Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y, u, z]
-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
<=(0, y) -> true
<=(s(x), 0) -> false
<=(s(x), s(y)) -> <=(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
perfectp(0) -> false
perfectp(s(x)) -> f(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
f(0, y, 0, u) -> true
f(0, y, s(z), u) -> false
f(s(x), 0, z, u) -> f(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
f(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> if(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

`   R`
`     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis`

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

-'(s(x), s(y)) -> -'(x, y)
<='(s(x), s(y)) -> <='(x, y)
PERFECTP(s(x)) -> F(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
F(s(x), 0, z, u) -> F(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
F(s(x), 0, z, u) -> -'(z, s(x))
F(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> IF(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))
F(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> <='(x, y)
F(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> F(s(x), -(y, x), z, u)
F(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> -'(y, x)
F(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> F(x, u, z, u)

Furthermore, R contains three SCCs.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pair:

-'(s(x), s(y)) -> -'(x, y)

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
<=(0, y) -> true
<=(s(x), 0) -> false
<=(s(x), s(y)) -> <=(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
perfectp(0) -> false
perfectp(s(x)) -> f(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
f(0, y, 0, u) -> true
f(0, y, s(z), u) -> false
f(s(x), 0, z, u) -> f(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
f(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> if(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

-'(s(x), s(y)) -> -'(x, y)

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(-'(x1, x2)) =  x1 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 4`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
<=(0, y) -> true
<=(s(x), 0) -> false
<=(s(x), s(y)) -> <=(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
perfectp(0) -> false
perfectp(s(x)) -> f(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
f(0, y, 0, u) -> true
f(0, y, s(z), u) -> false
f(s(x), 0, z, u) -> f(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
f(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> if(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pair:

<='(s(x), s(y)) -> <='(x, y)

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
<=(0, y) -> true
<=(s(x), 0) -> false
<=(s(x), s(y)) -> <=(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
perfectp(0) -> false
perfectp(s(x)) -> f(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
f(0, y, 0, u) -> true
f(0, y, s(z), u) -> false
f(s(x), 0, z, u) -> f(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
f(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> if(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

<='(s(x), s(y)) -> <='(x, y)

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1 POL(<='(x1, x2)) =  x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 5`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
<=(0, y) -> true
<=(s(x), 0) -> false
<=(s(x), s(y)) -> <=(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
perfectp(0) -> false
perfectp(s(x)) -> f(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
f(0, y, 0, u) -> true
f(0, y, s(z), u) -> false
f(s(x), 0, z, u) -> f(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
f(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> if(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`

Dependency Pairs:

F(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> F(x, u, z, u)
F(s(x), 0, z, u) -> F(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
F(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> F(s(x), -(y, x), z, u)

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
<=(0, y) -> true
<=(s(x), 0) -> false
<=(s(x), s(y)) -> <=(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
perfectp(0) -> false
perfectp(s(x)) -> f(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
f(0, y, 0, u) -> true
f(0, y, s(z), u) -> false
f(s(x), 0, z, u) -> f(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
f(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> if(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

F(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> F(x, u, z, u)
F(s(x), 0, z, u) -> F(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(0) =  0 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1 POL(-(x1, x2)) =  0 POL(F(x1, x2, x3, x4)) =  x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 6`
`             ↳Polynomial Ordering`

Dependency Pair:

F(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> F(s(x), -(y, x), z, u)

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
<=(0, y) -> true
<=(s(x), 0) -> false
<=(s(x), s(y)) -> <=(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
perfectp(0) -> false
perfectp(s(x)) -> f(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
f(0, y, 0, u) -> true
f(0, y, s(z), u) -> false
f(s(x), 0, z, u) -> f(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
f(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> if(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

F(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> F(s(x), -(y, x), z, u)

Additionally, the following usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS can be oriented:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(0) =  1 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1 POL(-(x1, x2)) =  x1 POL(F(x1, x2, x3, x4)) =  x2

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 6`
`             ↳Polo`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 7`
`                 ↳Dependency Graph`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
<=(0, y) -> true
<=(s(x), 0) -> false
<=(s(x), s(y)) -> <=(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
perfectp(0) -> false
perfectp(s(x)) -> f(x, s(0), s(x), s(x))
f(0, y, 0, u) -> true
f(0, y, s(z), u) -> false
f(s(x), 0, z, u) -> f(x, u, -(z, s(x)), u)
f(s(x), s(y), z, u) -> if(<=(x, y), f(s(x), -(y, x), z, u), f(x, u, z, u))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes