Term Rewriting System R:
[y, x]
leq(0, y) -> true
leq(s(x), 0) -> false
leq(s(x), s(y)) -> leq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> if(leq(y, x), mod(-(s(x), s(y)), s(y)), s(x))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

`   R`
`     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis`

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

LEQ(s(x), s(y)) -> LEQ(x, y)
-'(s(x), s(y)) -> -'(x, y)
MOD(s(x), s(y)) -> IF(leq(y, x), mod(-(s(x), s(y)), s(y)), s(x))
MOD(s(x), s(y)) -> LEQ(y, x)
MOD(s(x), s(y)) -> MOD(-(s(x), s(y)), s(y))
MOD(s(x), s(y)) -> -'(s(x), s(y))

Furthermore, R contains three SCCs.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Rw`

Dependency Pair:

LEQ(s(x), s(y)) -> LEQ(x, y)

Rules:

leq(0, y) -> true
leq(s(x), 0) -> false
leq(s(x), s(y)) -> leq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> if(leq(y, x), mod(-(s(x), s(y)), s(y)), s(x))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

LEQ(s(x), s(y)) -> LEQ(x, y)

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(LEQ(x1, x2)) =  x1 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 4`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Rw`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

leq(0, y) -> true
leq(s(x), 0) -> false
leq(s(x), s(y)) -> leq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> if(leq(y, x), mod(-(s(x), s(y)), s(y)), s(x))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Rw`

Dependency Pair:

-'(s(x), s(y)) -> -'(x, y)

Rules:

leq(0, y) -> true
leq(s(x), 0) -> false
leq(s(x), s(y)) -> leq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> if(leq(y, x), mod(-(s(x), s(y)), s(y)), s(x))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

-'(s(x), s(y)) -> -'(x, y)

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(-'(x1, x2)) =  x1 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 5`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Rw`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

leq(0, y) -> true
leq(s(x), 0) -> false
leq(s(x), s(y)) -> leq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> if(leq(y, x), mod(-(s(x), s(y)), s(y)), s(x))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Rewriting Transformation`

Dependency Pair:

MOD(s(x), s(y)) -> MOD(-(s(x), s(y)), s(y))

Rules:

leq(0, y) -> true
leq(s(x), 0) -> false
leq(s(x), s(y)) -> leq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> if(leq(y, x), mod(-(s(x), s(y)), s(y)), s(x))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Rewriting SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

MOD(s(x), s(y)) -> MOD(-(s(x), s(y)), s(y))
one new Dependency Pair is created:

MOD(s(x), s(y)) -> MOD(-(x, y), s(y))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Rw`
`           →DP Problem 6`
`             ↳Polynomial Ordering`

Dependency Pair:

MOD(s(x), s(y)) -> MOD(-(x, y), s(y))

Rules:

leq(0, y) -> true
leq(s(x), 0) -> false
leq(s(x), s(y)) -> leq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> if(leq(y, x), mod(-(s(x), s(y)), s(y)), s(x))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

MOD(s(x), s(y)) -> MOD(-(x, y), s(y))

Additionally, the following usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS can be oriented:

-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(0) =  1 POL(MOD(x1, x2)) =  x1 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1 POL(-(x1, x2)) =  x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Rw`
`           →DP Problem 6`
`             ↳Polo`
`             ...`
`               →DP Problem 7`
`                 ↳Dependency Graph`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

leq(0, y) -> true
leq(s(x), 0) -> false
leq(s(x), s(y)) -> leq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) -> x
if(false, x, y) -> y
-(x, 0) -> x
-(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
mod(0, y) -> 0
mod(s(x), 0) -> 0
mod(s(x), s(y)) -> if(leq(y, x), mod(-(s(x), s(y)), s(y)), s(x))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes