Term Rewriting System R:
[x, l, l1, l2]
isempty(nil) -> true
isempty(cons(x, l)) -> false
hd(cons(x, l)) -> x
tl(cons(x, l)) -> l
append(l1, l2) -> ifappend(l1, l2, isempty(l1))
ifappend(l1, l2, true) -> l2
ifappend(l1, l2, false) -> cons(hd(l1), append(tl(l1), l2))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

APPEND(l1, l2) -> IFAPPEND(l1, l2, isempty(l1))
APPEND(l1, l2) -> ISEMPTY(l1)
IFAPPEND(l1, l2, false) -> HD(l1)
IFAPPEND(l1, l2, false) -> APPEND(tl(l1), l2)
IFAPPEND(l1, l2, false) -> TL(l1)

Furthermore, R contains one SCC. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Narrowing Transformation


Dependency Pairs:

IFAPPEND(l1, l2, false) -> APPEND(tl(l1), l2)
APPEND(l1, l2) -> IFAPPEND(l1, l2, isempty(l1))


Rules:


isempty(nil) -> true
isempty(cons(x, l)) -> false
hd(cons(x, l)) -> x
tl(cons(x, l)) -> l
append(l1, l2) -> ifappend(l1, l2, isempty(l1))
ifappend(l1, l2, true) -> l2
ifappend(l1, l2, false) -> cons(hd(l1), append(tl(l1), l2))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

APPEND(l1, l2) -> IFAPPEND(l1, l2, isempty(l1))
two new Dependency Pairs are created:

APPEND(nil, l2) -> IFAPPEND(nil, l2, true)
APPEND(cons(x', l'), l2) -> IFAPPEND(cons(x', l'), l2, false)

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Nar
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳Narrowing Transformation


Dependency Pairs:

APPEND(cons(x', l'), l2) -> IFAPPEND(cons(x', l'), l2, false)
IFAPPEND(l1, l2, false) -> APPEND(tl(l1), l2)


Rules:


isempty(nil) -> true
isempty(cons(x, l)) -> false
hd(cons(x, l)) -> x
tl(cons(x, l)) -> l
append(l1, l2) -> ifappend(l1, l2, isempty(l1))
ifappend(l1, l2, true) -> l2
ifappend(l1, l2, false) -> cons(hd(l1), append(tl(l1), l2))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IFAPPEND(l1, l2, false) -> APPEND(tl(l1), l2)
one new Dependency Pair is created:

IFAPPEND(cons(x', l'), l2, false) -> APPEND(l', l2)

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Nar
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳Nar
             ...
               →DP Problem 3
                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation


Dependency Pairs:

IFAPPEND(cons(x', l'), l2, false) -> APPEND(l', l2)
APPEND(cons(x', l'), l2) -> IFAPPEND(cons(x', l'), l2, false)


Rules:


isempty(nil) -> true
isempty(cons(x, l)) -> false
hd(cons(x, l)) -> x
tl(cons(x, l)) -> l
append(l1, l2) -> ifappend(l1, l2, isempty(l1))
ifappend(l1, l2, true) -> l2
ifappend(l1, l2, false) -> cons(hd(l1), append(tl(l1), l2))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

IFAPPEND(cons(x', l'), l2, false) -> APPEND(l', l2)
one new Dependency Pair is created:

IFAPPEND(cons(x', cons(x''', l''')), l2'', false) -> APPEND(cons(x''', l'''), l2'')

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Nar
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳Nar
             ...
               →DP Problem 4
                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation


Dependency Pairs:

IFAPPEND(cons(x', cons(x''', l''')), l2'', false) -> APPEND(cons(x''', l'''), l2'')
APPEND(cons(x', l'), l2) -> IFAPPEND(cons(x', l'), l2, false)


Rules:


isempty(nil) -> true
isempty(cons(x, l)) -> false
hd(cons(x, l)) -> x
tl(cons(x, l)) -> l
append(l1, l2) -> ifappend(l1, l2, isempty(l1))
ifappend(l1, l2, true) -> l2
ifappend(l1, l2, false) -> cons(hd(l1), append(tl(l1), l2))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

APPEND(cons(x', l'), l2) -> IFAPPEND(cons(x', l'), l2, false)
one new Dependency Pair is created:

APPEND(cons(x''', cons(x''''', l''''')), l2') -> IFAPPEND(cons(x''', cons(x''''', l''''')), l2', false)

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Nar
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳Nar
             ...
               →DP Problem 5
                 ↳Polynomial Ordering


Dependency Pairs:

APPEND(cons(x''', cons(x''''', l''''')), l2') -> IFAPPEND(cons(x''', cons(x''''', l''''')), l2', false)
IFAPPEND(cons(x', cons(x''', l''')), l2'', false) -> APPEND(cons(x''', l'''), l2'')


Rules:


isempty(nil) -> true
isempty(cons(x, l)) -> false
hd(cons(x, l)) -> x
tl(cons(x, l)) -> l
append(l1, l2) -> ifappend(l1, l2, isempty(l1))
ifappend(l1, l2, true) -> l2
ifappend(l1, l2, false) -> cons(hd(l1), append(tl(l1), l2))


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

APPEND(cons(x''', cons(x''''', l''''')), l2') -> IFAPPEND(cons(x''', cons(x''''', l''''')), l2', false)


There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
  POL(IFAPPEND(x1, x2, x3))=  x1  
  POL(cons(x1, x2))=  1 + x2  
  POL(false)=  0  
  POL(APPEND(x1, x2))=  1 + x1  

resulting in one new DP problem. 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Nar
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳Nar
             ...
               →DP Problem 6
                 ↳Dependency Graph


Dependency Pair:

IFAPPEND(cons(x', cons(x''', l''')), l2'', false) -> APPEND(cons(x''', l'''), l2'')


Rules:


isempty(nil) -> true
isempty(cons(x, l)) -> false
hd(cons(x, l)) -> x
tl(cons(x, l)) -> l
append(l1, l2) -> ifappend(l1, l2, isempty(l1))
ifappend(l1, l2, true) -> l2
ifappend(l1, l2, false) -> cons(hd(l1), append(tl(l1), l2))


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes