Termination Proof using AProVE

Term Rewriting System R:
[Y, X, N, L, M]
le(0, Y) -> true
le(s(X), 0) -> false
le(s(X), s(Y)) -> le(X, Y)
app(nil, Y) -> Y
app(cons(N, L), Y) -> cons(N, app(L, Y))
low(N, nil) -> nil
low(N, cons(M, L)) -> iflow(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
iflow(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, low(N, L))
iflow(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> low(N, L)
high(N, nil) -> nil
high(N, cons(M, L)) -> ifhigh(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
ifhigh(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> high(N, L)
ifhigh(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, high(N, L))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(cons(N, L)) -> app(quicksort(low(N, L)), cons(N, quicksort(high(N, L))))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

LE(s(X), s(Y)) -> LE(X, Y)
APP(cons(N, L), Y) -> APP(L, Y)
LOW(N, cons(M, L)) -> IFLOW(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
LOW(N, cons(M, L)) -> LE(M, N)
IFLOW(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> LOW(N, L)
IFLOW(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> LOW(N, L)
HIGH(N, cons(M, L)) -> IFHIGH(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
HIGH(N, cons(M, L)) -> LE(M, N)
IFHIGH(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> HIGH(N, L)
IFHIGH(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> HIGH(N, L)
QUICKSORT(cons(N, L)) -> APP(quicksort(low(N, L)), cons(N, quicksort(high(N, L))))
QUICKSORT(cons(N, L)) -> QUICKSORT(low(N, L))
QUICKSORT(cons(N, L)) -> LOW(N, L)
QUICKSORT(cons(N, L)) -> QUICKSORT(high(N, L))
QUICKSORT(cons(N, L)) -> HIGH(N, L)

Furthermore, R contains five SCCs.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

Dependency Pair:

LE(s(X), s(Y)) -> LE(X, Y)

Rules:

le(0, Y) -> true
le(s(X), 0) -> false
le(s(X), s(Y)) -> le(X, Y)
app(nil, Y) -> Y
app(cons(N, L), Y) -> cons(N, app(L, Y))
low(N, nil) -> nil
low(N, cons(M, L)) -> iflow(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
iflow(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, low(N, L))
iflow(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> low(N, L)
high(N, nil) -> nil
high(N, cons(M, L)) -> ifhigh(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
ifhigh(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> high(N, L)
ifhigh(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, high(N, L))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(cons(N, L)) -> app(quicksort(low(N, L)), cons(N, quicksort(high(N, L))))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

LE(s(X), s(Y)) -> LE(X, Y)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order with Non-Strict Precedence with Quasi Precedence:

trivial

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

LE(x₁, x₂) -> LE(x₁, x₂)
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 6

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

le(0, Y) -> true
le(s(X), 0) -> false
le(s(X), s(Y)) -> le(X, Y)
app(nil, Y) -> Y
app(cons(N, L), Y) -> cons(N, app(L, Y))
low(N, nil) -> nil
low(N, cons(M, L)) -> iflow(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
iflow(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, low(N, L))
iflow(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> low(N, L)
high(N, nil) -> nil
high(N, cons(M, L)) -> ifhigh(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
ifhigh(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> high(N, L)
ifhigh(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, high(N, L))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(cons(N, L)) -> app(quicksort(low(N, L)), cons(N, quicksort(high(N, L))))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

Dependency Pair:

APP(cons(N, L), Y) -> APP(L, Y)

Rules:

le(0, Y) -> true
le(s(X), 0) -> false
le(s(X), s(Y)) -> le(X, Y)
app(nil, Y) -> Y
app(cons(N, L), Y) -> cons(N, app(L, Y))
low(N, nil) -> nil
low(N, cons(M, L)) -> iflow(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
iflow(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, low(N, L))
iflow(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> low(N, L)
high(N, nil) -> nil
high(N, cons(M, L)) -> ifhigh(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
ifhigh(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> high(N, L)
ifhigh(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, high(N, L))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(cons(N, L)) -> app(quicksort(low(N, L)), cons(N, quicksort(high(N, L))))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

APP(cons(N, L), Y) -> APP(L, Y)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order with Non-Strict Precedence with Quasi Precedence:

trivial

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

APP(x₁, x₂) -> APP(x₁, x₂)
cons(x₁, x₂) -> cons(x₁, x₂)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

le(0, Y) -> true
le(s(X), 0) -> false
le(s(X), s(Y)) -> le(X, Y)
app(nil, Y) -> Y
app(cons(N, L), Y) -> cons(N, app(L, Y))
low(N, nil) -> nil
low(N, cons(M, L)) -> iflow(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
iflow(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, low(N, L))
iflow(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> low(N, L)
high(N, nil) -> nil
high(N, cons(M, L)) -> ifhigh(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
ifhigh(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> high(N, L)
ifhigh(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, high(N, L))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(cons(N, L)) -> app(quicksort(low(N, L)), cons(N, quicksort(high(N, L))))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

Dependency Pairs:

IFLOW(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> LOW(N, L)
IFLOW(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> LOW(N, L)
LOW(N, cons(M, L)) -> IFLOW(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))

Rules:

le(0, Y) -> true
le(s(X), 0) -> false
le(s(X), s(Y)) -> le(X, Y)
app(nil, Y) -> Y
app(cons(N, L), Y) -> cons(N, app(L, Y))
low(N, nil) -> nil
low(N, cons(M, L)) -> iflow(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
iflow(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, low(N, L))
iflow(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> low(N, L)
high(N, nil) -> nil
high(N, cons(M, L)) -> ifhigh(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
ifhigh(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> high(N, L)
ifhigh(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, high(N, L))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(cons(N, L)) -> app(quicksort(low(N, L)), cons(N, quicksort(high(N, L))))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

IFLOW(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> LOW(N, L)
IFLOW(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> LOW(N, L)

The following usable rules for innermost can be oriented:

le(0, Y) -> true
le(s(X), 0) -> false
le(s(X), s(Y)) -> le(X, Y)

Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order with Non-Strict Precedence with Quasi Precedence:

{true, 0, false}

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

IFLOW(x₁, x₂, x₃) -> x₃
cons(x₁, x₂) -> cons(x₁, x₂)
LOW(x₁, x₂) -> x₂
le(x₁, x₂) -> le(x₁, x₂)
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 8

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

Dependency Pair:

LOW(N, cons(M, L)) -> IFLOW(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))

Rules:

le(0, Y) -> true
le(s(X), 0) -> false
le(s(X), s(Y)) -> le(X, Y)
app(nil, Y) -> Y
app(cons(N, L), Y) -> cons(N, app(L, Y))
low(N, nil) -> nil
low(N, cons(M, L)) -> iflow(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
iflow(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, low(N, L))
iflow(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> low(N, L)
high(N, nil) -> nil
high(N, cons(M, L)) -> ifhigh(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
ifhigh(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> high(N, L)
ifhigh(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, high(N, L))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(cons(N, L)) -> app(quicksort(low(N, L)), cons(N, quicksort(high(N, L))))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

Dependency Pairs:

IFHIGH(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> HIGH(N, L)
IFHIGH(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> HIGH(N, L)
HIGH(N, cons(M, L)) -> IFHIGH(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))

Rules:

le(0, Y) -> true
le(s(X), 0) -> false
le(s(X), s(Y)) -> le(X, Y)
app(nil, Y) -> Y
app(cons(N, L), Y) -> cons(N, app(L, Y))
low(N, nil) -> nil
low(N, cons(M, L)) -> iflow(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
iflow(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, low(N, L))
iflow(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> low(N, L)
high(N, nil) -> nil
high(N, cons(M, L)) -> ifhigh(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
ifhigh(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> high(N, L)
ifhigh(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, high(N, L))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(cons(N, L)) -> app(quicksort(low(N, L)), cons(N, quicksort(high(N, L))))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

IFHIGH(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> HIGH(N, L)
IFHIGH(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> HIGH(N, L)

The following usable rules for innermost can be oriented:

le(0, Y) -> true
le(s(X), 0) -> false
le(s(X), s(Y)) -> le(X, Y)

Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order with Non-Strict Precedence with Quasi Precedence:

{IFHIGH, HIGH}
0 > true
le > false

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

HIGH(x₁, x₂) -> HIGH(x₁, x₂)
IFHIGH(x₁, x₂, x₃) -> IFHIGH(x₂, x₃)
cons(x₁, x₂) -> cons(x₁, x₂)
le(x₁, x₂) -> le(x₁, x₂)
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 9

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

Dependency Pair:

HIGH(N, cons(M, L)) -> IFHIGH(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))

Rules:

le(0, Y) -> true
le(s(X), 0) -> false
le(s(X), s(Y)) -> le(X, Y)
app(nil, Y) -> Y
app(cons(N, L), Y) -> cons(N, app(L, Y))
low(N, nil) -> nil
low(N, cons(M, L)) -> iflow(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
iflow(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, low(N, L))
iflow(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> low(N, L)
high(N, nil) -> nil
high(N, cons(M, L)) -> ifhigh(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
ifhigh(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> high(N, L)
ifhigh(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, high(N, L))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(cons(N, L)) -> app(quicksort(low(N, L)), cons(N, quicksort(high(N, L))))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

Dependency Pairs:

QUICKSORT(cons(N, L)) -> QUICKSORT(high(N, L))
QUICKSORT(cons(N, L)) -> QUICKSORT(low(N, L))

Rules:

le(0, Y) -> true
le(s(X), 0) -> false
le(s(X), s(Y)) -> le(X, Y)
app(nil, Y) -> Y
app(cons(N, L), Y) -> cons(N, app(L, Y))
low(N, nil) -> nil
low(N, cons(M, L)) -> iflow(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
iflow(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, low(N, L))
iflow(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> low(N, L)
high(N, nil) -> nil
high(N, cons(M, L)) -> ifhigh(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
ifhigh(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> high(N, L)
ifhigh(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, high(N, L))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(cons(N, L)) -> app(quicksort(low(N, L)), cons(N, quicksort(high(N, L))))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

QUICKSORT(cons(N, L)) -> QUICKSORT(high(N, L))
QUICKSORT(cons(N, L)) -> QUICKSORT(low(N, L))

The following usable rules for innermost can be oriented:

high(N, nil) -> nil
high(N, cons(M, L)) -> ifhigh(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
ifhigh(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> high(N, L)
ifhigh(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, high(N, L))
low(N, nil) -> nil
low(N, cons(M, L)) -> iflow(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
iflow(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, low(N, L))
iflow(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> low(N, L)
le(0, Y) -> true
le(s(X), 0) -> false
le(s(X), s(Y)) -> le(X, Y)

Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order with Non-Strict Precedence with Quasi Precedence:

{true, false, le}

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

QUICKSORT(x₁) -> QUICKSORT(x₁)
cons(x₁, x₂) -> cons(x₁, x₂)
high(x₁, x₂) -> x₂
low(x₁, x₂) -> x₂
ifhigh(x₁, x₂, x₃) -> x₃
iflow(x₁, x₂, x₃) -> x₃
le(x₁, x₂) -> le(x₁, x₂)
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Dependency Graph

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

le(0, Y) -> true
le(s(X), 0) -> false
le(s(X), s(Y)) -> le(X, Y)
app(nil, Y) -> Y
app(cons(N, L), Y) -> cons(N, app(L, Y))
low(N, nil) -> nil
low(N, cons(M, L)) -> iflow(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
iflow(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, low(N, L))
iflow(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> low(N, L)
high(N, nil) -> nil
high(N, cons(M, L)) -> ifhigh(le(M, N), N, cons(M, L))
ifhigh(true, N, cons(M, L)) -> high(N, L)
ifhigh(false, N, cons(M, L)) -> cons(M, high(N, L))
quicksort(nil) -> nil
quicksort(cons(N, L)) -> app(quicksort(low(N, L)), cons(N, quicksort(high(N, L))))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:04 minutes