Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y]
-(x, 0) -> x
-(0, s(y)) -> 0
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
lt(x, 0) -> false
lt(0, s(y)) -> true
lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
div(x, 0) -> 0
div(0, y) -> 0
div(s(x), s(y)) -> if(lt(x, y), 0, s(div(-(x, y), s(y))))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

`   R`
`     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis`

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

-'(s(x), s(y)) -> -'(x, y)
LT(s(x), s(y)) -> LT(x, y)
DIV(s(x), s(y)) -> IF(lt(x, y), 0, s(div(-(x, y), s(y))))
DIV(s(x), s(y)) -> LT(x, y)
DIV(s(x), s(y)) -> DIV(-(x, y), s(y))
DIV(s(x), s(y)) -> -'(x, y)

Furthermore, R contains three SCCs.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

-'(s(x), s(y)) -> -'(x, y)

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(0, s(y)) -> 0
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
lt(x, 0) -> false
lt(0, s(y)) -> true
lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
div(x, 0) -> 0
div(0, y) -> 0
div(s(x), s(y)) -> if(lt(x, y), 0, s(div(-(x, y), s(y))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

-'(s(x), s(y)) -> -'(x, y)
one new Dependency Pair is created:

-'(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> -'(s(x''), s(y''))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`           →DP Problem 4`
`             ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

-'(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> -'(s(x''), s(y''))

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(0, s(y)) -> 0
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
lt(x, 0) -> false
lt(0, s(y)) -> true
lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
div(x, 0) -> 0
div(0, y) -> 0
div(s(x), s(y)) -> if(lt(x, y), 0, s(div(-(x, y), s(y))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

-'(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> -'(s(x''), s(y''))
one new Dependency Pair is created:

-'(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> -'(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`           →DP Problem 4`
`             ↳FwdInst`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 5`
`                 ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

-'(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> -'(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(0, s(y)) -> 0
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
lt(x, 0) -> false
lt(0, s(y)) -> true
lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
div(x, 0) -> 0
div(0, y) -> 0
div(s(x), s(y)) -> if(lt(x, y), 0, s(div(-(x, y), s(y))))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

-'(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> -'(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(-'(x1, x2)) =  1 + x1 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`           →DP Problem 4`
`             ↳FwdInst`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 6`
`                 ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(0, s(y)) -> 0
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
lt(x, 0) -> false
lt(0, s(y)) -> true
lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
div(x, 0) -> 0
div(0, y) -> 0
div(s(x), s(y)) -> if(lt(x, y), 0, s(div(-(x, y), s(y))))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

LT(s(x), s(y)) -> LT(x, y)

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(0, s(y)) -> 0
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
lt(x, 0) -> false
lt(0, s(y)) -> true
lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
div(x, 0) -> 0
div(0, y) -> 0
div(s(x), s(y)) -> if(lt(x, y), 0, s(div(-(x, y), s(y))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

LT(s(x), s(y)) -> LT(x, y)
one new Dependency Pair is created:

LT(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> LT(s(x''), s(y''))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`           →DP Problem 7`
`             ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

LT(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> LT(s(x''), s(y''))

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(0, s(y)) -> 0
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
lt(x, 0) -> false
lt(0, s(y)) -> true
lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
div(x, 0) -> 0
div(0, y) -> 0
div(s(x), s(y)) -> if(lt(x, y), 0, s(div(-(x, y), s(y))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

LT(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> LT(s(x''), s(y''))
one new Dependency Pair is created:

LT(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> LT(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`           →DP Problem 7`
`             ↳FwdInst`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 8`
`                 ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

LT(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> LT(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(0, s(y)) -> 0
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
lt(x, 0) -> false
lt(0, s(y)) -> true
lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
div(x, 0) -> 0
div(0, y) -> 0
div(s(x), s(y)) -> if(lt(x, y), 0, s(div(-(x, y), s(y))))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

LT(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> LT(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(LT(x1, x2)) =  1 + x1 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`           →DP Problem 7`
`             ↳FwdInst`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 9`
`                 ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(0, s(y)) -> 0
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
lt(x, 0) -> false
lt(0, s(y)) -> true
lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
div(x, 0) -> 0
div(0, y) -> 0
div(s(x), s(y)) -> if(lt(x, y), 0, s(div(-(x, y), s(y))))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Narrowing Transformation`

Dependency Pair:

DIV(s(x), s(y)) -> DIV(-(x, y), s(y))

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(0, s(y)) -> 0
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
lt(x, 0) -> false
lt(0, s(y)) -> true
lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
div(x, 0) -> 0
div(0, y) -> 0
div(s(x), s(y)) -> if(lt(x, y), 0, s(div(-(x, y), s(y))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

DIV(s(x), s(y)) -> DIV(-(x, y), s(y))
three new Dependency Pairs are created:

DIV(s(x''), s(0)) -> DIV(x'', s(0))
DIV(s(0), s(s(y''))) -> DIV(0, s(s(y'')))
DIV(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> DIV(-(x'', y''), s(s(y'')))

The transformation is resulting in two new DP problems:

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`
`           →DP Problem 10`
`             ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation`
`           →DP Problem 11`
`             ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

DIV(s(x''), s(0)) -> DIV(x'', s(0))

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(0, s(y)) -> 0
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
lt(x, 0) -> false
lt(0, s(y)) -> true
lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
div(x, 0) -> 0
div(0, y) -> 0
div(s(x), s(y)) -> if(lt(x, y), 0, s(div(-(x, y), s(y))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

DIV(s(x''), s(0)) -> DIV(x'', s(0))
one new Dependency Pair is created:

DIV(s(s(x'''')), s(0)) -> DIV(s(x''''), s(0))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`
`           →DP Problem 10`
`             ↳FwdInst`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 12`
`                 ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`           →DP Problem 11`
`             ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

DIV(s(s(x'''')), s(0)) -> DIV(s(x''''), s(0))

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(0, s(y)) -> 0
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
lt(x, 0) -> false
lt(0, s(y)) -> true
lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
div(x, 0) -> 0
div(0, y) -> 0
div(s(x), s(y)) -> if(lt(x, y), 0, s(div(-(x, y), s(y))))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

DIV(s(s(x'''')), s(0)) -> DIV(s(x''''), s(0))

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(0) =  0 POL(DIV(x1, x2)) =  1 + x1 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`
`           →DP Problem 10`
`             ↳FwdInst`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 15`
`                 ↳Dependency Graph`
`           →DP Problem 11`
`             ↳Nar`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(0, s(y)) -> 0
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
lt(x, 0) -> false
lt(0, s(y)) -> true
lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
div(x, 0) -> 0
div(0, y) -> 0
div(s(x), s(y)) -> if(lt(x, y), 0, s(div(-(x, y), s(y))))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`
`           →DP Problem 10`
`             ↳FwdInst`
`           →DP Problem 11`
`             ↳Narrowing Transformation`

Dependency Pair:

DIV(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> DIV(-(x'', y''), s(s(y'')))

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(0, s(y)) -> 0
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
lt(x, 0) -> false
lt(0, s(y)) -> true
lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
div(x, 0) -> 0
div(0, y) -> 0
div(s(x), s(y)) -> if(lt(x, y), 0, s(div(-(x, y), s(y))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

DIV(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> DIV(-(x'', y''), s(s(y'')))
three new Dependency Pairs are created:

DIV(s(s(x''')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(x''', s(s(0)))
DIV(s(s(0)), s(s(s(y')))) -> DIV(0, s(s(s(y'))))
DIV(s(s(s(x'))), s(s(s(y')))) -> DIV(-(x', y'), s(s(s(y'))))

The transformation is resulting in two new DP problems:

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`
`           →DP Problem 10`
`             ↳FwdInst`
`           →DP Problem 11`
`             ↳Nar`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 13`
`                 ↳Polynomial Ordering`

Dependency Pair:

DIV(s(s(x''')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(x''', s(s(0)))

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(0, s(y)) -> 0
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
lt(x, 0) -> false
lt(0, s(y)) -> true
lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
div(x, 0) -> 0
div(0, y) -> 0
div(s(x), s(y)) -> if(lt(x, y), 0, s(div(-(x, y), s(y))))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

DIV(s(s(x''')), s(s(0))) -> DIV(x''', s(s(0)))

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(0) =  0 POL(DIV(x1, x2)) =  1 + x1 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳FwdInst`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Nar`
`           →DP Problem 10`
`             ↳FwdInst`
`           →DP Problem 11`
`             ↳Nar`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 14`
`                 ↳Polynomial Ordering`

Dependency Pair:

DIV(s(s(s(x'))), s(s(s(y')))) -> DIV(-(x', y'), s(s(s(y'))))

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(0, s(y)) -> 0
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
lt(x, 0) -> false
lt(0, s(y)) -> true
lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
div(x, 0) -> 0
div(0, y) -> 0
div(s(x), s(y)) -> if(lt(x, y), 0, s(div(-(x, y), s(y))))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

DIV(s(s(s(x'))), s(s(s(y')))) -> DIV(-(x', y'), s(s(s(y'))))

Additionally, the following usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS can be oriented:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(0, s(y)) -> 0
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(0) =  0 POL(DIV(x1, x2)) =  1 + x1 + x2 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1 POL(-(x1, x2)) =  x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes