s(x)))
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, s(+(y, x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

+'(x, s(y)) -> +'(x, y)


There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
+'(x1, x2) -> +'(x1, x2)
s(x1) -> s(x1)


   R
DPs
       →DP Problem 1
AFS
           →DP Problem 3
Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 2
Rw


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


f(0) -> 1
f(s(x)) -> g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) -> y
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, +(y, s(x)))
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, s(+(y, x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
DPs
       →DP Problem 1
AFS
       →DP Problem 2
Rewriting Transformation


Dependency Pairs:

G(s(x), y) -> G(x, s(+(y, x)))
G(s(x), y) -> G(x, +(y, s(x)))


Rules:


f(0) -> 1
f(s(x)) -> g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) -> y
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, +(y, s(x)))
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, s(+(y, x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Rewriting SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

G(s(x), y) -> G(x, +(y, s(x)))
one new Dependency Pair is created:

G(s(x), y) -> G(x, s(+(y, x)))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:



   R
DPs
       →DP Problem 1
AFS
       →DP Problem 2
Rw
           →DP Problem 4
Narrowing Transformation


Dependency Pairs:

G(s(x), y) -> G(x, s(+(y, x)))
G(s(x), y) -> G(x, s(+(y, x)))


Rules:


f(0) -> 1
f(s(x)) -> g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) -> y
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, +(y, s(x)))
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, s(+(y, x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

G(s(x), y) -> G(x, s(+(y, x)))
two new Dependency Pairs are created:

G(s(0), y') -> G(0, s(y'))
G(s(s(y'')), y0) -> G(s(y''), s(s(+(y0, y''))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:



   R
DPs
       →DP Problem 1
AFS
       →DP Problem 2
Rw
           →DP Problem 4
Nar
             ...
               →DP Problem 5
Narrowing Transformation


Dependency Pairs:

G(s(s(y'')), y0) -> G(s(y''), s(s(+(y0, y''))))
G(s(x), y) -> G(x, s(+(y, x)))


Rules:


f(0) -> 1
f(s(x)) -> g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) -> y
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, +(y, s(x)))
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, s(+(y, x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

G(s(x), y) -> G(x, s(+(y, x)))
two new Dependency Pairs are created:

G(s(0), y') -> G(0, s(y'))
G(s(s(y'')), y0) -> G(s(y''), s(s(+(y0, y''))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:



   R
DPs
       →DP Problem 1
AFS
       →DP Problem 2
Rw
           →DP Problem 4
Nar
             ...
               →DP Problem 6
Instantiation Transformation


Dependency Pairs:

G(s(s(y'')), y0) -> G(s(y''), s(s(+(y0, y''))))
G(s(s(y'')), y0) -> G(s(y''), s(s(+(y0, y''))))


Rules:


f(0) -> 1
f(s(x)) -> g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) -> y
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, +(y, s(x)))
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, s(+(y, x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, an Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

G(s(s(y'')), y0) -> G(s(y''), s(s(+(y0, y''))))
one new Dependency Pair is created:

G(s(s(y'''')), s(s(x''))) -> G(s(y''''), s(s(+(s(s(x'')), y''''))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:



   R
DPs
       →DP Problem 1
AFS
       →DP Problem 2
Rw
           →DP Problem 4
Nar
             ...
               →DP Problem 7
Instantiation Transformation


Dependency Pairs:

G(s(s(y'''')), s(s(x''))) -> G(s(y''''), s(s(+(s(s(x'')), y''''))))
G(s(s(y'')), y0) -> G(s(y''), s(s(+(y0, y''))))


Rules:


f(0) -> 1
f(s(x)) -> g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) -> y
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, +(y, s(x)))
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, s(+(y, x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, an Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

G(s(s(y'')), y0) -> G(s(y''), s(s(+(y0, y''))))
two new Dependency Pairs are created:

G(s(s(y'''')), s(s(x''))) -> G(s(y''''), s(s(+(s(s(x'')), y''''))))
G(s(s(y''')), s(s(x''))) -> G(s(y'''), s(s(+(s(s(x'')), y'''))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:



   R
DPs
       →DP Problem 1
AFS
       →DP Problem 2
Rw
           →DP Problem 4
Nar
             ...
               →DP Problem 8
Remaining Obligation(s)




The following remains to be proven:
Dependency Pairs:

G(s(s(y''')), s(s(x''))) -> G(s(y'''), s(s(+(s(s(x'')), y'''))))
G(s(s(y'''')), s(s(x''))) -> G(s(y''''), s(s(+(s(s(x'')), y''''))))
G(s(s(y'''')), s(s(x''))) -> G(s(y''''), s(s(+(s(s(x'')), y''''))))


Rules:


f(0) -> 1
f(s(x)) -> g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) -> y
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, +(y, s(x)))
g(s(x), y) -> g(x, s(+(y, x)))
+(x, 0) -> x
+(x, s(y)) -> s(+(x, y))


Strategy:

innermost



Innermost Termination of R could not be shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes