Term Rewriting System R:
[x]
active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVE(f(x)) -> F(f(x))
CHK(no(f(x))) -> F(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
CHK(no(f(x))) -> CHK(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x))
CHK(no(f(x))) -> MAT(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)
CHK(no(f(x))) -> F(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X))))))))))
CHK(no(f(x))) -> F(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))
CHK(no(f(x))) -> F(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X))))))))
CHK(no(f(x))) -> F(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))
CHK(no(f(x))) -> F(f(f(f(f(f(X))))))
CHK(no(f(x))) -> F(f(f(f(f(X)))))
CHK(no(f(x))) -> F(f(f(f(X))))
CHK(no(f(x))) -> F(f(f(X)))
CHK(no(f(x))) -> F(f(X))
CHK(no(f(x))) -> F(X)
CHK(no(c)) -> ACTIVE(c)
MAT(f(x), f(y)) -> F(mat(x, y))
MAT(f(x), f(y)) -> MAT(x, y)
F(active(x)) -> ACTIVE(f(x))
F(active(x)) -> F(x)
F(no(x)) -> F(x)
F(mark(x)) -> F(x)
TP(mark(x)) -> TP(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
TP(mark(x)) -> CHK(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x))
TP(mark(x)) -> MAT(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)
TP(mark(x)) -> F(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X))))))))))
TP(mark(x)) -> F(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))
TP(mark(x)) -> F(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X))))))))
TP(mark(x)) -> F(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))
TP(mark(x)) -> F(f(f(f(f(f(X))))))
TP(mark(x)) -> F(f(f(f(f(X)))))
TP(mark(x)) -> F(f(f(f(X))))
TP(mark(x)) -> F(f(f(X)))
TP(mark(x)) -> F(f(X))
TP(mark(x)) -> F(X)

Furthermore, R contains three SCCs. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Nar
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pairs:

F(mark(x)) -> F(x)
F(no(x)) -> F(x)
F(active(x)) -> F(x)


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

F(active(x)) -> F(x)
three new Dependency Pairs are created:

F(active(active(x''))) -> F(active(x''))
F(active(no(x''))) -> F(no(x''))
F(active(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳FwdInst
           →DP Problem 4
             ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Nar
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pairs:

F(active(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
F(active(no(x''))) -> F(no(x''))
F(active(active(x''))) -> F(active(x''))
F(no(x)) -> F(x)
F(mark(x)) -> F(x)


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

F(no(x)) -> F(x)
five new Dependency Pairs are created:

F(no(no(x''))) -> F(no(x''))
F(no(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
F(no(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(no(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(no(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳FwdInst
           →DP Problem 4
             ↳FwdInst
             ...
               →DP Problem 5
                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Nar
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pairs:

F(no(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(no(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(no(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(no(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
F(no(no(x''))) -> F(no(x''))
F(active(no(x''))) -> F(no(x''))
F(active(active(x''))) -> F(active(x''))
F(mark(x)) -> F(x)
F(active(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

F(mark(x)) -> F(x)
nine new Dependency Pairs are created:

F(mark(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
F(mark(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(mark(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(mark(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(mark(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(mark(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(mark(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳FwdInst
           →DP Problem 4
             ↳FwdInst
             ...
               →DP Problem 6
                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Nar
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pairs:

F(mark(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(mark(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(mark(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(mark(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(mark(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(mark(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(no(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
F(no(no(x''))) -> F(no(x''))
F(active(no(x''))) -> F(no(x''))
F(active(active(x''))) -> F(active(x''))
F(mark(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(mark(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
F(active(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
F(no(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

F(active(no(x''))) -> F(no(x''))
five new Dependency Pairs are created:

F(active(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(active(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(active(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(active(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(active(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳FwdInst
           →DP Problem 4
             ↳FwdInst
             ...
               →DP Problem 7
                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Nar
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pairs:

F(mark(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(mark(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(mark(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(active(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(active(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(active(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(active(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(mark(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(no(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
F(no(no(x''))) -> F(no(x''))
F(active(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(active(active(x''))) -> F(active(x''))
F(mark(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(mark(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
F(active(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
F(no(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(mark(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

F(active(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
nine new Dependency Pairs are created:

F(active(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(active(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(active(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(active(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳FwdInst
           →DP Problem 4
             ↳FwdInst
             ...
               →DP Problem 8
                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Nar
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pairs:

F(mark(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(active(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(active(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(active(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(mark(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(active(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(active(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(no(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(active(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(active(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(active(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(active(active(x''))) -> F(active(x''))
F(mark(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(mark(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
F(no(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
F(no(no(x''))) -> F(no(x''))
F(active(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(no(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(mark(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

F(no(no(x''))) -> F(no(x''))
five new Dependency Pairs are created:

F(no(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(no(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(no(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(no(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳FwdInst
           →DP Problem 4
             ↳FwdInst
             ...
               →DP Problem 9
                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Nar
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pairs:

F(active(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(active(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(active(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(active(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(active(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(active(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(active(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(mark(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(no(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
F(no(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(no(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(active(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(active(active(x''))) -> F(active(x''))
F(mark(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(mark(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
F(active(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(no(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(mark(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

F(no(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
nine new Dependency Pairs are created:

F(no(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(no(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(no(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(no(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳FwdInst
           →DP Problem 4
             ↳FwdInst
             ...
               →DP Problem 10
                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Nar
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pairs:

F(active(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(active(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(no(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(no(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(active(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(active(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(no(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(no(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(no(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(active(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(no(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(mark(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(no(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(no(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(no(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(active(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(active(active(x''))) -> F(active(x''))
F(mark(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(mark(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
F(active(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(no(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(mark(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

F(mark(mark(x''))) -> F(mark(x''))
nine new Dependency Pairs are created:

F(mark(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(mark(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳FwdInst
           →DP Problem 4
             ↳FwdInst
             ...
               →DP Problem 11
                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Nar
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pairs:

F(mark(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(active(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(no(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(no(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(active(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(active(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(mark(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(no(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(active(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(active(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(no(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(active(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(active(active(x''))) -> F(active(x''))
F(mark(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(mark(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(no(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(no(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(no(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(active(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(no(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(mark(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

F(mark(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
five new Dependency Pairs are created:

F(mark(no(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(no(no(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳FwdInst
           →DP Problem 4
             ↳FwdInst
             ...
               →DP Problem 12
                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Nar
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pairs:

F(mark(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(active(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(active(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(no(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(no(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(active(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(active(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(active(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(no(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(no(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(no(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(no(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(no(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(no(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(active(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(mark(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(mark(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(no(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(no(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(active(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(active(active(x''))) -> F(active(x''))
F(mark(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(mark(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(active(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(no(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(mark(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

F(mark(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
nine new Dependency Pairs are created:

F(mark(no(mark(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(mark(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(mark(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(mark(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(mark(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(mark(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(no(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(mark(no(no(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(no(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(mark(no(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(no(active(active(x''''''''''))))))) -> F(no(mark(no(active(active(x''''''''''))))))
F(mark(no(mark(no(active(no(x''''''''''))))))) -> F(no(mark(no(active(no(x''''''''''))))))
F(mark(no(mark(no(active(mark(x''''''''''))))))) -> F(no(mark(no(active(mark(x''''''''''))))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳FwdInst
           →DP Problem 4
             ↳FwdInst
             ...
               →DP Problem 13
                 ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Nar
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pairs:

F(mark(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(active(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(active(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(no(active(mark(x''''''''''))))))) -> F(no(mark(no(active(mark(x''''''''''))))))
F(no(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(no(active(no(x''''''''''))))))) -> F(no(mark(no(active(no(x''''''''''))))))
F(mark(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(no(active(active(x''''''''''))))))) -> F(no(mark(no(active(active(x''''''''''))))))
F(no(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(mark(no(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(mark(no(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(no(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(mark(no(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(mark(no(no(x'''''''')))))
F(no(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(mark(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(mark(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(mark(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(mark(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(mark(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(no(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(no(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(no(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(mark(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(no(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(active(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(active(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(no(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(active(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(active(active(x''))) -> F(active(x''))
F(mark(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(mark(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(no(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(no(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(no(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(active(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(no(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(mark(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

F(mark(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(active(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(active(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(no(active(mark(x''''''''''))))))) -> F(no(mark(no(active(mark(x''''''''''))))))
F(no(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(no(active(no(x''''''''''))))))) -> F(no(mark(no(active(no(x''''''''''))))))
F(mark(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(no(active(active(x''''''''''))))))) -> F(no(mark(no(active(active(x''''''''''))))))
F(no(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(mark(no(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(mark(no(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(no(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(mark(no(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(mark(no(no(x'''''''')))))
F(no(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(mark(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(mark(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(mark(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(mark(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(mark(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(mark(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(no(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(no(active(mark(x'''''''')))))
F(no(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))
F(no(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))) -> F(no(no(active(active(x'''''''')))))
F(mark(no(no(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(no(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(no(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(no(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(no(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(no(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(mark(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(active(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(no(active(mark(x'''')))) -> F(active(mark(x'''')))
F(active(no(active(mark(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(mark(x''''''))))
F(active(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(active(no(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(no(mark(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(no(x''''''))))
F(no(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(active(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(active(active(x''))) -> F(active(x''))
F(mark(active(active(x'''')))) -> F(active(active(x'''')))
F(mark(mark(active(active(x''''''))))) -> F(mark(active(active(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(no(mark(mark(x'''')))) -> F(mark(mark(x'''')))
F(no(no(mark(x'''')))) -> F(no(mark(x'''')))
F(no(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(active(no(no(x'''')))) -> F(no(no(x'''')))
F(no(active(no(x'''')))) -> F(active(no(x'''')))
F(mark(no(active(no(x''''''))))) -> F(no(active(no(x''''''))))
F(mark(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))) -> F(mark(no(active(no(x'''''''')))))


The following usable rules for innermost can be oriented:

active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))


Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order with Non-Strict Precedence with Quasi Precedence:
{active, mark}

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
F(x1) -> F(x1)
active(x1) -> active(x1)
no(x1) -> no(x1)
mark(x1) -> mark(x1)
f(x1) -> x1


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳FwdInst
           →DP Problem 4
             ↳FwdInst
             ...
               →DP Problem 14
                 ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Nar
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pair:


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳FwdInst
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Narrowing Transformation
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pair:

CHK(no(f(x))) -> CHK(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x))


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

CHK(no(f(x))) -> CHK(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x))
two new Dependency Pairs are created:

CHK(no(f(f(y)))) -> CHK(f(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X))))))))), y)))
CHK(no(f(c))) -> CHK(no(c))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳FwdInst
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Nar
           →DP Problem 15
             ↳Narrowing Transformation
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Nar


Dependency Pair:

CHK(no(f(f(y)))) -> CHK(f(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X))))))))), y)))


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

CHK(no(f(f(y)))) -> CHK(f(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X))))))))), y)))
no new Dependency Pairs are created.
The transformation is resulting in no new DP problems. 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳FwdInst
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Nar
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Narrowing Transformation


Dependency Pair:

TP(mark(x)) -> TP(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

TP(mark(x)) -> TP(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
two new Dependency Pairs are created:

TP(mark(f(y))) -> TP(chk(f(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X))))))))), y))))
TP(mark(c)) -> TP(chk(no(c)))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳FwdInst
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Nar
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Nar
           →DP Problem 16
             ↳Narrowing Transformation


Dependency Pairs:

TP(mark(c)) -> TP(chk(no(c)))
TP(mark(f(y))) -> TP(chk(f(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X))))))))), y))))


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

TP(mark(f(y))) -> TP(chk(f(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X))))))))), y))))
no new Dependency Pairs are created.
The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳FwdInst
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Nar
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Nar
           →DP Problem 16
             ↳Nar
             ...
               →DP Problem 17
                 ↳Narrowing Transformation


Dependency Pair:

TP(mark(c)) -> TP(chk(no(c)))


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

TP(mark(c)) -> TP(chk(no(c)))
one new Dependency Pair is created:

TP(mark(c)) -> TP(active(c))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳FwdInst
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Nar
       →DP Problem 3
         ↳Nar
           →DP Problem 16
             ↳Nar
             ...
               →DP Problem 18
                 ↳Narrowing Transformation


Dependency Pair:

TP(mark(c)) -> TP(active(c))


Rules:


active(f(x)) -> mark(f(f(x)))
chk(no(f(x))) -> f(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))
chk(no(c)) -> active(c)
mat(f(x), f(y)) -> f(mat(x, y))
mat(f(x), c) -> no(c)
f(active(x)) -> active(f(x))
f(no(x)) -> no(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
tp(mark(x)) -> tp(chk(mat(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X)))))))))), x)))


Strategy:

innermost




On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

TP(mark(c)) -> TP(active(c))
no new Dependency Pairs are created.
The transformation is resulting in no new DP problems.


Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:06 minutes