Term Rewriting System R:
[y, x]
ack(0, y) -> s(y)
ack(s(x), 0) -> ack(x, s(0))
ack(s(x), s(y)) -> ack(x, ack(s(x), y))
ack(s(x), y) -> f(x, x)
f(s(x), y) -> f(x, s(x))
f(x, s(y)) -> f(y, x)
f(x, y) -> ack(x, y)
Innermost Termination of R to be shown.
R
↳Dependency Pair Analysis
R contains the following Dependency Pairs:
ACK(s(x), 0) -> ACK(x, s(0))
ACK(s(x), s(y)) -> ACK(x, ack(s(x), y))
ACK(s(x), s(y)) -> ACK(s(x), y)
ACK(s(x), y) -> F(x, x)
F(s(x), y) -> F(x, s(x))
F(x, s(y)) -> F(y, x)
F(x, y) -> ACK(x, y)
Furthermore, R contains one SCC.
R
↳DPs
→DP Problem 1
↳Size-Change Principle
Dependency Pairs:
F(x, y) -> ACK(x, y)
F(x, s(y)) -> F(y, x)
F(s(x), y) -> F(x, s(x))
ACK(s(x), y) -> F(x, x)
ACK(s(x), s(y)) -> ACK(s(x), y)
ACK(s(x), s(y)) -> ACK(x, ack(s(x), y))
ACK(s(x), 0) -> ACK(x, s(0))
Rules:
ack(0, y) -> s(y)
ack(s(x), 0) -> ack(x, s(0))
ack(s(x), s(y)) -> ack(x, ack(s(x), y))
ack(s(x), y) -> f(x, x)
f(s(x), y) -> f(x, s(x))
f(x, s(y)) -> f(y, x)
f(x, y) -> ack(x, y)
Strategy:
innermost
We number the DPs as follows:
- F(x, y) -> ACK(x, y)
- F(x, s(y)) -> F(y, x)
- F(s(x), y) -> F(x, s(x))
- ACK(s(x), y) -> F(x, x)
- ACK(s(x), s(y)) -> ACK(s(x), y)
- ACK(s(x), s(y)) -> ACK(x, ack(s(x), y))
- ACK(s(x), 0) -> ACK(x, s(0))
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none
We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial
with Argument Filtering System:
s(x1) -> s(x1)
We obtain no new DP problems.
Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes