Term Rewriting System R:
[y, x]
le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
pred(s(x)) -> x
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
gcd(0, y) -> y
gcd(s(x), 0) -> s(x)
gcd(s(x), s(y)) -> ifgcd(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifgcd(true, s(x), s(y)) -> gcd(minus(x, y), s(y))
ifgcd(false, s(x), s(y)) -> gcd(minus(y, x), s(x))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

`   R`
`     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis`

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

LE(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(x, y)
MINUS(x, s(y)) -> PRED(minus(x, y))
MINUS(x, s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)
GCD(s(x), s(y)) -> IFGCD(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
GCD(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(y, x)
IFGCD(true, s(x), s(y)) -> GCD(minus(x, y), s(y))
IFGCD(true, s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)
IFGCD(false, s(x), s(y)) -> GCD(minus(y, x), s(x))
IFGCD(false, s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(y, x)

Furthermore, R contains three SCCs.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pair:

LE(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(x, y)

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
pred(s(x)) -> x
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
gcd(0, y) -> y
gcd(s(x), 0) -> s(x)
gcd(s(x), s(y)) -> ifgcd(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifgcd(true, s(x), s(y)) -> gcd(minus(x, y), s(y))
ifgcd(false, s(x), s(y)) -> gcd(minus(y, x), s(x))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

LE(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(x, y)

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(LE(x1, x2)) =  x1 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 4`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
pred(s(x)) -> x
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
gcd(0, y) -> y
gcd(s(x), 0) -> s(x)
gcd(s(x), s(y)) -> ifgcd(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifgcd(true, s(x), s(y)) -> gcd(minus(x, y), s(y))
ifgcd(false, s(x), s(y)) -> gcd(minus(y, x), s(x))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pair:

MINUS(x, s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
pred(s(x)) -> x
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
gcd(0, y) -> y
gcd(s(x), 0) -> s(x)
gcd(s(x), s(y)) -> ifgcd(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifgcd(true, s(x), s(y)) -> gcd(minus(x, y), s(y))
ifgcd(false, s(x), s(y)) -> gcd(minus(y, x), s(x))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

MINUS(x, s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(MINUS(x1, x2)) =  x2 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 5`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
pred(s(x)) -> x
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
gcd(0, y) -> y
gcd(s(x), 0) -> s(x)
gcd(s(x), s(y)) -> ifgcd(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifgcd(true, s(x), s(y)) -> gcd(minus(x, y), s(y))
ifgcd(false, s(x), s(y)) -> gcd(minus(y, x), s(x))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`

Dependency Pairs:

IFGCD(false, s(x), s(y)) -> GCD(minus(y, x), s(x))
IFGCD(true, s(x), s(y)) -> GCD(minus(x, y), s(y))
GCD(s(x), s(y)) -> IFGCD(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
pred(s(x)) -> x
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
gcd(0, y) -> y
gcd(s(x), 0) -> s(x)
gcd(s(x), s(y)) -> ifgcd(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifgcd(true, s(x), s(y)) -> gcd(minus(x, y), s(y))
ifgcd(false, s(x), s(y)) -> gcd(minus(y, x), s(x))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

IFGCD(false, s(x), s(y)) -> GCD(minus(y, x), s(x))
IFGCD(true, s(x), s(y)) -> GCD(minus(x, y), s(y))

Additionally, the following usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS can be oriented:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
pred(s(x)) -> x

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(0) =  0 POL(GCD(x1, x2)) =  x1 + x2 POL(false) =  0 POL(pred(x1)) =  x1 POL(minus(x1, x2)) =  x1 POL(true) =  0 POL(IF_GCD(x1, x2, x3)) =  x2 + x3 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1 POL(le(x1, x2)) =  0

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 6`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`

Dependency Pair:

GCD(s(x), s(y)) -> IFGCD(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
pred(s(x)) -> x
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
gcd(0, y) -> y
gcd(s(x), 0) -> s(x)
gcd(s(x), s(y)) -> ifgcd(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifgcd(true, s(x), s(y)) -> gcd(minus(x, y), s(y))
ifgcd(false, s(x), s(y)) -> gcd(minus(y, x), s(x))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes