Term Rewriting System R:
[X, Y, N, M]
eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(X)) -> false
eq(s(X), 0) -> false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) -> eq(X, Y)
rm(N, nil) -> nil
ifrm(true, N, add(M, X)) -> rm(N, X)
purge(nil) -> nil

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

`   R`
`     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis`

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

EQ(s(X), s(Y)) -> EQ(X, Y)
RM(N, add(M, X)) -> EQ(N, M)
IFRM(true, N, add(M, X)) -> RM(N, X)
IFRM(false, N, add(M, X)) -> RM(N, X)

Furthermore, R contains three SCCs.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Remaining`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Remaining`

Dependency Pair:

EQ(s(X), s(Y)) -> EQ(X, Y)

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(X)) -> false
eq(s(X), 0) -> false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) -> eq(X, Y)
rm(N, nil) -> nil
ifrm(true, N, add(M, X)) -> rm(N, X)
purge(nil) -> nil

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

EQ(s(X), s(Y)) -> EQ(X, Y)

There are no usable rules for innermost that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
EQ(x1, x2) -> EQ(x1, x2)
s(x1) -> s(x1)

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳AFS`
`           →DP Problem 4`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Remaining`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Remaining`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(X)) -> false
eq(s(X), 0) -> false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) -> eq(X, Y)
rm(N, nil) -> nil
ifrm(true, N, add(M, X)) -> rm(N, X)
purge(nil) -> nil

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳AFS`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)`

The following remains to be proven:
• Dependency Pairs:

IFRM(false, N, add(M, X)) -> RM(N, X)
IFRM(true, N, add(M, X)) -> RM(N, X)

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(X)) -> false
eq(s(X), 0) -> false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) -> eq(X, Y)
rm(N, nil) -> nil
ifrm(true, N, add(M, X)) -> rm(N, X)
purge(nil) -> nil

Strategy:

innermost

• Dependency Pair:

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(X)) -> false
eq(s(X), 0) -> false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) -> eq(X, Y)
rm(N, nil) -> nil
ifrm(true, N, add(M, X)) -> rm(N, X)
purge(nil) -> nil

Strategy:

innermost

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳AFS`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)`

The following remains to be proven:
• Dependency Pairs:

IFRM(false, N, add(M, X)) -> RM(N, X)
IFRM(true, N, add(M, X)) -> RM(N, X)

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(X)) -> false
eq(s(X), 0) -> false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) -> eq(X, Y)
rm(N, nil) -> nil
ifrm(true, N, add(M, X)) -> rm(N, X)
purge(nil) -> nil

Strategy:

innermost

• Dependency Pair:

Rules:

eq(0, 0) -> true
eq(0, s(X)) -> false
eq(s(X), 0) -> false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) -> eq(X, Y)
rm(N, nil) -> nil
ifrm(true, N, add(M, X)) -> rm(N, X)