Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y]
minus(minus(x)) -> x
minus(h(x)) -> h(minus(x))
minus(f(x, y)) -> f(minus(y), minus(x))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.



   R
Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

MINUS(h(x)) -> MINUS(x)
MINUS(f(x, y)) -> MINUS(y)
MINUS(f(x, y)) -> MINUS(x)

Furthermore, R contains one SCC.


   R
DPs
       →DP Problem 1
Usable Rules (Innermost)


Dependency Pairs:

MINUS(f(x, y)) -> MINUS(x)
MINUS(f(x, y)) -> MINUS(y)
MINUS(h(x)) -> MINUS(x)


Rules:


minus(minus(x)) -> x
minus(h(x)) -> h(minus(x))
minus(f(x, y)) -> f(minus(y), minus(x))


Strategy:

innermost




As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 3 non-usable-rules.


   R
DPs
       →DP Problem 1
UsableRules
           →DP Problem 2
Size-Change Principle


Dependency Pairs:

MINUS(f(x, y)) -> MINUS(x)
MINUS(f(x, y)) -> MINUS(y)
MINUS(h(x)) -> MINUS(x)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We number the DPs as follows:
  1. MINUS(f(x, y)) -> MINUS(x)
  2. MINUS(f(x, y)) -> MINUS(y)
  3. MINUS(h(x)) -> MINUS(x)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1, 2, 3} , {1, 2, 3}
1>1

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1, 2, 3} , {1, 2, 3}
1>1

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
h(x1) -> h(x1)
f(x1, x2) -> f(x1, x2)

We obtain no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes