Termination Proof using AProVE

Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y]
active(f(x)) -> mark(x)
active(f(x)) -> f(active(x))
top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c))
top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x))
top(found(x)) -> top(active(x))
check(f(x)) -> f(check(x))
check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x))
match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y))
match(X, x) -> proper(x)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x))
f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x))
f(found(x)) -> found(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
start(ok(x)) -> found(x)

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVE(f(x)) -> F(active(x))
ACTIVE(f(x)) -> ACTIVE(x)
TOP(active(c)) -> TOP(mark(c))
TOP(mark(x)) -> TOP(check(x))
TOP(mark(x)) -> CHECK(x)
TOP(found(x)) -> TOP(active(x))
TOP(found(x)) -> ACTIVE(x)
CHECK(f(x)) -> F(check(x))
CHECK(f(x)) -> CHECK(x)
CHECK(x) -> START(match(f(X), x))
CHECK(x) -> MATCH(f(X), x)
CHECK(x) -> F(X)
MATCH(f(x), f(y)) -> F(match(x, y))
MATCH(f(x), f(y)) -> MATCH(x, y)
MATCH(X, x) -> PROPER(x)
PROPER(f(x)) -> F(proper(x))
PROPER(f(x)) -> PROPER(x)
F(ok(x)) -> F(x)
F(found(x)) -> F(x)
F(mark(x)) -> F(x)

Furthermore, R contains six SCCs.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pairs:

F(mark(x)) -> F(x)
F(found(x)) -> F(x)
F(ok(x)) -> F(x)

Rules:

active(f(x)) -> mark(x)
active(f(x)) -> f(active(x))
top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c))
top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x))
top(found(x)) -> top(active(x))
check(f(x)) -> f(check(x))
check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x))
match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y))
match(X, x) -> proper(x)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x))
f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x))
f(found(x)) -> found(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
start(ok(x)) -> found(x)

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

F(mark(x)) -> F(x)
F(found(x)) -> F(x)
F(ok(x)) -> F(x)

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the AFS that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Homeomorphic Embedding Order with EMB
resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

F(x₁) -> F(x₁)
ok(x₁) -> ok(x₁)
mark(x₁) -> mark(x₁)
found(x₁) -> found(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(f(x)) -> mark(x)
active(f(x)) -> f(active(x))
top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c))
top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x))
top(found(x)) -> top(active(x))
check(f(x)) -> f(check(x))
check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x))
match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y))
match(X, x) -> proper(x)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x))
f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x))
f(found(x)) -> found(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
start(ok(x)) -> found(x)

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

ACTIVE(f(x)) -> ACTIVE(x)

Rules:

active(f(x)) -> mark(x)
active(f(x)) -> f(active(x))
top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c))
top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x))
top(found(x)) -> top(active(x))
check(f(x)) -> f(check(x))
check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x))
match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y))
match(X, x) -> proper(x)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x))
f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x))
f(found(x)) -> found(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
start(ok(x)) -> found(x)

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

ACTIVE(f(x)) -> ACTIVE(x)

ACTIVE(x₁) -> ACTIVE(x₁)
f(x₁) -> f(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 8

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(f(x)) -> mark(x)
active(f(x)) -> f(active(x))
top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c))
top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x))
top(found(x)) -> top(active(x))
check(f(x)) -> f(check(x))
check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x))
match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y))
match(X, x) -> proper(x)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x))
f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x))
f(found(x)) -> found(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
start(ok(x)) -> found(x)

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

PROPER(f(x)) -> PROPER(x)

Rules:

active(f(x)) -> mark(x)
active(f(x)) -> f(active(x))
top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c))
top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x))
top(found(x)) -> top(active(x))
check(f(x)) -> f(check(x))
check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x))
match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y))
match(X, x) -> proper(x)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x))
f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x))
f(found(x)) -> found(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
start(ok(x)) -> found(x)

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

PROPER(f(x)) -> PROPER(x)

PROPER(x₁) -> PROPER(x₁)
f(x₁) -> f(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 9

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(f(x)) -> mark(x)
active(f(x)) -> f(active(x))
top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c))
top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x))
top(found(x)) -> top(active(x))
check(f(x)) -> f(check(x))
check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x))
match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y))
match(X, x) -> proper(x)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x))
f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x))
f(found(x)) -> found(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
start(ok(x)) -> found(x)

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

MATCH(f(x), f(y)) -> MATCH(x, y)

Rules:

active(f(x)) -> mark(x)
active(f(x)) -> f(active(x))
top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c))
top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x))
top(found(x)) -> top(active(x))
check(f(x)) -> f(check(x))
check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x))
match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y))
match(X, x) -> proper(x)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x))
f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x))
f(found(x)) -> found(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
start(ok(x)) -> found(x)

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

MATCH(f(x), f(y)) -> MATCH(x, y)

MATCH(x₁, x₂) -> MATCH(x₁, x₂)
f(x₁) -> f(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(f(x)) -> mark(x)
active(f(x)) -> f(active(x))
top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c))
top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x))
top(found(x)) -> top(active(x))
check(f(x)) -> f(check(x))
check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x))
match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y))
match(X, x) -> proper(x)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x))
f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x))
f(found(x)) -> found(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
start(ok(x)) -> found(x)

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

CHECK(f(x)) -> CHECK(x)

Rules:

active(f(x)) -> mark(x)
active(f(x)) -> f(active(x))
top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c))
top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x))
top(found(x)) -> top(active(x))
check(f(x)) -> f(check(x))
check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x))
match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y))
match(X, x) -> proper(x)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x))
f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x))
f(found(x)) -> found(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
start(ok(x)) -> found(x)

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

CHECK(f(x)) -> CHECK(x)

CHECK(x₁) -> CHECK(x₁)
f(x₁) -> f(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 11

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

active(f(x)) -> mark(x)
active(f(x)) -> f(active(x))
top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c))
top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x))
top(found(x)) -> top(active(x))
check(f(x)) -> f(check(x))
check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x))
match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y))
match(X, x) -> proper(x)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x))
f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x))
f(found(x)) -> found(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
start(ok(x)) -> found(x)

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Narrowing Transformation

Dependency Pairs:

TOP(found(x)) -> TOP(active(x))
TOP(mark(x)) -> TOP(check(x))
TOP(active(c)) -> TOP(mark(c))

Rules:

active(f(x)) -> mark(x)
active(f(x)) -> f(active(x))
top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c))
top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x))
top(found(x)) -> top(active(x))
check(f(x)) -> f(check(x))
check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x))
match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y))
match(X, x) -> proper(x)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x))
f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x))
f(found(x)) -> found(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
start(ok(x)) -> found(x)

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

TOP(mark(x)) -> TOP(check(x))

two new Dependency Pairs are created:

TOP(mark(f(x''))) -> TOP(f(check(x'')))
TOP(mark(x'')) -> TOP(start(match(f(X), x'')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 12

             ↳Remaining Obligation(s)

The following remains to be proven:
Dependency Pairs:

TOP(mark(f(x''))) -> TOP(f(check(x'')))
TOP(mark(x'')) -> TOP(start(match(f(X), x'')))
TOP(active(c)) -> TOP(mark(c))
TOP(found(x)) -> TOP(active(x))

Rules:

active(f(x)) -> mark(x)
active(f(x)) -> f(active(x))
top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c))
top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x))
top(found(x)) -> top(active(x))
check(f(x)) -> f(check(x))
check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x))
match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y))
match(X, x) -> proper(x)
proper(c) -> ok(c)
proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x))
f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x))
f(found(x)) -> found(f(x))
f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x))
start(ok(x)) -> found(x)

Strategy:

innermost

Innermost Termination of R could not be shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes